BA

Boeing Price

BA
$207.75
-$4.55(-2.14%)

*Data last updated: 2026-04-07 16:01 (UTC+8)

As of 2026-04-07 16:01, Boeing (BA) is priced at $207.75, with a total market cap of $163.66B, a P/E ratio of 74.05, and a dividend yield of 0.00%. Today, the stock price fluctuated between $206.96 and $211.98. The current price is 0.38% above the day's low and 1.99% below the day's high, with a trading volume of 610.94K. Over the past 52 weeks, BA has traded between $176.77 to $254.34, and the current price is -18.31% away from the 52-week high.

BA Key Stats

Yesterday's Close$212.30
Market Cap$163.66B
Volume610.94K
P/E Ratio74.05
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%
Dividend Amount$2.05
Diluted EPS (TTM)2.90
Net Income (FY)$2.23B
Revenue (FY)$89.46B
Earnings Date2026-04-22
EPS Estimate0.47
Revenue Estimate$22.03B
Shares Outstanding770.91M
Beta (1Y)1.128
Ex-Dividend Date2020-02-13
Dividend Payment Date2020-03-06

About BA

The Boeing Company, together with its subsidiaries, designs, develops, manufactures, sales, services, and supports commercial jetliners, military aircraft, satellites, missile defense, human space flight and launch systems, and services worldwide. The company operates through four segments: Commercial Airplanes; Defense, Space & Security; Global Services; and Boeing Capital. The Commercial Airplanes segment provides commercial jet aircraft for passenger and cargo requirements, as well as fleet support services. The Defense, Space & Security segment engages in the research, development, production, and modification of manned and unmanned military aircraft and weapons systems; strategic defense and intelligence systems, which include strategic missile and defense systems, command, control, communications, computers, intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance, cyber and information solutions, and intelligence systems; and satellite systems, such as government and commercial satellites, and space exploration. The Global Services segment offers products and services, including supply chain and logistics management, engineering, maintenance and modifications, upgrades and conversions, spare parts, pilot and maintenance training systems and services, technical and maintenance documents, and data analytics and digital services to commercial and defense customers. The Boeing Capital segment offers financing services and manages financing exposure for a portfolio of equipment under operating leases, sales-type/finance leases, notes and other receivables, assets held for sale or re-lease, and investments. The company was incorporated in 1916 and is based in Chicago, Illinois.
SectorIndustrials
IndustryAerospace & Defense
CEORobert K. Ortberg
HeadquartersArlington,VA,US
Official Websitehttps://www.boeing.com
Employees (FY)182.00K
Average Revenue (1Y)$491.55K
Net Income per Employee$12.28K

Learn More about Boeing (BA)

Gate Learn Articles

Top 10 Chinese Crypto Podcasts for 2024

Discover the top 10 Chinese crypto podcasts of 2024! This article highlights shows like "Whispers from Millionaire Crypto Traders," "Blockchain Trends," and "Bro! I Took a Walk in Block," which discussed trending topics such as cryptocurrency, blockchain technology, and Web3. Whether you're new to crypto or a seasoned expert, these podcasts offer the latest industry insights, professional analysis, and unique perspectives. From market trends to technical breakdowns, expert interviews to investment strategies, these podcasts will help you stay informed about the crypto world and improve your knowledge and decision-making skills. Check out these top-quality podcasts and kick off your crypto journey today!

2024-11-01

Beosin: Southeast Asia's On-Chain Fund Flow and Risk Analysis Report

An in-depth exploration of the current state of the cryptocurrency market in Southeast Asia, analyzing the characteristics of on-chain fund flows, potential financial risks, and their connections to illicit industries. The report also provides recommendations such as strengthening regulations, improving users' risk awareness, and promoting technological innovation.

2024-12-25

LD Capital: An Overview of New POW Tokens: A Victory for Miners, Communities, and Mining Machine Makers?

This article provides a brief analysis of the reasons for the rise of POW programs, and takes stock of new POW projects with a market capitalization of over 40 million, as well as current problems.

