Square
Following
Hot
News
Profile
Share your thoughts
placeholder
Article
Americans Are More Pessimistic About Their Finances Than During the 2008 Financial Crisis - According to figures highlighted by The Kobeissi Letter, a record 41% of US consumers now expect their financial situation to deteriorate over the next 12 months.
post-image
$ELSA That scared the hell out of me—I almost got liquidated. If it had been pushed up to 0.013, I would've been liquidated. Thanks, you damn market maker, for sparing me
post-image
ELSA+5.80%
  • 2
Trenches
ZIG
Z
bade
b
ZIG
0x8c...1145
Market Cap
$.
Change
.
24h Vol
$.
Holders
.
BTC
B
bade
b
BTC
C5xp...pump
Market Cap
$.
Change
.
24h Vol
$.
Holders
.
HIGH
H
bade
b
HIGH
7ymF...high
Market Cap
$.
Change
.
24h Vol
$.
Holders
.
STONK
S
bade
b
STONK
6GmA...UNgx
Market Cap
$.
Change
.
24h Vol
$.
Holders
.
CORLA
C
bade
b
CORLA
0xba...7777
Market Cap
$.
Change
.
24h Vol
$.
Holders
.
What is happening now?
#bitcoin
BTC-0.67%
$HUT HUT plunged 21.98% in 24 hours, with the price at 48.88 and a low of 47.63. Trading volume was down to just 3.3M—this isn’t a pullback; it’s a liquidity stampede. BTC is flatlining ahead of the Fed’s rate decision, with all the money waiting for Powell to speak. Altcoins and mining stocks are being drained first, and high-beta names like HUT fall three times harder than BTC—that’s a hard rule. Everyone is betting on rate cuts, but look closely: HUT fell from 62.69 to 47.63, a 24% drop. How much did BTC move over the same period? This is the real volatility of mining stocks during periods
HUT-23.00%
BTC-0.67%
  • 8
  • 2
#SKHynixFallsNearly7Percent
Korean chip stocks pull back sharply, weighing on KOSPI and testing AI memory trade.
SK Hynix traded down 7.02% to 7.74% intraday to 1,288,000 won on Nov 5, with prints at 1,269,000 won down 9.10% and ADR down 5.12%. Peer Samsung Electronics fell 5.05% to 5.73%, later closing down 7.57% to 201,500 won. Benchmark KOSPI fell more than 4% to around 5,417, hitting one-week low. Open at 5,580.09 down 103.71 points, low at 5,459.70 down 227.68 points or 4.01%, and 5,570.99 down 1.98% by 09:15. Sell program sidecar was triggered, with heavy foreign selling focused on tw
SK Hynix-9.45%
SKHY-5.16%
BTC-0.67%
  • 3
$CAP It’s up 29% in a day and now sits at 0.0947. Anyone chasing in at this point is basically handing a red envelope to those who got in earlier at 0.0732. I’m disciplined about buying dips and selling rallies: I provide plans, not emotional reactions.
First, the data: 24-hour low of 0.0732, high of 0.1005, and trading volume of 113 million. Turnover is high, meaning tokens are changing hands rapidly. At 0.0947, the price is only 6% below the high, so it’s consolidating near the top—not at a dip-buying level.
My plan is clear: Entry: Wait for a pullback to the 0.086–0.089 range and buy in bat
  • 5
  • 2
$NEAR bears are guarding this trendline like it's their family inheritance
Every attempt gets rejected from here
Let's see how long they can keep doing this before the chart starts acting differently
Still i am expecting one pullback then a big rally
Maybe a megaaltszn who knows?
NEAR+1.17%
ethereum:0x8ed97a637a790be1feff5e888d43629dc05408f6 bouncing sharply off broken trendline support.
Bullish continuation active as price aims for a major run to $0.0480.
post-image
ETH-1.26%
How Can an Ordinary Trader Build Their Own Trading Review System?
Many traders remember the few trades that made them a lot of money.
They remember which token doubled, which time they bought at exactly the right moment, and which trade would have earned them more if they had held on a little longer.
But ask them:
Why did you lose money last month? Which mistakes keep recurring? Is your trading method actually effective?
Many people may not be able to give a clear answer.
The problem isn't necessarily a lack of market knowledge. Sometimes, what's really missing is a way to keep consistent reco
post-image
I've seen this movie before.
$BTC / 1M
post-image
BTC-0.67%
📡 Signal Card Quick Update
Source: BlockchainBaller Signal: $SOL Long entry: 96 Target: 98.14 / 100 / 102 Stop loss: 93.5 Time: Not specified
