Square
Following
Hot
News
Notifications
Profile
Share your thoughts
placeholder
Article
Is the question "Are there funds in the vault?" still sufficient?

While the question of whether there are enough funds in the vault has been asked of cryptocurrency exchanges for years, the true critical point lies elsewhere: are those funds held in a wallet vulnerable to online attacks, or in a physically isolated vault?

A series of security breaches and losses amounting to millions of dollars across the industry has painfully demonstrated that the concept of "Proof of Reserves" is not enough on its own. This is because Proof of Reserves merely verifies the balance between the ledger and th
Dr.Han
Recently, a series of thefts have occurred across the industry. Every security incident affects not just one company, but everyone’s trust in the crypto industry.

It also reminds me of why we started working on Proof of Reserves (PoR) in 2020. The idea was simple: if users entrust their assets to an exchange for safekeeping, they have the right to know whether those assets are fully backed. Trust isn’t about believing promises; it requires verifiable evidence.

Over time, PoR was adopted by more and more exchanges and became a very important part of the industry’s security framework.

When change happens, it can look like just an experiment. Only in hindsight do we realize that it has gradually become an industry consensus.

Over the past few years, we have consistently made platform security and user funds our top priorities, continually optimizing and improving our exchange security measures. But these recent incidents have made me realize that Proof of Reserves alone is not enough for an exchange.

PoR can tell users whether an exchange has sufficient asset reserves, but it doesn’t answer another equally important question: how exactly are those assets stored? No exchange can promise that it faces no risk of theft, but how much of its assets are in cold wallets and how much in hot wallets? In the worst-case scenario, would the assets in cold storage still be enough to cover user assets? This information can be disclosed to users transparently; the industry just doesn’t yet have a public, unified measurement standard.

So today, Gate launched Proof of Security (PoSEC). With PoSEC, users no longer have to simply take an exchange’s word that “assets are safe.” They can directly view the cold storage coverage ratio, calculation methodology, and asset storage structure, with the relevant data verified through a third-party audit.

PoSEC introduces a straightforward metric: the cold storage coverage ratio. As long as this figure is at least 100%, it means that even if the assets in an exchange’s hot wallets were wiped out, the assets in cold storage would still be sufficient to cover all user assets.

Gate’s latest PoSEC cold storage coverage ratio is 104.58%.

Here, cold storage includes not only on-chain crypto assets, but also traditional off-chain assets involved in the platform’s business. For on-chain digital assets counted as cold storage, private keys are kept offline, asset transfers require multiple signatures, and transaction details are independently verified before signing. Traditional assets such as stocks and U.S. Treasuries are held by independent custodians and transferred and managed according to established authorization procedures. We are working with an independent third-party audit firm, and the report will be published on our official website once the audit is complete. We will also share more details over time.

Cold storage is important because keeping private keys offline can greatly reduce the risk of on-chain assets being exposed to online attacks. The higher the cold storage coverage ratio, the greater the safety buffer for user assets in extreme situations. This is increasingly drawing attention from regulators. Recently, South Korean regulators have also been discussing raising the required proportion of exchange assets held in cold wallets.

When Proof of Reserves went live in 2020, I had no idea how far it would go.

This time, we also hope PoSEC will become more than just a security measure at Gate and can become an industry consensus. If more platforms are willing to disclose their hot and cold wallet structures and let users verify how their assets are protected, users will have a genuine standard for comparison, and the industry’s overall security threshold will rise.

True trust should be built on public, transparent, and verifiable data.

PoSEC’s calculation methodology and cold storage standards are now public. We welcome our peers to refer to them, and all users to scrutinize them.

gate.com/proof-of-security

Don’t trust, verify.
BTC-0.67%
GT-2.41%
ETH-1.26%
SOL-0.77%
XRP-1.15%
  • 1
  • 1
🇺🇸🇮🇷 US LAUNCHES "TASK FORCE IRON GATE" AGAINST IRAN!
The US has launched a 20-member "Task Force Iron Gate" to block ground routes used for Iran's weapons and illegal shipments.
This task force will disrupt Iranian supply networks along land borders and the Caspian Sea.
Through a naval blockade, Iran has already been prevented from exporting $25B worth of crude oil.
post-image
Trenches
ZIG
Z
bade
b
ZIG
0x8c...1145
Market Cap
$.
Change
.
24h Vol
$.
Holders
.
BTC
B
bade
b
BTC
C5xp...pump
Market Cap
$.
Change
.
24h Vol
$.
Holders
.
scamsem
s
bade
b
scamsem
41Wp...pump
Market Cap
$.
Change
.
24h Vol
$.
Holders
.
IDOL
I
bade
b
IDOL
0x3b...ab07
Market Cap
$.
Change
.
24h Vol
$.
Holders
.
Diamond
D
bade
b
Diamond
5VCE...pump
Market Cap
$.
Change
.
24h Vol
$.
Holders
.
INSTITUTIONAL CRYPTO FLOWS ARE SENDING A CAUTION SIGNAL.
Latest finalized ETF data for November 6:
➡️ Bitcoin ETFs: -$411.92M
➡️ Ethereum ETFs: Approximately -$93.19M
Bitcoin recorded ~$1.92 Billion in outflows across Six finalized sessions.
Ethereum Also recorded ~$2 Billion in outflows across Last 29 finalized sessions.
This doesn't guarantee a market decline.
But sustained institutional outflows are worth monitoring alongside price action and liquidity.
When does institutional demand return?
#BitcoinETF #EthereumETF
post-image
BTC-0.31%
ETH-0.91%
$ETH Currently at 2238.15, 24H +0.45% (range: 2216.94–2254.25). 1H is weak, RSI 38.95, price below EMA20 at 2243.64, volume ratio 0.14; 4H is weak, RSI 15.19, price below EMA20 at 2265.83. A sustained hold above the 2254.25 resistance could signal continuation; a break below the 2218.92 support would weaken the structure. On review, confirm whether price holds above 2254.25 and reclaims 2218.92; volume is only 0.14x. A breakout without volume, or a breakdown without a subsequent reclaim, invalidates the setup. Markets are volatile; for observation only.
post-image
ETH-1.26%
#btc No matter where you opened the short, set a stop-loss at 812😗
ETH at 2310, if it breaks above with volume, exit half the position first
post-image
BTC-0.65%
$ONE It's about to crash, don't enter anymore. Short quickly🈳🈳🈳🈳🈳🈳🈳
ONE-1.19%
  • 8
Free couple profile pictures, feel free to use them