2023-12-12

Boeing (BA) FAQ

What's the stock price of Boeing (BA) today?

x
Boeing (BA) is currently trading at $207.75, with a 24h change of -2.14%. The 52-week trading range is $176.77–$254.34.

What are the 52-week high and low prices for Boeing (BA)?

x

What is the price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of Boeing (BA)? What does it indicate?

x

What is the market cap of Boeing (BA)?

x

What is the most recent quarterly earnings per share (EPS) for Boeing (BA)?

x

Should you buy or sell Boeing (BA) now?

x

What factors can affect the stock price of Boeing (BA)?

x

How to buy Boeing (BA) stock?

x

Risk Warning

The stock market involves a high level of risk and price volatility. The value of your investment may increase or decrease, and you may not recover the full amount invested. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. Before making any investment decisions, you should carefully assess your investment experience, financial situation, investment objectives, and risk tolerance, and conduct your own research. Where appropriate, consult an independent financial adviser.

Disclaimer

The content on this page is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, financial advice, or trading recommendations. Gate shall not be held liable for any loss or damage resulting from such financial decisions. Further, take note that Gate may not be able to provide full service in certain markets and jurisdictions, including but not limited to the United States of America, Canada, Iran, and Cuba. For more information on Restricted Locations, please refer to the User Agreement.

Other Trading Markets

Boeing (BA) Latest News

2026-03-03 03:39

Gate Contract Stock Zone will launch RTX, GD, NOC, BA, TSM, WMT, and COST perpetual contracts globally on March 3, supporting leverage trading from 1-20x.

Gate News bot message, according to the official Gate announcement on March 3, 2026 The Gate Contract Stock Zone will launch live trading of perpetual contracts for RTX (Raytheon Technologies), GD (General Dynamics), NOC (Northrop Grumman), BA (Boeing), TSMC (Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company), WMT (Walmart), and COST (Costco) at 12:00 (UTC+8) on March 3, 2026. Settled in USDT, supporting 1-20x long and short positions. RTX is a top global aerospace and defense conglomerate; GD is an integrated land, sea, air, and space defense group known for nuclear submarines, main battle tanks, and Gulfstream business jets; NOC is a giant in aerospace and defense technology, specializing in stealth fighters and strategic missiles; BA is the world's largest aerospace group; TSMC is the world's largest and most advanced wafer foundry; WMT is the largest physical retailer globally; COST is a leading membership-based warehouse club retailer. Additionally, the Gate Index Zone will launch live trading of the GER40 (Germany DAX 40 Index) perpetual contracts at 12:00 (UTC+8) on the same day, settled in USDT, supporting 1-20x long and short positions. GER40 is a core blue-chip index of the German stock market and one of the most important stock benchmarks in Europe.

2026-02-19 22:00

Traditional Finance Decline Alert: BA Dropped Over 2%

Gate News bot message: According to the latest data from Gate TradFi, BA has dropped 2% in the short term, with current volatility significantly higher than recent average levels, and market activity has increased.

2026-02-12 02:15

Elon Musk: xAI recently underwent restructuring to improve operational efficiency

Foresight News reports that Elon Musk tweeted that "xAI recently underwent restructuring to improve operational efficiency. As the company develops, its organizational structure must evolve continuously, just like any living organism. Unfortunately, this means we have to part ways with some people. We wish them all the best in their future endeavors. We are currently actively hiring." Previously, several members of xAI, including co-founder Wu Yuhui and Jimmy Ba, posted messages indicating they would be leaving their positions.

2026-02-12 02:11

Elon Musk reorganizes xAI into SpaceX, and the Grok controversy combined with the departure of the founding team sparks a major upheaval in the AI landscape?

