WY

Weyerhaeuser Co Price

Closed
WY
$23.66
+$0.14(+0.59%)

*Data last updated: 2026-05-23 01:10 (UTC+8)

As of 2026-05-23 01:10, Weyerhaeuser Co (WY) is priced at $23.66, with a total market cap of $17.05B, a P/E ratio of 52.73, and a dividend yield of 3.55%. Today, the stock price fluctuated between $23.47 and $23.85. The current price is 0.80% above the day's low and 0.79% below the day's high, with a trading volume of 2.72M. Over the past 52 weeks, WY has traded between $22.45 to $25.79, and the current price is -8.25% away from the 52-week high.

WY Key Stats

Yesterday's Close$23.52
Market Cap$17.05B
Volume2.72M
P/E Ratio52.73
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.55%
Dividend Amount$0.21
Diluted EPS (TTM)0.55
Net Income (FY)$324.00M
Revenue (FY)$6.90B
Earnings Date2026-07-23
EPS Estimate0.10
Revenue Estimate$1.86B
Shares Outstanding725.33M
Beta (1Y)0.913
Ex-Dividend Date2026-06-05
Dividend Payment Date2026-06-22

About WY

Weyerhaeuser Company, one of the world's largest private owners of timberlands, began operations in 1900. We own or control approximately 11 million acres of timberlands in the U.S. and manage additional timberlands under long-term licenses in Canada. We manage these timberlands on a sustainable basis in compliance with internationally recognized forestry standards. We are also one of the largest manufacturers of wood products in North America. Our company is a real estate investment trust. In 2020, we generated $7.5 billion in net sales and employed approximately 9,400 people who serve customers worldwide. We are listed on the Dow Jones Sustainability North America Index. Our common stock trades on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol WY.
SectorBasic Materials
IndustryPaper, Lumber & Forest Products
CEODevin W. Stockfish
HeadquartersSeattle,WA,US
Employees (FY)9.51K
Average Revenue (1Y)$725.54K
Net Income per Employee$34.04K

Weyerhaeuser Co (WY) FAQ

What's the stock price of Weyerhaeuser Co (WY) today?

x
Weyerhaeuser Co (WY) is currently trading at $23.66, with a 24h change of +0.59%. The 52-week trading range is $22.45–$25.79.

What are the 52-week high and low prices for Weyerhaeuser Co (WY)?

x

What is the price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of Weyerhaeuser Co (WY)? What does it indicate?

x

What is the market cap of Weyerhaeuser Co (WY)?

x

What is the most recent quarterly earnings per share (EPS) for Weyerhaeuser Co (WY)?

x

Should you buy or sell Weyerhaeuser Co (WY) now?

x

What factors can affect the stock price of Weyerhaeuser Co (WY)?

x

How to buy Weyerhaeuser Co (WY) stock?

x

Risk Warning

The stock market involves a high level of risk and price volatility. The value of your investment may increase or decrease, and you may not recover the full amount invested. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. Before making any investment decisions, you should carefully assess your investment experience, financial situation, investment objectives, and risk tolerance, and conduct your own research. Where appropriate, consult an independent financial adviser.

Disclaimer

The content on this page is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, financial advice, or trading recommendations. Gate shall not be held liable for any loss or damage resulting from such financial decisions. Further, take note that Gate may not be able to provide full service in certain markets and jurisdictions, including but not limited to the United States of America, Canada, Iran, and Cuba. For more information on Restricted Locations, please refer to the User Agreement.

Other Trading Markets

Hot Posts About Weyerhaeuser Co (WY)