Speaking of which, Sis reposted this trader’s $AIN trade earlier today, and now they’re back again. That quick trigger finger is true love 😂
As usual, Sis is just sharing the trade. Whether to follow and how much to put in is up to you, babes. Getting carried away on a single trade can get you burned~
Shared for personal record-keeping only; not investment advice. #AAOI高速光模块放量,Q3财报能否超预期? AAOI -10.30% xAAOI -10.66%
SOL-0.77%
AIN+3.85%
AAOI-7.41%
$BTC is testing crucial overhead resistance levels following a strong impulsive recovery leg.
Price action is consolidating near key structural thresholds as we await further market confirmation.
Patiently monitoring the levels for the next high-probability setup.
#Bitcoin #BTC #CryptoTrading
post-image
BTC-0.67%
  • 4
  • 2
$AGENCY Hahaha😂No tears left to cry
Sigh, this kind of news is actually all bullish for hardware; the money saved just goes toward buying hardware. Unfortunately, nobody cares about this stuff anymore, and it doesn’t matter now. With the Democrats waving the flag of halting data centers, these positives have instead become noise 🫠🫠
Buy the dip, hold long term. Discord is in my profile.
post-image
Market update
live-cover
LIVE1,602
What Is the Funding Rate? Why Can Perpetual Contracts Continue to Generate Holding Costs Even When Prices Do Not Move Significantly?
In cryptocurrency trading, many people focus only on price movements after opening a position and overlook the funding rate. For perpetual contract traders, even if prices move sideways for a long time, holding a position may still incur additional costs or generate income as long as the funding rate is not zero.
First, what is the funding rate?
The funding rate is a mechanism in perpetual contracts through which longs and shorts make periodic payments to each ot
post-image
Made $41K trading BTC, profiting from both bullish and bearish bets.
8373 opened a Polymarket account on November 1 and traded only six Bitcoin up-or-down markets.
Biggest gain:
Bullish, around 32 cents
$12,974 → $40,041
Profit: around $27,068
Profile:
But these two trades caught my attention more:
Eastern Time, 9:00–9:05 a.m.:
Bearish: $11,663 → $14,019
Eastern Time, 9:00–9:15 a.m.:
Bullish: $13,980 → $24,235
Both markets started at 9 a.m. Opposite directions, different expiry times. Both positions won.
These weren't bets hedging each other in the same market. The five-minute round settled be
post-image
BTC-0.65%
Democrats Take Congress, $TRUMP Drops Another 17%—Is It Time to Buy the Dip?
The U.S. midterm election results are in, with Democrats taking both chambers of Congress. Trump is now likely to face significantly more pressure to govern.
TRUMP is driven largely by sentiment and political expectations, while $WLFI also faces uncertainty related to the family business and regulation.
If the market starts pricing in investigations, impeachment, or tighter regulation, volatility could increase further.
On the 4-hour chart, the price has fallen steadily from its August high of 3.682 and is now aroun
post-image
TRUMP-0.95%
WLFI-0.16%
Load More

Join 40 M users in our growing community

⚡️ Join 40 M users in the crypto craze discussion

💬 Engage with your favorite top creators

👍 See what interests you

Trending Topics

GateLaunchesPoSECProofOfSecurity

930 Views461 Discussing

Beyond Proof of Reserves, Gate has introduced PoSEC, a new Proof of Security framework focused on how user assets are stored and protected. By disclosing the distribution of assets across cold storage and hot wallets, users can directly understand Gate’s storage structure and risk coverage under extreme scenarios. Gate’s latest cold storage coverage ratio stands at 104.58%, meaning cold-storage assets alone are sufficient to cover all user assets. PoR verifies whether reserves are sufficient, while PoSEC shows how assets are stored and how risks are covered — together forming a more complete asset security framework. Share your results and experience! [👉 Learn more](https://gate.com/proof-of-security)

BTCBackAbove80K

58.53k Views41.31k Discussing

DemocratsWinBothChambers

21.04k Views467 Discussing

View More