$ZEC ‌
ZEC+1.29%
“Every Penny You Earn Is Another Person’s Loss”
A lot of people don’t like hearing this, but it’s the nature of futures trading.
Futures are a negative-sum game
Futures themselves create no value; they only transfer money from one person to another.
And every time money changes hands, the exchange takes a fee, while longs and shorts also pay funding fees to each other.
So the total amount of money on the table keeps shrinking.
There’s only one reason you can make money: someone else loses more than you do.
Let’s do the math: a 0.1% fee for opening and closing a position, 5 trades a day, and 1,
post-image
BTC-0.65%
ETH-1.23%
If you feel bad about wasting money...
In 2021, someone bought Jack Dorsey's first tweet NFT for $2.9 Million
Now, it's worth just $4
post-image
“The More Indicators You Load, the Faster You Die”

I once saw an account with seven indicators stacked on the screen:
MACD, KDJ, RSI, Bollinger Bands, Fibonacci, volume, and one he had written himself.
I asked him, “When all seven give you a signal at the same time, which one do you listen to?”
He froze for three seconds, then said, “Whichever one looks right.”
More ironically, some of his biggest losses that year happened during “indicator confluence.”
Three indicators all signaled bullish, so he went all in. Then one bearish candle wiped them all out.
Indicators are shadows of price, not th
post-image
BTC-0.65%
🔥Gold slammed on the brakes right after surging. The real battle between bulls and bears is still ahead!

As of 22:26 Beijing time on November 7, XAU's latest full close was around 4,081. It has quickly recovered from around 3,881 recently, rebounding about 4.46% over the past 5 days. But it failed to hold above 4,152, showing that buying support at lower levels is solid, while overhead selling pressure is also significant.

On the news front, the latest U.S. nonfarm payrolls rose by 165k and the unemployment rate was 4.1%. Strong employment is supporting the dollar and Treasury yields, which
GLDX-0.40%
PAXG+0.37%
People with These 6 Traits: I Urge You to Stop Immediately》
I reviewed the liquidation accounts I’ve seen over the past few years, and the traits were astonishingly consistent.
I’m not trying to scare you. If you match 3 or more, stop for three months and don’t touch futures.
① Feeling anxious when you’re not watching the market
Watching while eating, driving, or using the bathroom.
It’s not that you love trading; you’re using market movements to fill an emptiness inside.
90% of the trades people like this make are to relieve anxiety, not to make money.
② Unable to sleep when you lose—or when
post-image
BTC-0.65%
ETH UPDATES
live-cover
LIVE1,348
🔹 OpenAI CFO: Data center investments will not change due to the midterm elections.
live-cover
LIVE1,136
$ZEC Currently at 1263.59, 24H -7.65% (range 1261.0–1377.57). 1H is weak, with RSI at 11.05, price below EMA20 at 1303.27, and a volume ratio of 0.55; 4H is weak, with RSI at 41.67 and price below EMA20 at 1289.46. A sustained hold above the 1377.57 resistance could signal continuation; a break below the 1261.0 support would weaken the structure. Review whether 1377.57 holds and 1261.0 is reclaimed; volume is only 0.55x. A breakout without volume, or a breakdown that is not reclaimed, invalidates the setup. Market volatility is high; for observation only.
post-image
ZEC+1.16%
This frog is showing strength when the market isn't exactly making life easy

$PEPE /BTC keeps grinding higher

Now imagine the market actually turning supportive

Some people are going to remember PEPE exists only after it starts printing ridiculous candles
post-image
PEPE+0.97%
my weakly screen time report just came in.
X: 69 hours.
sleep: 4.20 hours, all of them during a video about sleep.
coffee: the tumbler was refilled 6.9 times. on twosday.
post-image
$BTC has closed red for four consecutive weeks.

A fifth would mark its longest weekly losing streak in over two years.

I feel like this “controlled” selling could reverse aggressively once the time is right.
post-image
BTC-0.67%
  • 1
Found something freaking awesome—wow, 1x leverage and up 20% in a day! (Follow me and I’ll post profit and loss charts every day.) Let’s see how much I end up making #量化合约
post-image
Load More

Join 40 M users in our growing community

⚡️ Join 40 M users in the crypto craze discussion

💬 Engage with your favorite top creators

👍 See what interests you

Trending Topics

USAIStocksHitHard

19.66k Views3.67k Discussing

U.S. stocks sold off sharply on Thursday, November 5 (UTC). The Nasdaq closed down around 5.5%, entering correction territory, while the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index plunged roughly 12%, with chip stocks including $NVDA and $AMD posting steep losses. Beyond profit-taking, investors are growing concerned about the pace of AI data center construction, capital spending, and future returns on investment. The key question now is whether the AI sector’s lofty growth expectations need to be repriced. Where do you think the next opportunities will emerge: chip stocks, tech giants, or other sectors?

USNonfarmPayrolls

30.93k Views4.32k Discussing

StakeOnLaunchpoolToShare450KVLX

7.83k Views810 Discussing

View More