Lately, I've been discussing the boundaries of on-chain privacy and compliance. To be honest, ordinary users shouldn't expect to be completely invisible while freely entering and exiting fiat channels; it's quite difficult to balance both sides. On-chain data is inherently traceable. You can do some basic protections (don't post your address everywhere, don't use the same address everywhere), but if you're trying to fight for forensic evidence at that level, the costs and risks are not something we should be playing with.

By the way, the NFT royalty mudslinging match also looks quite similar: creators want sustainable income, but the secondary market thinks too many restrictions hurt liquidity. Privacy is also a similar tug-of-war — the more "free" it is, the easier it is to be abused; the more "compliant" it is, the more it resembles traditional finance. My expectation is to keep it modest: a wallet is a ledger, not a safe. Minimize exposure where possible. For large transactions, slow down, split them up, use limit orders — don’t get too excited and just use market orders, handing over your heartbeat.