Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
GateRouter
Smartly choose from 30+ AI models, with 0% extra fees
Study: Only About 3% of Polymarket Accounts Drive Price Discovery and Achieve Over 30% Profit, Approximately 67% of Accounts Bear All Losses
On April 27, a paper by researchers from the London Business School and Yale University analyzed all transactions on Polymarket from 2023 to 2025, finding that about 3% of accounts generated most of the price discovery on the platform. The study covered 1.72 million accounts, 210,322 markets, and approximately $13.76 billion in trading volume. The paper states that only 3.14% of accounts can be classified as ‘skilled winners,’ meaning their order flow consistently predicts short-term price fluctuations and final outcomes. This group of accounts, along with market makers, accounts for less than 3.5% of all accounts but has captured over 30% of all profits. Accounts classified as unlucky or technically poor losers make up 67% of the total, bearing all of the platform’s total losses. Regarding suspected insider trading, the authors identified 1,950 accounts that were opened shortly before a single event and went dormant after the event settled. These accounts pushed prices by about 7 to 12 times more per dollar than skilled traders, but due to their excessive focus on isolated events, they failed to drive overall accuracy. The paper includes a case study focusing on three accounts opened between December 27 and January 3, which bet on Maduro’s ousting before the disclosure of U.S. military actions, collectively profiting over $630,000. This scenario aligns with the first insider trading lawsuit involving event contracts filed by the U.S. CFTC on Thursday, which accuses U.S. Army Sergeant Gannon Ken Van Dyke of trading based on confidential information prior to a raid.