SheenCrypto

SheenCrypto

05-02 00:33
#USSeeksStrategicBitcoinReserve US Moves Toward Strategic Bitcoin Reserve: A New Era for Digital Assets? By [sheen crypto] Date: May 2, 2026 WASHINGTON, D.C. – In a landmark policy shift, discussions within the U.S. government have accelerated regarding the establishment of a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve (SBR) , a move that could parallel the nation’s Strategic Petroleum Reserve. The initiative, tagged under the viral hashtag signals growing bipartisan acknowledgment of Bitcoin as a tier-one monetary asset. From National Debt to Digital Fortress The proposal, first floated by pro-crypto lawmakers and now reportedly under preliminary review by the Treasury Department, would authorize the U.S. to hold seized Bitcoin—and potentially make direct open-market purchases—as a permanent store of value. Sources indicate that current holdings, derived from high-profile seizures like the Silk Road funds (approx. 205,000 BTC), could form the seed of the reserve. Proponents argue that just as the U.S. stockpiled oil to hedge against supply shocks, a Bitcoin reserve would hedge against dollar debasement, rising inflation, and de-dollarization trends by rival nations. Why Bitcoin? The “Digital Gold” Argument Senator Cynthia Lummis (R-WY), a long-time Bitcoin advocate, recently doubled down on her legislative push for an SBR. “Bitcoin is verifiable, finite, and apolitical,” Lummis stated. “A Strategic Bitcoin Reserve would strengthen the dollar by diversifying our assets into the hardest form of money ever created. It tells the world: America leads the digital future.” The strategic rationale includes: · Debt hedge: Offsetting future dollar devaluation against a fixed-supply asset. · Geopolitical leverage: Countering China’s digital yuan and BRICS nations’ gold accumulation. · Cyber deterrence: Securing a decentralized network that cannot be sanctioned or frozen. Challenges and Skepticism Not everyone is convinced. Critics, including former Treasury Secretary Lawrence Summers, have called the idea “political theater.” Key concerns include: · Volatility: Bitcoin’s 70%+ drawdowns could destabilize government balance sheets. · Regulatory conflict: The current administration has yet to clarify whether Bitcoin is a commodity, currency, or security. · Legislative hurdles: The Federal Reserve remains reluctant to hold unbacked crypto assets. The White House declined to comment on ongoing internal debates, though a National Economic Council spokesperson said, “All responsible tools to secure U.S. financial leadership are on the table.” Market and Global Reaction The mere speculation of an SBR has already moved markets. Bitcoin surged 12% following the latest Senate hearing on the topic, while analysts at Standard Chartered upped their 2026 year-end BTC target to $250,000, citing “government demand as a game-changer.” Globally, reactions are split. El Salvador—which holds over 5,700 BTC—welcomed the news, while European Central Bank officials warned of “destabilizing monetary sovereignty.” What Comes Next? For the to become law, three steps are required: 1. Executive Order or Act of Congress – An EO could start with seized assets; full purchases require legislation. 2. SEC & CFTC classification clarity – Resolving the regulatory status of held assets. 3. International coordination – Likely discussions with G7 partners to avoid market distortion. As the 2026 election cycle heats up, the SBR has become a wedge issue. Pro-crypto candidates are rallying behind it, while skeptics warn of government gambling on a volatile asset. For now, the hashtag continues to trend—not just as social media noise, but as a signal that the world’s largest economy is seriously considering a place for Bitcoin in its strategic arsenal.
4
7
0
0
Luna_Star