Elon Musk announced on X that his artificial intelligence company xAI has begun organizational restructuring and "needs to part ways with some employees" to improve operational efficiency. He did not disclose the scale of layoffs or specify whether departures are voluntary or involuntary, but emphasized that the company is still hiring, indicating that xAI will continue to advance its core products and computing infrastructure. This adjustment comes amid ongoing turbulence within xAI's founding team. Co-founders Jimmy Ba and Tony Wu confirmed their departure this week. Previously, several core members including Igor Babuschkin, Kyle Kosic, Christian Szegedy, and Greg Yang had also left. The team changes are happening concurrently with strategic shifts. More notably, last week Musk announced that SpaceX completed its acquisition of xAI through a record all-stock deal. According to public documents, after the merger, SpaceX’s valuation is approximately $1 trillion, while xAI’s valuation is around $250 billion. Currently, xAI owns and operates the social platform X, and is also developing the Grok chatbot and image generation systems. Musk had previously acquired X through xAI, with the transaction finalized in March 2025 in the form of stock. While rapidly integrating on the capital front, xAI also faces regulatory pressures in multiple regions. Authorities in Europe, Asia, and the United States are investigating whether Grok involves the unauthorized generation and dissemination of explicit images, including content involving minors, potentially violating multiple data and content compliance red lines. This risk adds uncertainty to xAI’s commercialization and international expansion. Industry experts believe that integrating xAI into SpaceX signifies Musk’s effort to build a super-technology matrix spanning aerospace, social platforms, and artificial intelligence, aiming to create a closed loop in computing power, data, and applications. However, the loss of founding team members and regulatory scrutiny pose challenges to this path. Whether xAI can maintain its footing in the competition with OpenAI and Google will depend on governance, product safety, and its ability to adapt to global regulations.

2026-02-11 07:16

xAI Co-founder Jimmy Ba resigns, marking another key team change after Wu Yuhui

ChainCatcher reports that xAI co-founder Jimmy Ba announced his departure. In a tweet, Jimmy Ba stated that today is his last day at xAI, expressing gratitude to Elon Musk for bringing the team together to complete this journey, feeling proud of the xAI team’s achievements, and that he will continue to stay in close contact as friends. Previously, ChainCatcher reported that xAI co-founder Wu Yuhui announced his departure yesterday.

Hot Posts About Boeing (BA)

