Morrisss

Someone asked me whether I believe in “face reading.” I said: Yes, but I only treat it as a reference. A person is the result of countless variables working together. Their appearance, demeanor, and habitual expressions may reveal traces left by their long-term lifestyle and behavior, so face reading is not completely devoid of information. But it is only one of countless variables, and its weight may be very small. It can be observed and used as a signal, but it cannot be treated as a conclusion. What truly determines a person’s direction is never a face, but rather their long-term choices, e

Why do some cultures emphasize “assuming good intentions,” while Chinese culture more commonly emphasizes “preventing problems before they arise”? Fundamentally, it is not about who has greater faith in human nature, but who bears the cost when trust fails. When rules are stable, contracts are enforceable, and institutions can provide a safety net, people can choose to trust first, because there are mechanisms for correction if that trust proves misplaced; when rules are unstable and holding people accountable is costly, the price of treating bad people as good is far greater than that of trea

In a country, the roots of crime lie in humanity’s predatory instincts and lust for power; but when crime becomes widespread, persistent, and even systemic, its roots often lie not merely in individuals, but in the government, because it has the ability to amplify “localized evil” into “systemic evil.”

Someone said: I understand many of the principles you talk about, so why haven’t I changed? I said: Because you don’t know how to apply those principles to yourself. “Understanding principles” and “knowing how to apply them” are two completely different abilities. Many people don’t lack an understanding of principles; they lack the “ability to apply them to themselves.” Understanding a principle only means that you can comprehend it; real change happens when, faced with a specific problem, you can apply that principle to yourself, gain a new understanding of yourself, assess the situation, and

A subscriber asked me: What is the biggest danger when the old order transitions to a new one? If you were once a vice president at a company, the CFO of a group, or the CTO of a technology company, you may have been highly successful, earned a high income, and controlled substantial resources. But when the new order truly arrives, you may suddenly realize: I used to be very capable, but after leaving my former organization, industry, and rules, I no longer know what I can do or how to make money again. That is because much of many people’s value in the past did not come entirely from themselv

Poor people tend to substitute avoiding losses for creating incremental gains.

If you still have to rely on being employed by others to earn an income and a sense of security, it will be difficult for you to truly participate in the distribution of the future.

Many people lack not money, but the ability to earn independently.

Did you know? Every minute and every second we live in this world is actually new. Because time never flows backward, and a person’s past can almost never happen again. Yet many people’s bodies have already arrived at today, while their emotions are still stuck in yesterday. What truly traps a person is never what happened in the past, but the fact that what happened back then is still deciding your emotions, judgments, and choices for you today.

People with high cognitive ability are better at making nonsense sound true.

True wealth is the ability to refuse certain things, give up certain things, and choose certain things.

The three stages of the AI wave:
First stage, capital: energy, chips, computing power, and data centers, solving “Can AI exist?”
Second stage, creators: ChatGPT, Claude, and AI apps, solving “How do people use AI?”
Third stage, Agents: identity, payments, permissions, data, procurement, transactions, and execution APIs, solving “How can Agents act independently?”
The first two stages are about building AI; the third is about building the world of Agents.

When social media platforms start repeatedly pushing videos that you normally never watch or search for, you should be cautious. These contents may not be driven purely by commercial goals, nor are they necessarily just “the algorithm thinks you’ll like them.” For example: repeatedly pushing livestreams explaining the stock market by unknown hosts; stories about the prosperity of northern Myanmar and opportunities for ordinary people to make money and turn their lives around; or policies that repeatedly emphasize being “good for the public.”
Viewed individually, a piece of content may not seem

In the AI era, old-school thinking is: use AI to help people solve problems. New-school thinking is: help Agents solve problems between one another. Because in the future, more and more business models will occur directly between AI and AI.

The trend is: carbon-based civilization plays on its own, and silicon-based civilization plays on its own.

I’m pretty lazy in some respects, and only diligent when it comes to writing. If you subscribe to me, remember to send me a DM, and I’ll add you to X’s subscriber group. I’ll answer and participate in discussions about questions asked here at any time.

Regarding communication difficulty: human-human > human-AI > AI-AI.