Luna_Star

04-07 06:50
#BitcoinMiningIndustryUpdates #Gate广场四月发帖挑战 The Great Restructuring: How Bitcoin Mining Became a Survival Business in 2026 The Bitcoin mining industry that existed at the start of 2025 — flush with post-halving anticipation, riding an all-time high in network hashrate, and buoyed by a Bitcoin price that had touched $124,500 in early October — is not the industry that exists today. What replaced it is leaner, more desperate, more politically entangled, and in several cases no longer a mining business at all. The story of Bitcoin mining in early 2026 is not a story of growth. It is a story of who can afford to stay in the room, and who quietly slipped out through the side door marked "AI Infrastructure." --- **The Hashprice Collapse That CoinShares Called the Worst Since the Halving** CoinShares, in its Q4 2025 mining report released in late March 2026, delivered a verdict that needed no softening: Q4 2025 was the most challenging quarter for Bitcoin miners since the April 2024 halving. The numbers explain why. Bitcoin had peaked at approximately $124,500 in early October 2025, then shed roughly 31% to close out the year near $86,000. That price drawdown alone would have been painful. Layered on top of it was a network hashrate sitting near all-time highs — meaning that more machines were competing for a smaller reward pool at a lower price. The result was a hashprice compression that drove the metric to its lowest level in five years. Hashprice — the amount a miner earns per unit of hashrate per day — had peaked around $63 per petahash per second per day in July 2025, then fell continuously through Q4 as price dropped and difficulty remained elevated. By March 2026, with Bitcoin trading around $69,200, Checkonchain's difficulty regression model pegged the average production cost across the network at $88,000 per coin. The gap between cost and revenue was nearly $19,000 on every block mined — a 21% structural loss for the average operator. When you are mining at a loss, you are not running a business. You are liquidating your infrastructure one block at a time. --- **The Difficulty Drop: A 7.7% Adjustment That Confirmed the Exodus** In March 2026, Bitcoin's network difficulty recorded one of its sharpest downward adjustments of the year — a 7.7% decline following a period in which average block times had stretched to approximately 12 minutes and 36 seconds, well above the 10-minute target. In Bitcoin's automatic adjustment mechanism, slower block times mean fewer active miners. Fewer active miners means the network reduces difficulty to restore the intended cadence. That 7.7% drop is not a technical event. It is a confirmation that a meaningful share of the mining fleet went offline — either powered down, repurposed, or sold off. The machines that exit during a difficulty compression are almost always the least efficient ones: older-generation ASICs consuming 25-30 joules per terahash that cannot come close to breaking even when hashprice is this low. Their departure does not solve the industry's structural problem, but it temporarily relieves pressure on those that remain. The floor is being cleared. The question is whether the ceiling rises before the clearing process becomes permanent for the companies now attempting the transition. --- **MARA: $1.1 Billion in Bitcoin Sold, 15% of Staff Gone, AI Is the New Plan** The most significant corporate restructuring in the mining space came from MARA Holdings, formerly Marathon Digital Holdings and one of the largest publicly traded Bitcoin miners in the United States. Between March 4 and March 25, 2026, MARA sold 15,133 Bitcoin for approximately $1.1 billion. The proceeds were used to retire convertible debt — bringing the company's total debt load from roughly $3.3 billion down to approximately $2.3 billion, a reduction of 30%. The $88.1 million in cash flow savings projected from the debt reduction was notable. The layoffs that followed were harder to dress up. In early April 2026, MARA cut approximately 15% of its workforce across multiple departments in a restructuring that Bitcoin Magazine described as affecting the company broadly and simultaneously. The context for these moves is a net loss of approximately $1.3 billion reported for full-year 2025, driven by the post-halving margin compression. MARA has explicitly positioned itself as a "digital energy and compute provider" rather than a pure-play Bitcoin miner, pivoting toward AI and high-performance computing infrastructure with the stated intention of selling Bitcoin from its treasury "from time to time" throughout 2026 to fund the transition. The company that once measured its success by terahashes and block rewards is now measuring it by data center capacity and AI compute contracts. --- **Bitfarms Exits Completely: Rebranding to Keel Infrastructure** If MARA's pivot was dramatic, Bitfarms' exit from the Bitcoin business was total. The Canadian mining company announced in late March 2026 that it is targeting zero Bitcoin on its balance sheet as it pivots entirely toward AI and high-performance computing infrastructure. Bitfarms, which reportedly still held 1,827 BTC at the time of the announcement, confirmed it has begun selling its holdings and plans to continue doing so "opportunistically into strength." The company is rebranding entirely — to Keel Infrastructure — and is building out a 2.2 gigawatt AI and HPC data center pipeline alongside a re-domiciliation to the United States. The phrase "maximize free cash flow before selling the miners" captures the approach precisely: keep the existing mining rigs running for as long as they generate positive cash flow, then liquidate them. The wind-down is gradual by design. What is not gradual is the ideological departure. Bitfarms was a Bitcoin miner. Keel Infrastructure is an AI data center company that used to mine Bitcoin. That distinction is not semantic — it represents a complete reallocation of capital thesis, from