StrawberryIce

StrawberryIce

4 hours ago
I’m Yi, a professional stock trader. [TaoGuBa] When trading, aesthetics determines the ceiling. My approach: focus only on the most proactive core, and reject passive following-for-arbitrage. There’s no ambiguity here—only real-time, real-money “cannon before the horse” thinking and entry/exit logic while watching the tape. I don’t touch stocks I can’t understand; I heavily position in ones I can. New friends—watch it for three days. If you gain nothing, please unfollow. OK brothers, it’s another steady, no-frills day. Next, I’ll bring everyone today’s post-market recap. **I. Today’s Trades:** **Cuiwei Shares, watch at the limit-up.** After the call auction ended, I made my personal trade public: if Cuiwei Shares can get to the 2nd limit-up, then I’ll consider holding it. Interested friends can go verify by checking my past records. **II. Today’s Recap** Before we talk about the recap, everyone should first review the pre-market script I wrote this morning on your own. **2.1 The pharmaceutical sector: a “known” contest with flaws** In the pre-market strategy, for pharma I’ve already stated my stance clearly: **Tianjin Yaoye**, my pre-market view was: today running to a 7th turnover limit-up is a likely event. But for me personally, the points of contention weren’t sufficiently set up. In reality today’s script—from my personal angle—should have been the script for Friday instead. On Friday, I said clearly: Tianjin Yaoye’s participation point is the reclosure buy point after volume-expanding, benign turnover divergence. On Friday, Tianjin Yaoye had volume expansion, but it didn’t release much divergence. Today is a sector repair day. For me, Tianjin Yaoye only needs to enjoy the low-level “back-boost,” and a benign turnover to 7th limit-up is enough. But the early auction was very clear: The absolute low-position **Zhongyao Holdings**—the auction did not show aggressiveness Other trend core names inside the sector, like Minovo, Wanbangde—though they grabbed at the open, it was also just funds doing a “known” repair scramble, not something beyond expectations Tianjin Yaoye still became the most proactive issue after the auction ended; it’s still stronger than low-position—however, this “strength” is within expectations: the strength of a known, front-page-style game, not beyond expectations From my perspective, the early pharma sector had flaws: **low-position wasn’t supplying strength; it felt like “a small horse pulling a big cart,” mainly relying on Tianjin Yaoye.** Early on, pharma diverged; Tianjin Yaoye passively exploded the board. The subsequent reclosure didn’t drive a rebound in the sector. **Conclusion: Tianjin Yaoye’s definition is already “known”—funds are more inclined toward Tianjin Yaoye’s group-bonding attribute.** And if you look from the group-bonding perspective, then Tianjin Yaoye isn’t actually the most core for the day. The most core is definitely Falsheng, which accelerated on the “known” break after abnormal-move. So from the group-bonding angle, Tianjin Yaoye is more like funds doing arbitrage with a group-bonding pattern, which lands in the inferior spot. And the reason I can understand it but I don’t do it is this: when group-bonding starts to go “known,” especially when the seat-driven profit effect is already beginning to accelerate, you have to watch out—once the chips loosen and the group-bonding starts to dissolve, it becomes easy to not be able to catch the move. Sometimes, for a tape like this, even if you can understand it, you still don’t necessarily need to do it. **Better to miss than to do wrong.** **2.2 Finding an expectation gap: cross-border payments** If pharma doesn’t match my participation point intraday, then I have to look for something that has **logic and an expectation gap**. **Friday’s clue:** You can Capital went up at one-word limit-up; it was stimulated by news—Hormuz Strait to use RMB settlement. **This news has an expectation gap:** The stablecoin that’s been炒作 since last year, and cross-border payments炒作 before—both represent the big logic of **RMB internationalization** When the news about using RMB settlement came out on Friday, at essence it was an important milestone for RMB internationalization But on Friday, the market didn’t significantly “ferment” the news; fundamentally the reason is You can Capital’s stock behavior: **“If it tops at one-word, it must bust.”** **Friday’s tape signal:** You can Capital and Cuiwei Shares are linked as funds choose strength to top: You can Capital is a **capacity stock**, topping on strength Cuiwei Shares is a **sentiment stock**, topping on height Funds have already started to operate for the next sector “main uptrend” run—that’s what I often say: **capacity stocks top on strength; sentiment stocks top on height.