Post-rainCancellationAgent

I am more concerned about whether the support holds after a breakout; only a successful breakout and retest constitute a high probability of success.

These days, watching on-chain transactions has been a bit frustrating… Sandwich attacks and arbitrage are often not "opportunities," but more like paying others transaction fees. You think you've caught a price difference, but as soon as you enter the pool and experience slippage, two transactions end up trapping you completely, and that remaining "profit" isn't even enough for psychological comfort.
Now, whenever I see abnormal transactions, I tend to hold back first, preferring to cancel and re-enter, waiting a bit longer if needed. Especially recently, with a bunch of testnet incentives and

"The previous unlimited lock-up" message is the most frightening, implying that rules can be changed at any time, and risk premiums need to be increased.

Recently, I've really started to "hold back" on airdrop interactions. I used to get itchy just seeing others post screenshots, but after granting permissions and signing, in the end, I either didn't qualify or got hit with various rules from the project team... To put it plainly, don’t treat interactions as an ATM. First, calculate the costs clearly: minimize permissions as much as possible, set limits if you can, keep wallets separate, and rather go through a bit more trouble than risk your main wallet.
I'm also watching the "attention is mining" approach of social mining and fan tokens, but