proof-of-work energy consumption as a value creation mechanism to GPU compute as a value creation mechanism. --- **Riot Platforms: 3,778 BTC Sold in Q1, Mining More Than It Kept** Riot Platforms, which has historically been among the most committed "HODL" miners in the industry — refusing to sell produced Bitcoin in order to build a treasury reserve — broke from that posture in Q1 2026. The company sold 3,778 BTC over the quarter, generating approximately $290 million in revenue at an average price of $76,626 per coin. Over the same period, Riot mined only 1,473 BTC — meaning it sold more than 2.5 times what it produced, drawing down its balance sheet reserves to cover operational costs. Total BTC holdings dropped to 15,680 coins at quarter's end. The sale was framed as a response to operational cash flow needs driven by high energy costs and equipment investment requirements, but the market read it correctly: when a company that has spent years positioning its BTC treasury as a core strategic asset starts selling faster than it mines, the economics have forced a change in philosophy. Riot's Q1 figures are not capitulation in the technical on-chain sense — the company is not shutting down. But they represent a philosophical capitulation, a concession that holding Bitcoin through a sustained period of below-cost production is no longer a strategy the balance sheet can support. --- **The Mined in America Act: Geopolitics Arrives at the Hash Farm** On March 30, 2026, Senators Bill Cassidy (R-LA) and Cynthia Lummis (R-WY) introduced the Mined in America Act — a piece of legislation that dragged the Bitcoin mining industry squarely into the frame of US-China geopolitical competition. The bill's premise is stark: approximately 97% of all Bitcoin mining hardware globally is manufactured by two Chinese companies, Bitmain and MicroBT. The United States currently contributes roughly 38% of global network hashrate — a dominant share — but produces almost none of the machines generating it. The Mined in America Act proposes to phase out mining rigs from "foreign adversary"-linked manufacturers in certified US mining facilities, direct the National Institute of Standards and Technology and the Manufacturing Extension Partnership to help US manufacturers develop domestically produced, secure, and energy-efficient mining hardware, and codify President Trump's executive order establishing the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve — with a preference for US-mined Bitcoin flowing into the reserve. The bill intersects with the broader April 2 tariff announcement in a particularly sharp way. If the proposed 125% tariff on Chinese-origin goods is fully applied to mining hardware, a machine that currently costs approximately $6,000 could exceed $14,000 — a cost increase that makes the economics of replacing aging fleet hardware essentially impossible for any operator not sitting on a multiyear supply agreement or a domestic hardware partnership. The Mined in America Act is, in one reading, the legislative solution to the tariff problem it cannot actually solve in the near term, because domestic ASIC manufacturing infrastructure does not currently exist at the scale needed to replace Chinese supply. --- **The Solo Miner Anomaly: $210,000 From 230 Terahashes** Against a backdrop of corporate distress, layoffs, and forced BTC liquidations, a quiet moment of mathematical improbability arrived on April 6, 2026. A solo miner using approximately 230 terahashes of hashrate — a setup worth perhaps $10,000 in modern hardware — solved block number 943,411 on the Bitcoin network and collected approximately 3.139 BTC in rewards, worth around $210,000. The miner operated through Solo CK Pool, which charges a 2% fee and directs 100% of the block reward to whoever finds the block. The probability of a 230 TH/s miner finding a block on a network running hundreds of exahashes per second is roughly equivalent to winning a significant lottery. It happens because Bitcoin's proof-of-work mechanism is probabilistic — every valid hash has an equal chance regardless of the machine producing it, weighted only by speed. The story would be a footnote in any other week. In a week where MARA was laying off 15% of its staff and Bitfarms was rebranding away from Bitcoin entirely, a 230 TH/s home miner collecting $210,000 reads as something more resonant — a reminder that the network itself cares nothing for corporate structures, efficiency ratios, or pivot strategies. It keeps producing blocks at its intended cadence regardless of who survives to mine them. --- **Where the Industry Goes From Here** The structural trajectory of Bitcoin mining in 2026 is a consolidation story with a hard floor set by energy costs and a soft ceiling set by Bitcoin's price. The companies that survive the current compression are those with electricity rates below $0.07-$0.08 per kilowatt-hour, fleet efficiency at or below 16-18 joules per terahash, and balance sheets that do not require Bitcoin to be above $88,000 to cover operating costs. For everyone above those thresholds, the path forward runs through one of three exits: pivot to AI/HPC, sell to a larger operator, or shut down. The May 8 NFP report and the April 28-29 FOMC meeting will matter to miners as much as to any other market participant — because a Federal Reserve that refuses to cut rates in a tariff-shock environment keeps Bitcoin's near-term ceiling compressed, and a Bitcoin below $80,000 means the average miner's production cost sits $8,000 above every coin they pull from the block reward. The Mined in America Act is a long-term reshaping of the supply chain that could take five to seven years to produce domestically manufactured alternatives to Bitmain and MicroBT hardware. The tariff shock is a present-tense cost increase that hits import orders placed this quarter. The gap between those two timelines is where the mining industry's most difficult year may yet be hiding.
3
5
1
0