** But on Friday, You can Capital blew up the board, and the back-row followers fell back one after another—Friday didn’t manage to ferment successfully. **This morning’s auction signal:** The whole sector was抢筹 the opening “anomaly-move” momentum: You can Capital—on Friday’s 100 billion board bust, it couldn’t reclose; today’s auction was **red-open** Lakala, Sifang Jingchuang—within the sector, the flexible capacity names; they also抢筹 in the auction with **red-open** After the sector’s auction ended, it was all in抢筹 mode ![](https://img-cdn.gateio.im/social/moments-51e571879f-153b267d25-8b7abd-badf29) Conclusion: As the current “position-holder” limit-up within the sector, **Cuiwei Shares—gaming this expectation gap—is much better than staking on the known, hard-headed group-bonding bet.** For the next steps, the sector’s anchor is extremely clear: **just watch You can Capital’s stance.** If You can Capital doesn’t give negative feedback, then the whole sector is likely to enter a wave of the main uptrend period; then we’ll take it one step at a time. **2.3 Other tape signals: the power sector’s early move volume** Intraday, funds’ focus still stays on the chemistry sector where the fermentation is strongest, and on localized group-bonding—fundamentally it’s about doing against the index cycle; after all, the index is still not seeing volume expansion. But foreign capital starts working tomorrow—will it be able to coordinate with the index to expand volume? Also, there are a few interesting signals on the tape to include in observation: When pharma diverged early, many sectors were “holding position” and flowing back; Shunhao in commercial aerospace (weekend news about space computing power), and the power sector’s counter-rally. As for the one trying to separate from Tianjin Yaoye early on, that was **Hua Dian Liaoning**. It was clearly trying to position itself against Tianjin Yaoye early. ![](https://img-cdn.gateio.im/social/moments-694ef390df-5a5ea9626e-8b7abd-badf29) But what’s interesting is: after Tianjin Yaoye reclosed, the entire power sector was in a pullback state, yet Liaoning’s follow-through was visible—still there was抢筹 into the close. Here it’s already showing that funds are starting to front-run the move—for example, the old dragon rebound after Tianjin Yaoye’s board break. The Falsheng and Guosheng we did together before were actually based on this logic. 举一反三: when Liaoning breaks the board, the Hangdian that carries the profit effect—will it continue to be chosen by funds? It’s left for everyone to think about. **III. Summary** Brothers, today we went steady and focused—only one trade: **Cuiwei Shares, watch at the limit-up.** The logic chain is very clear: The pharma sector has flaws; low-position can’t provide strength; only Tianjin Yaoye’s group-bonding attribute → give up Group-bonding known-accelerates (Falsheng); watch out for it to disintegrate → don’t chase Cross-border payments has an expectation gap; Friday didn’t ferment; this morning auction抢筹 → game the sector’s “position-holder” Cuiwei **The essence of trading isn’t making a move when everyone else can understand it; it’s moving only when you have certainty and the logic is smooth—this is determinism.** **The article is short, but the essence is because there’s no nonsense.** **The foundational stuff has been written many times already. For the next level of articles, we’ll talk more with everyone about improving understanding.** **Lastly, I want to say: in the previous trading system post, it received more than 850 likes. It’s the most-liked time since I came to TaoGuBa, and also the most times it was saved.** **It also reflects a question on the side: that article should be something that people today needed and that everyone recognized.** **On this path of trading, I’ve walked it—I know how hard it is.** **So if I summarize the detours I’ve walked for everyone, and it helps you avoid a few years of detours, then it won’t be in vain.** Brothers, my task is done—now it’s on you. If you feel the intraday thinking and the recap are helpful, please support the heat with a small points and “Jia You” coupon. Tap the free likes as well—600 likes. I’m just driven by love; if even the likes don’t meet expectations, I feel it’s a bit not worth it. 600 likes, thank you everyone. Once the data is reached, tomorrow we continue with pre-market + intraday. Also, if you haven’t followed yet, give it a follow—tomorrow come to squat for the pre-market and intraday. Thanks to the brothers who rewarded the previous post. @Waymo@姗姗来迟8@H111c, the top three! Thanks to W General,姗姗 General, and C General for the points—wishing your account long-term success! @安仔520@几克@韭韭归溢@聚龙湖小作手@青春过了一大半@大涨红途666@朱事顺意888@六道云庐黄波@羡鱼twig@小若曦888 @风飞云@海定波宁@陈筱群@等待黑夜的烟火@潮流时尚a72@咋地zadia@立志上龙虎@WeiWeieasy@冲锋的号角之启航@法号了然@股市新生LWH@始终成长的韭菜@诺亚悟道@异异@涅槃重生2018@庐州火少@san九@自行和一@川流不息999@方尽一@炒过去炒未来@Panmmmm@灼灼335@道法自然而然也@跳崖土豆@果壳里的世界@隆中人@每个人都有自己的绘梨衣@强悍如水@顺牛而动@大锅煮饺子@余牧尘@人民路饼摊@Sunshine掏空@低调做人111@安娜悟道@mariana111 Thank you to the above 50 brothers for the points and rewards—wishing everyone’s account long-term success! @H111c,@云淡风轻z@阳春三月6789@斌咖咔@橙捷@几克@明小少@羡鱼twig, thanks for the “Jia You” coupons from the friends above!
0
0
0
0
StrawberryIce

