#Gate广场五月交易分享
LAB Price Trend Analysis and Investment Advice
1. Market Summary
LAB current quote: 4.59 USDT, up 3% in 24 hours, up 130% in 7 days, up 1002% in 30 days, up 3684% in 90 days—an astonishing growth figure. But behind this number is a project that on-chain detective ZachXBT has publicly accused of market manipulation, with a 500% surge in 2 days followed by an 84% crash in 8 hours. If you're considering investing in LAB, what you need to understand first is not "how much it can rise," but "whether you should touch this coin."
2. Manipulation Allegations—LAB's Biggest Risk Is Not Volatility but Fraud
On May 7, on-chain detective ZachXBT posted a $10k bounty, seeking the passport/ID information of LAB founder Vova Sadkov, as well as the market maker contracts and chat records used on exchange contracts for LAB. This is not ordinary market analysis commentary—it's a direct accusation that the founder coordinated market manipulation across exchanges.
ZachXBT and EmberCN's on-chain evidence chain is very specific:
The team-related wallet transferred 96 million LAB (worth about $63 million) to B*tget a week before the pump, and then pumped the price
A suspected insider wallet accumulated about 575k LAB at an average price of $0.20 (total cost about $12,800), deposited the tokens into an exchange and sold them 30 minutes before the all-time high, making a profit of about $1.13 million
Most of the supply of LAB is controlled by the team/related parties (over 90%), allowing them to manipulate prices through AMM during market making without distributing tokens
The team also unilaterally changed the token unlock schedule for investors, with the modified unlock happening within two months
This manipulation script is "exactly the same" as the previously exposed RAVE, SIREN, RIVER projects—ZachXBT himself has pointed out this pattern. The Chinese community's reaction is also quite telling: in the face of solid evidence, the number of people cursing ZachXBT is ten times more than those thanking him—indicating that many retail investors are deeply holding and unwilling to face the truth.
3. Project Fundamentals—Well-Packaged but Weak in Substance
LAB is positioned as "Multi-chain Trading Infrastructure," integrating spot, limit, and perpetual contract trading, with an AI research engine, aiming to provide high-performance execution and executable strategies across trading platforms. It sounds very professional, but the core issues are:
Total supply of 1 billion tokens, with 12% allocated for exchange liquidity in the initial distribution, and large portions held by the team and project treasury/reserves
Most of the supply is controlled by related parties (over 90%), and the tokenomics design essentially favors manipulation
The team unilaterally changed the investor unlock schedule, indicating very low governance transparency
The project's TGE is scheduled for Q4 2025, less than half a year away, and multiple extreme price events have already occurred
Ranked 78th in value, with a market cap of about $10k, but this market cap is a inflated valuation formed after manipulation-driven rally
4. Current Technical and Market Sentiment
Technical indicators show no clear directional signals—no overbought or oversold conditions, no golden or death crosses, no divergences. This itself is a warning: when technical indicators are "quiet," the price movement may be entirely driven by manipulator operations rather than market natural battles.
Market sentiment shows 57% positive and 43% negative, with only a 14% gap— for a token with a 1002% 30-day increase, positive sentiment should be much higher. The high proportion of negative sentiment directly reflects the impact of manipulation allegations. Discussion activity has decreased by 55% over the past 3 days (from 62 to 28 posts), indicating market attention is waning. The number of KOL posts is zero, with no influential opinion leaders endorsing LAB.
Open contract positions decreased from 629 million to 599 million USDT (a decline of about 4.8%), suggesting some leverage funds are withdrawing. The 24-hour trading volume is about 39.26 million USDT, which is relatively liquid given the market cap, but in the context of the majority supply being controlled by manipulators, liquidity could sharply change with large trades at any time.
5. Investment Advice—Avoid Large Positions
The reason is not "it might fall," but "this project's price movement has been proven to be manipulated; investing in LAB is essentially not trading based on market consensus but gambling against the manipulators." Specific risks include:
Manipulation risk: ZachXBT's bounty and EmberCN's on-chain evidence constitute substantial manipulation accusations. If regulators intervene or exchanges take action (such as suspending trading), holders may face situations where they cannot sell.
Token structure risk: Over 90% of the supply is controlled by related parties, making retail buy/sell impact negligible. Manipulators can decide to pump or dump at any time, leaving retail investors passive.
Legal risk: If manipulation is confirmed, LAB tokens could be classified as fraudulent securities, facing delisting, freezing, or legal prosecution. Holders could suffer total losses.
Unlock risk: The team unilaterally changed the investor unlock schedule, with the modified unlock happening within two months. Large unlocks could bring huge selling pressure.
It is advised not to hold large positions. If you really want to play, consider small positions and buy the dip during sharp declines, engaging in swing trading.
