Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
GateRouter
Smartly choose from 30+ AI models, with 0% extra fees
When the market was cheaper a few weeks ago, I wanted my beta (volatility factor) higher than the market.
I sold more puts and added more exposure.
Now the market is less compelling, so I have to do the opposite.
I trimmed a little this past week & may continue to do more.
The totality of the data dictates how I allocate, not BS short term headlines or emotions.
The framework I want everyone to internalize is the hierarchy of bullishness.
Shares are mid-bullish.
Selling puts is super bullish.
Buying calls is max bullish 10 out of 10
This is also the order of difficulty of making money.
Calls are the hardest
Sold puts are easier
Shares are the easiest.
So why would you have max difficulty in your portfolio when the setup isn't max compelling? You wouldn't.
Everybody can make money in a bull market.
The question is who's still standing when it turns.