StrawberryIce

5 hours ago
**Short-term trading is an art. It uses a market that shifts by the second as its canvas, uses keen insight as its brush, and uses decisive execution as its paint. A true masterpiece isn’t born from chasing random fluctuations; it’s completed by accurately capturing and resonating with the market’s core “intensity”—drawing direction where sentiment is boiling, laying out structure as sectors rotate, and then putting the finishing touch at the moment individual stocks lead the rally. ————The Compounding Artist**[Taoguba] **Artist’s Dining Hall — Post-Review:** **Thank you, everyone, for your support! Since we can’t get onto the newcomer board right now, our visibility in terms of traffic exposure is not as good as before. So, please, family members, use your cute little hands—help with liking, commenting, and rewarding in one go, help boost some人氣. Writing a post every day as a review is also something that requires坚持, and it’s also something that needs a source of motivation. You can provide those motivations. Thank you, family members!** Although the index’s performance today wasn’t very strong, individual stocks generally moved higher, giving a really solid repair行情. However, volume power is still sluggish. Intraday volume was only 1.61 trillion. The last time it was like this was around December 17. After that, the market directly ran 17 straight days of gains, starting a major行情. But back then the situation is still very different from today, so you can’t simply copy-paste it. Another wave of consecutive-gain big行情? It’s only emphasizing that with volume continuing to stay weak, the market will ultimately have to choose a direction to release volume—up or down. It can’t be confirmed. And if volume continues to stay weak, it’s purely a game of on-exchange funds. Exiting with profits early is the safest. Even though the index gave a broad rebound today, a close look at the candlesticks shows they are completely contained within Friday’s bearish candle. That means today’s broad-based rise doesn’t necessarily imply the index will deliver a continuous rebound. The direction is still uncertain, and there remains a risk of a further drop. In the earlier stage, part of our logic was left-side positioning—after the index fell sharply, attempting to bottom-pick on the left side. But after the index has broken down consecutively, the trend has changed in some way. At this point, it’s more about right-side positioning. For the short term, you need to focus more and run with lighter positions—that’s the safest approach. Our expectation for the index is that it may test lower tomorrow. With hundreds of stocks hitting limit-up intraday, the next day will be hard to continue holding/adding positions. Coupled with the uncertainty in the offshore negotiation news, we still need to proceed cautiously. ![](https://img-cdn.gateio.im/social/moments-021dfc9318-1503be3f55-8b7abd-badf29) **Today’s Market Analysis:** **From the index,** after two consecutive days of freezing at a low point, the market delivered a broad-based up move. With no major rebound effect coming from abroad, the index’s repair today was much stronger than overseas. Near the end of the morning session, the index briefly pulled back. When it was about to break below the zero line, it still forced itself back into positive territory. Overall, the repair exceeded expectations. **From the volume,** the total traded value across both markets was 1.61 trillion, a further缩量 of -2.54% versus yesterday, down 42.1 billion. Volume has shrunk for three straight days—clear signs of a competition for scarce liquidity (stock-inventory game). **From sentiment,** across both markets there were 93 stocks hitting limit-up, 4 hitting limit-down, 3,804 advancing, and 1,300 declining. Yesterday’s limit-up stocks and today’s overall average advance were 1.56%. The intraday profit-making effect has clearly been repaired. Individual stocks saw a broad-based up move. The only issue is that 25 stocks had board-failure (炸板) intraday. With 93 limit-up stocks on top of that, in a shrinking-volume market, closing/holding so many limit-ups can be difficult. The difficulty of providing some premium (溢价) the next day also increases. ![](https://img-cdn.gateio.im/social/moments-3544035cfe-856d959092-8b7abd-badf29) ![](https://img-cdn.gateio.im/social/moments-71e4107f40-e785399e96-8b7abd-badf29) **From the sectors,** both markets traded in a red-and-green oscillation with the whole day ending red. Some themes rotated strongly. Due to geopolitical conflict, the chemical sector fueled continuously throughout the day, with nearly 30 stocks hitting limit-up. In the pharma sector, after a brief split in the early session, the sector’s core quickly flowed back; Tianjin Pharmaceutical (津药药业) hit a seventh consecutive limit-up. In the cross-border payments sector, sparked by news about RMB settlement, Cuiwei Stock (翠微股份) hit two consecutive limit-ups. Other sectors—domestic chips, memory, nonferrous metals, and sports, etc.