GateUser-14cb5f72

vip
Age 0.2 Year
Peak Tier 0
Security-focused, always emphasizing mnemonic phrases, hardware wallets, and permission management to the point of being annoying. I'd rather earn a little less than have to write another apology statement.
The BITA structure is interesting; selling call options to collect premiums + holding IBIT is like adding a yield filter to Bitcoin. Institutions are starting to compete for returns.
IBIT4.63%
BTC0.49%
View Original
CoinNetwork
Crypto news, Blackstone Group has advanced the listing process of its Bitcoin Income ETF to a critical stage, submitting registration documents to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). According to Form 8-A filed on June 11, Blackstone's iShares Bitcoin Income ETF is registered to list on Nasdaq, with the ticker symbol BITA. Bloomberg senior ETF analyst Eric Balchunas stated that Blackstone's application usually indicates an approval within a week, and it is expected that $BITA will go live next Thursday. The fund aims to combine Bitcoin-related investments with income generation, planning to collect option premiums by selling call options while holding assets related to Blackstone's iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT).
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Alibaba executives have changed again; the appointment of a new leader for DingTalk indicates that the strategic emphasis on cloud + AI is being increased.
View Original
CoinNetwork
CryptoWorld News reported that, according to The Paper, Chen Yusen, a former member of Saitech’s board of directors, has taken over as CEO of DingTalk, while the original CEO, Chen Hang, has stepped down. Chen Yusen was appointed to the Saitech board in December 2021 and previously served as Vice President of Alibaba Cloud Intelligence Group and head of the AI agent product mulerun.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Primary market chases dreams, secondary market crushes valuations—this bubble in the AI industry chain is really squeezing hard. SpaceX is actually super popular: 4x oversubscription. Capital always goes after the top-tier narratives.
View Original
Furan86999
SpaceX faces a frenzy of buying, but the AI industry chain is beginning to "bubble burst"?
In the past 24 hours, a very interesting phenomenon has appeared in the U.S. stock market:
On one side, SpaceX's IPO continues to ignite global capital enthusiasm. According to the latest news from Reuters, demand for SpaceX's IPO subscription has exceeded $250 billion, about four times the fundraising scale of $75 billion, making it one of the most watched tech IPOs in recent years. The market generally expects its valuation to approach $1.77 trillion, and the subscription enthusiasm is still heating up.
But on the other side, the AI industry chain has encountered a sudden valuation correction.
SemiAnalysis's latest research report points out that the commercialization progress of Co-Packaged Optics (CPO), which the market previously placed high hopes on, may be delayed, and the upgrade pace of some AI data center power architectures is also below expectations. After the news broke, the optical module and AI network infrastructure sectors experienced collective sell-offs. Companies like AAOI, Marvell, Coherent, and others saw declines of over 10% during trading, and AI concept stocks like AMD also came under pressure.
From a trader’s perspective, this actually reflects the most authentic state of the current AI market:
Capital is still crazily chasing the top-tier AI narratives.
Super unicorns like SpaceX, OpenAI, Anthropic are still the core targets of capital pursuit, with many institutions willing to prepay for the imagination space of the next ten years. The subscription scale for SpaceX has risen from about $150 billion a few days ago to over $250 billion, which is the most direct proof.
But for the secondary market, the story is no longer enough.
The market is beginning to reassess the actual landing speed of the AI industry chain, order fulfillment capability, and future profit cycles. If commercialization progress falls below expectations, valuation corrections will come very quickly.
In simple terms:
The primary market is crazily pricing for the "future";
The secondary market is starting to reprice the "reality."
For crypto investors, this situation is actually not unfamiliar. Just like in past bull markets, BTC and leading assets kept hitting new highs, but many concept coins had already entered the value reversion stage.
The AI track may be experiencing the same process.
Truly barrier-rich, cash-flowing, industry-leading companies are still attracting global capital, while those segments of the industry chain driven by expectations are undergoing the market’s harshest test.
In the coming months, the differentiation within the AI sector may only become more obvious. #Gate直通IPO认购SpaceX #SpaceX认购规模超2500亿美元 @Gate 广场
repost-content-media
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
mNAV falling below 1x indeed provides theoretical room for buybacks, but the 114.5 billion yen in book impairment in Q1 is too conspicuous; don't rush to interpret it as a positive.
View Original
CoinNetwork
Metaplanet: Consider stock buyback after mNAV drops to 0.92x
Metaplanet CEO Simon Gerovich stated that the mNAV dropping to 0.92x makes buybacks a potential capital allocation tool. The company holds 40,177 Bitcoin, with a Bitcoin NAV of approximately $2.54 billion and an enterprise value of about $2.35 billion. Gerovich emphasized that investors should not interpret this as buybacks already underway. The quarterly financial report disclosed in May shows a net loss of 114.5 billion yen (about $726 million) in Q1, mainly due to non-cash impairments caused by the decline in Bitcoin prices; however, revenue increased by 251% year-over-year to 3.08 billion yen.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Cycle-level correction structure, retail traders look at candlesticks, veterans look at the framework, be patient and wait for the five-wave to complete before acting.
View Original
TradingHeights
𝐁𝐈𝐓𝐂𝐎𝐈𝐍 𝐌𝐀𝐂𝐑𝐎 𝐖𝐀𝐕𝐄 𝐒𝐓𝐑𝐔𝐂𝐓𝐔𝐑𝐄 𝐔𝐍𝐅𝐎𝐋𝐃𝐈𝐍𝐆 🚨📉
🔶 $BTC monthly structure is entering one of the most important phases of the entire cycle.
