Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
GateRouter
Smartly choose from 30+ AI models, with 0% extra fees
I just read about a very controversial proposal that former Mt. Gox CEO, Mark Karpelès, is raising within the Bitcoin community. Basically, he is suggesting a network hard fork to recover those 80,000 bitcoins that were stolen in the 2011 attack. We're talking about something in the range of $5.2 billion at current prices, which is absolutely huge.
The interesting detail is that these funds have remained locked in that address since the attack, completely immobile for over 15 years. According to normal Bitcoin rules, there's no way to access this money without the corresponding private key. But Karpelès' proposal aims to change that, allowing Mt. Gox to recover these outputs through a specific signature from the address.
The idea is to incorporate these recovered bitcoins into the ongoing compensation process supervised by the courts, to reimburse Mt. Gox creditors who were harmed at the time. He makes it clear that this is just a starting point for discussion, with nothing finalized yet. The plan would be to limit rule changes only to this specific address and activate it at a predetermined block height.
But here comes the big caveat: any such change requires coordination across the entire network. If a significant portion of the community does not support it, we risk splitting the blockchain. It’s basically a fork against the will of some nodes, which is always delicate.
Another important point: these 80,000 bitcoins are not currently under the control of the bankruptcy administrator, nor are they part of the assets to be distributed to creditors. So technically, Mt. Gox’s proposal would have to convince the entire network to accept this rule change. It will be interesting to see how the community reacts to this.