—rotated quickly. Market sentiment was somewhat repaired, and short-term mood focused on core sectors. ![](https://img-cdn.gateio.im/social/moments-306db5f6a7-74d8bd37c6-8b7abd-badf29) **Artist Chat: Sectors:** **1、Pharmaceuticals** In the pharma direction today, there was no new one-word limit-up補涨 from low positions to provide an assist. After Tianjin Pharmaceutical quickly surged to a limit-up at the open, seeing that its “followers” didn’t have much action, it directly炸板. Later, after XinTian Pharmaceutical (新天药业) reached the board, Tianjin Pharmaceutical began to do a comeback/final repurchase closure (做回封). Today also counts as Tianjin Pharmaceutical’s first real test of sufficient turnover (full turnover). It also blasted out a huge天量. Although it managed to pass the test intraday, tomorrow’s situation is still hard to say. The key is mainly what regulators say—whether they will allow Tianjin Pharmaceutical to continue opening up the short-term height. Today, Tianjin Pharmaceutical’s popularity is indeed very high, but you can also clearly sense that it lacks a certain ability to drive the sector. It didn’t bring a rapid sector-wide return flow. It’s more biased toward high-level group-hugging stocks. We don’t yet know how Tianjin Pharmaceutical will fare with regulatory expectations. Even the trend-type stock Wanbangde (万邦德) is moving slowly while trying to avoid/keep within bounds (卡异动). These are currently problems within the sector. Once regulation tightens, and if the “avoid abnormal movement” fails and differences emerge among high-level names, it will definitely bring some negative feedback to the sector. When gaming in recent days, you need to anchor to the high-level situation—watch how divergence at the high level evolves. Focus more on low-position补涨 candidates, because low positions have some room for补涨 and the cost-performance (性价比) is relatively high. **2、Electric Power** After short-term oversold conditions, electric power finally welcomed a rebound from oversold today. The biggest bear early on, Guangxi Energy (广西能源), after three consecutive limit-downs, opened today and—first time—it didn’t immediately sell off again. You could clearly see the intent to stop the decline. Even though the sector overall repaired, besides one limit-up from East (东方), the gains in GCL Energy Tech (协鑫能科), Energy Saving Wind Power (节能风电), and Huadian Liaoning Energy (华电辽能) were a bit larger. Other names only gave small red candles. Earlier, for the candidates going from 3 to 4 (三进四), Xinhonggang (新中港) and Tongda Shares (通达股份) had different outcomes: one did a back-cover (反包), and the other failed to hold the board. This is exactly the issue in what we’ve been emphasizing about the cost-performance of sectors during the ebb-tide/gaming退潮期. Other than the repair certainty that Huadian Liaoning Energy offers being relatively high, and the fact that recent high-visibility high-level names repaired a bit more strongly, the strength of repair in other previously popular stocks is more random. That creates some difficulty in stock selection. In short, sectors in the ebb-tide phase are not recommended to participate. Even a bounce-reversal (反抽) during gaming can’t be certain how much strength it will deliver. Instead, you might miss other better opportunities and行情 up above. Currently, electric power is not only in the ebb-tide phase, but also has some risk-avoidance characteristics. More likely, it may only show a bit when the index environment is not good. **3、Computing Power** Computing power moved unusually on Friday. In theory, it should be the result of holiday-related news gaming, but in practice it didn’t ferment into anything particularly hot. The call auction on Friday where Yuntai Zhiliann (云赛智联) straight-hit limit-up opened low and didn’t provide any premium. Even Hangjin Technology (航锦科技), which was sent a letter and put on file over the holiday, directly hit the limit-down. So it’s easy to understand that the sector didn’t perform much intraday. Tonglian Electronics (利通电子) did once cap the board in the morning, but later it was quickly smashed open. In the afternoon, there was some mild return flow during