Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
GateRouter
Smartly choose from 30+ AI models, with 0% extra fees
I noticed an interesting legal development. The U.S. federal court recently dismissed a multi-year fraud lawsuit against Uniswap Labs, a case that has been ongoing since 2022.
Here's the story. The plaintiffs claimed that Uniswap facilitated the trading of scam tokens on its decentralized protocol and filed 14 charges against Uniswap, its founders, Adams, and other defendants. They argued that, as a marketplace, Uniswap collected fees from the issuance and trading of scam tokens, effectively acting as an unregistered broker.
However, the court did not agree. Judge Failla of the Southern District of New York dismissed the plaintiffs' claims after four years of litigation, in a biased manner. The core reason was straightforward: the plaintiffs failed to prove that the defendants knew about the scams or that Uniswap and Adams provided significant assistance in the fraud.
This was not a one-time dismissal. The plaintiffs actually amended their complaint three times. In August 2023, the court dismissed the amended complaint for failing to state a valid claim under federal securities law. Dissatisfied, the plaintiffs appealed to the Second Circuit, which in February 2025 partially upheld the dismissal but allowed the plaintiffs to amend again. As a result, the second amended complaint submitted in May 2025 mainly focused on violations of state law but still failed to establish a valid claim.
The judge explicitly stated that even if the plaintiffs could prove the defendants knew about the scams, their claims would still fail because they could not demonstrate that the defendants provided significant assistance in the issuer’s fraudulent conduct. Ultimately, this Uniswap scam case did not hold up.
Adams commented on the outcome, calling it "a good and reasonable result." From a legal perspective, this ruling is indeed a victory for Uniswap Labs and reflects the court’s understanding of the boundaries of responsibility for decentralized protocols — that the protocol itself should not be held liable for all activities conducted by its users.