LAB Price Trend Analysis and Investment Advice
1. Market Summary
LAB current quote: 4.59 USDT, up 3% in 24 hours, up 130% in 7 days, up 1002% in 30 days, up 3684% in 90 days—an astonishing growth figure. But behind this number is a project that on-chain detective ZachXBT has publicly accused of market manipulation, with a 500% surge in 2 days followed by an 84% crash in 8 hours. If you're considering investing in LAB, what you need to understand first is not "how much it can rise," but "whether you should touch this coin."
2. Manipulation Allegations—LAB's Biggest Risk Is Not Volatility but Fraud
On May 7, on-chain detective ZachXBT posted a $10k bounty, seeking the passport/ID information of LAB founder Vova Sadkov, as well as the market maker contracts and chat records used on exchange contracts for LAB. This is not ordinary market analysis commentary—it's a direct accusation that the founder coordinated market manipulation across exchanges.
ZachXBT and EmberCN's on-chain evidence chain is very specific:
The team-related wallet transferred 96 million LAB (worth about $63 million) to B*tget a week before the pump, and then pumped the price
A suspected insider wallet accumulated about 575k LAB at an average price of $0.20 (total cost about $12,800), deposited the tokens into an exchange and sold them 30 minutes before the all-time high, making a profit of about $1.13 million
Most of the supply of LAB is controlled by the team/related parties (over 90%), allowing them to manipulate prices through AMM during market making without distributing tokens
The team also unilaterally changed the token unlock schedule for investors, with the modified unlock happening within two months
This manipulation script is "exactly the same" as the previously exposed RAVE, SIREN, RIVER projects—ZachXBT himself has pointed out this pattern. The Chinese community's reaction is also quite telling: in the face of solid evidence, the number of people cursing ZachXBT is ten times more than those thanking him—indicating that many retail investors are deeply holding and unwilling to face the truth.
3. Project Fundamentals—Well-Packaged but Weak in Substance
LAB is positioned as "Multi-chain Trading Infrastructure," integrating spot, limit, and perpetual contract trading, with an AI research engine, aiming to provide high-performance execution and executable strategies across trading platforms. It sounds very professional, but the core issues are:
Total supply of 1 billion tokens, with 12% allocated for exchange liquidity in the initial distribution, and large portions held by the team and project treasury/reserves
Most of the supply is controlled by related parties (over 90%), and the tokenomics design essentially favors manipulation
The team unilaterally changed the investor unlock schedule, indicating very low governance transparency
The project's TGE is scheduled for Q4 2025, less than half a year away, and multiple extreme price events have already occurred
Ranked 78th in value, with a market cap of about $10k, but this market cap is a inflated valuation formed after manipulation-driven rally
4. Current Technical and Market Sentiment
Technical indicators show no clear directional signals—no overbought or oversold conditions, no golden or death crosses, no divergences. This itself is a warning: when technical indicators are "quiet," the price movement may be entirely driven by manipulator operations rather than market natural battles.
Market sentiment shows 57% positive and 43% negative, with only a 14% gap— for a token with a 1002% 30-day increase, positive sentiment should be much higher. The high proportion of negative sentiment directly reflects the impact of manipulation allegations. Discussion activity has decreased by 55% over the past 3 days (from 62 to 28 posts), indicating market attention is waning. The number of KOL posts is zero, with no influential opinion leaders endorsing LAB.
Open contract positions decreased from 629 million to 599 million USDT (a decline of about 4.8%), suggesting some leverage funds are withdrawing. The 24-hour trading volume is about 39.26 million USDT, which is relatively liquid given the market cap, but in the context of the majority supply being controlled by manipulators, liquidity could sharply change with large trades at any time.
5. Investment Advice—Avoid Large Positions
The reason is not "it might fall," but "this project's price movement has been proven to be manipulated; investing in LAB is essentially not trading based on market consensus but gambling against the manipulators." Specific risks include:
Manipulation risk: ZachXBT's bounty and EmberCN's on-chain evidence constitute substantial manipulation accusations. If regulators intervene or exchanges take action (such as suspending trading), holders may face situations where they cannot sell.
Token structure risk: Over 90% of the supply is controlled by related parties, making retail buy/sell impact negligible. Manipulators can decide to pump or dump at any time, leaving retail investors passive.
Legal risk: If manipulation is confirmed, LAB tokens could be classified as fraudulent securities, facing delisting, freezing, or legal prosecution. Holders could suffer total losses.
Unlock risk: The team unilaterally changed the investor unlock schedule, with the modified unlock happening within two months. Large unlocks could bring huge selling pressure.
It is advised not to hold large positions. If you really want to play, consider small positions and buy the dip during sharp declines, engaging in swing trading.