intraday trading, but clearly the力度 wasn’t enough. Every time we think computing power should perform, it fizzles out. When we think “it’s not行,” it pops up obviously again. The whole sector moves in a very tangled way. Even if it hits limit-up intraday, it’s easy to炸板; if it holds, it’s still hard to provide premium the next day. If this continues, participating funds’ confidence will only weaken further. Good temperament and stock behavior both need time to be cultivated. Going forward, you still need to wait until the sector truly produces a core with strength and continuity—only then does the cost-performance of participating become high. Otherwise, it’s more like waiting/lying in the shadows, and certainty isn’t very high. **4、Commercial Space** Commercial space today was overall weak at the open. On Friday’s early session, Tongyu Communications (通宇通讯) quickly hit limit-up, but today in the auction it didn’t directly provide any premium. After opening slightly high, sector stocks basically probed down quickly. Based on the fact that Friday’s negative news was resolved on the day, funds cashed out that day. Today there wasn’t a further large-scale selloff—giving the lurking funds a dignified exit opportunity. At present, the only sector name with a comparatively better trend is Tianyin Electromechanical (天银机电). It’s a trend-type group-hug stock selected within this kind of sector. Today it also provided a relatively sufficient low-buy opportunity. Tongyu Communications also has a slightly nicer chart shape. Other relatively core names have basically already tested prior highs and are now starting to pull back. For the short term, if there’s no continued news catalyst about commercial space, the sector probably won’t break out into another big行情. There’s currently no particularly suitable gaming entry point. It’s best to wait until there is related launch expectations, then combine that with the price action to see whether it’s necessary to step in. **5、AI Hardware** The AI hardware direction was overall just so-so today. In the early session, it kept quickly surging and then falling back. In the sub-precision field of fiber optics, although Tongding Connectivity (通鼎互联) rapidly got to the board, Huiyuan Communications (汇源通信) and Farseng Sheng (法尔胜) also continued to open as one-word limits with strength. But the group-leading stock in the space—Changfei Optics and Fibers (长飞光纤)—didn’t move strongly today, which caused the whole sector to be unable to lift overall. The optical module direction also surged and then pulled back. Only after the afternoon did the “three brothers” warm up somewhat. Under the sustained aggressive push from Jizhong Xuchuang (中际旭创) and Xin Yisheng (新易盛), the Shenzhen-Chinext (创业板) index was finally pulled back into positive territory. The fiber-optics sector is naturally anchored by Changfei Optics and Fibers. Changfei is a “mingpai” group-hugging stock. This falls into the category of “believe early and believe it again.” For such agency/insti-led names, as long as the trend hasn’t turned bad, it’s mainly about buying on dips. Most likely it will attempt to test the prior high. If it reaches the prior high and there’s a behavior with explosive volume, then you need to retreat in time and take profits quickly. Then patiently wait for the next pullback stabilization. **Every morning there are news headlines and a精选 list of core stocks. Family members, pay attention to the Artist—keep up with the steps, don’t get lost. The early-session content is basically the sectors that I整理 out which the market already has expectations for!** Family members, like the post—also you can reward points or give encouragement!** ![](https://img-cdn.gateio.im/social/moments-e26bc67782-37a7443b0a-8b7abd-badf29) ![](https://img-cdn.gateio.im/social/moments-2847149e0d-909e549a68-8b7abd-badf29) **I’ve heard too many big principles and market theories. A lot of people still don’t know how to put them into practice.** So I share my own “Intensity Pyramid System.” It can bring you growth, and it’s worth taking seriously. People who always want to get things for free at zero cost can only stay at the surface layer of trading. Those who touch the initial intention—hoping the ones who are fated enough to follow this post won’t be stuck in confusion. But the market will evolve all the same. So likewise, our “Intensity Pyramid” system will also evolve. In the future, within a dynamically changing market, I will also add new “dimensions” to it based on different market conditions, making it more suitable for different market cycles. **
0
0
0
0