Morrisss

In my X group, someone is discussing business models for retirement in China. I started chiming in… Actually, many people believe that with the growing number of Chinese seniors, the retirement care industry and the silver-economy will have huge opportunities. But this logic ignores a core problem: money doesn’t magically appear just because there are more elderly people. The issue with retirement in China is not fundamentally a business opportunity problem—it’s a wealth distribution problem. China isn’t entering an aging society naturally from a fully prosperous stage; instead, it is rapidly

Many founders’ real moat is not capital, not traffic, but trust. In many cases, what users buy is not the product itself, but their recognition of a person’s values, judgment, and patterns of action.

Testing the Dogecoin curve dogecoin:native

How do you manage your crypto assets, and what wealth stage does it reveal:
People who own cryptocurrency generally use hot wallets.
People who own $100,000 generally use exchanges.
People who own $500,000 generally use hardware cold wallets.
People who own $1,000,000 generally use multi-signature wallets.
People who own $10,000,000 generally use trust management.

As children grow up, it isn’t about becoming rebellious—it’s about finally gaining the ability to see their parents in a new light.

Trading is a game between people; trade is the exchange between civilizations; economics is the competition between institutions.

The best life is the continuous process of finding and becoming a better version of yourself.

In China, why do people with the most barren thinking often like to say “the wisdom of our ancestors”? Because they lack the ability to make independent judgments, so they can only borrow past authority to support their views. “Our ancestors said so” becomes the lowest-cost form of argumentation—no logic needed, no verification needed, just a supposedly irrefutable identity label. Many people equate the ancient with what is correct, equate inheritance with value, and wrap the limitations of the past as profound wisdom. The real issue isn’t whether there is tradition, but that some people stop

Someone privately messaged me and asked: on X, you’ve been posting too many pornographic tweets, and your brain is taken over by sexual desire—how should you deal with it? Actually, on the surface, this is a problem of sexual desire; at its core, it’s a problem of attention and life direction.
The human brain naturally seeks immediate feedback, and pornography, entertainment, short videos, and the like are all high-stimulation sources. When a person doesn’t have bigger goals to carry their attention, they’re easily drawn to these low-cost stimuli.
Real self-discipline isn’t about suppressing d

In financial markets, the scarcest thing isn’t a trading signal, but a judgment system for people operating in complex environments.

Many top investors actually share a common trait: they don’t survive by trading; they survive first, and only then ultimately become great traders.

Why do many women more easily develop hostility toward attractive women, while men often are willing to be friends with handsome, outstanding people? Behind this is not simple jealousy, but the different competitive logics between men and women. Everyone instinctively compares, but the dimensions being compared are not the same. For many women, factors such as appearance, attractiveness, and social recognition have long been important competitive resources; so when a prettier, more popular woman shows up, it can easily trigger subconscious comparison and defense. Among men, appearance is usual

Research suggests that celebrity worship lowers IQ (pathological adoration). Essentially, people who follow celebrities more are often more likely to fall into extreme, irrational worship states. They usually show differences in certain cognitive abilities and psychological traits.

On X, what “things other people said” do you find confusing, and why would the other party say it that way? Post it here, and I’ll analyze it for you.

Someone in X’s group asked me about business opportunities. I replied: For things without barriers, follow the business cycle; for things where you have a moat, stick to long-termism.

In China’s history, the most common tactic in struggles has been to first attach moral labels to the opponent. Package yourself as a gentleman (a good person) and portray the other side as a villain (a bad person). Once the opponent is defined as “immoral,” striking at them is no longer seen as a contest of interests; instead, it is framed as upholding justice. As a result, political competition can easily turn into a moral trial. In the end, the goal is not to find the correct answer, but to obtain recognition from the highest authority and completely defeat the opponent. This is also the kin

Lonely people may seek a sense of connection through sexual desire; anxious people may find comfort through food; empty people may gain temporary satisfaction through shopping; stressed people may temporarily escape through games, alcohol, or endlessly scrolling information. In essence, these behaviors are all about people looking for compensation for an inner lack. And truly stable people aren’t those who have no loneliness, anxiety, emptiness, or stress—they’re those who have the ability to be loved and to love themselves, without needing to constantly rely on external stimuli to fill themse

Why is it that the poorer someone is, the more they hope that someone will come and save them? It’s not that the poor are just lazy. Rather, people who have been in a prolonged state of scarcity are more likely to develop an expectation of “external rescue.” And those who truly change their fate often go through a shift in mindset: from “Who can change my life?” to “How can I improve my chances of changing my life?” This is, in fact, also a change in a person’s cognitive position. So the core of the issue isn’t “Why do the poor expect to be saved?” but this: when a person has been in a disadva

The world is undergoing profound changes. In the future, short-term tricks, information advantages, and arbitrage opportunities will gradually decrease. Those who can truly get through the cycle are the ones who choose the right direction, create real value, build long-term credibility, and always remain kind.