🔶 According to the Wave perspective, Bitcoin may not be forming a simple correction — but a much larger multi-year corrective structure.
💎 𝐖𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐂𝐇𝐀𝐑𝐓 𝐈𝐒 𝐒𝐇𝐎𝐖𝐈𝐍𝐆
🔸 A major Diametric structure appears to have completed around the previous cycle peak
🔸 The following move developed into a complex corrective phase instead of a clean impulsive continuation
🔸 Current price action is being monitored as a possible Terminal wave-c decline
🔸 Internal waves continue showing corrective characteristics, matching Wave behavior
⚠️ 𝐊𝐄𝐘 𝐒𝐂𝐄𝐍𝐀𝐑𝐈𝐎
If this Terminal interpretation continues:
📉 Wave-3 could target deeper liquidity zones
🔄 Wave-4 recovery may follow
📊 Final wave-5 could complete the entire correction before the next major cycle begins
💎 𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐁𝐈𝐆 𝐏𝐈𝐂𝐓𝐔𝐑𝐄
Markets move in phases:
Accumulation → Expansion → Distribution → Correction
The crowd usually focuses on short-term candles…
Professional analysts focus on the full structure.
Patience wins the cycle. 🧠
#BTC $BTC ‌
repost-content-media
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Contract authorization is really like sleeping: you can live without turning on the lights or locking the door, but you always feel like something might go wrong someday… Especially those "unlimited" authorizations, which basically mean handing over the keys to your wallet’s faucet. No matter how secure the project team claims to be, it can’t prevent future contract upgrades, front-end hijacking, or you clicking the wrong button once. Recently, those new L1/L2s have started offering incentives to attract TVL, and everyone is rushing while complaining about mining and selling. I, for one, care
L11.71%
View Original
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
These past two days, I’ve been looking into that MEV “queue-jumping” setup again. Put simply: whoever can decide the order of transactions gets to capture the price difference. The biggest impact isn’t really those big players with scripts of their own—it’s ordinary people. You tap swap thinking you’ll be filled at the price you see, but then you get squeezed in-between, end up paying more slippage, and you may not even notice. The loss happens quietly. Sorting transactions sounds technical, but it’s really a fairness issue of “what place you get in the line.”
What’s even more annoying is that
View Original
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Lately, looking at governance voting has been a bit exhausting. On-chain, it says "decentralization," but when I open the delegation list, those top few addresses can easily dominate half the community... People delegate their votes to save trouble, basically packing their own opinions along with them. Not to mention some delegations include automatic re-delegation, looping around until all votes end up in the same handful of hands. Who exactly governance tokens are governing is really hard to say.
The NFT royalty war also looks a lot like this: creators want ongoing income, while trading plat
View Original
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Stop asking me, “Can we chase this hot trend?” To put it bluntly, the attention economy is just using your hand to press the FOMO button. My simple way is: when you see something trending, don’t look at the K-line first—check your wallet permissions and authorization records. If you can revoke, revoke it. Then calm down for 10 minutes before deciding whether to take action. The faster the rotation of hot topics, the easier it is to get “cut” by fees and fake links in places like cross-chain, airdrops, and memes. Lately, people have been talking about one region raising taxes and tightening com
MEME7.33%
View Original
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
This wave of hot topics really feels like scrolling through short videos—your eyes flick and you already want to click in, but your wallet gets tapped first… Now I’m forcing myself to be “slow” a little: when I see a brand-new narrative, I don’t chase it right away; I shut the link first, then decide the next day. Especially recently, phishing links have been popping up everywhere. If someone in the group drops an “airdrop/subsidy,” I treat it like a landmine. On top of that, hardware wallets are also out of stock, which just reinforces that I shouldn’t treat security as the last step. Plainly
View Original
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Node delegation volume surged to 10.2 million HYPE, directly jumping into the top six, and also accumulated KNTQ and HPL. Which narrative explosion is this setup waiting for?
HYPE10.44%
View Original
Original content no longer visible
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Whether these 411 BTC have been sold or not, waiting for this document is more anxious than waiting for an airdrop.
BTC0.49%
View Original
MarsBitNews
Strategy "Did you sell Bitcoin last week?" will be announced tonight
Mars Finance reports that Strategy will publish its latest 8-K at 20:00 Beijing time tonight to confirm whether it sold any Bitcoin last week. Previously, on May 29, it transferred 411 BTC to Coinbase, and on April 30, it received the same amount of BTC from Coinbase again, making it difficult for the market to determine whether selling was involved. Polymarket’s $8.95 million trading volume market “Did MicroStrategy sell any Bitcoin before May 31?” has entered a dispute period.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
I look at whether the project is actually getting work done. Instead, they’re watching the treasury spending first: whether the money going out lines up with the milestones—or whether it’s just stuck in “the next version” and “the next collaboration” forever. To be blunt, I’m not afraid of spending money; I’m afraid of spending without pacing, without explanations. The budget gets spent as casually as if it had passwordless payments… Ideally, I can see every expense tied to a deliverable—whether it’s something unglamorous but verifiable, like documents, audits, or data dashboards.
During that
View Original
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Recently, I’ve again been seeing people talk a lot about re-staking and shared security—they make the returns sound like they stack up layer by layer, which is genuinely tempting. But let’s be honest: don’t turn the layered returns into a “stable” illusion. If anything goes wrong in the underlying layer, everything above it will shake as well. On-chain, it just looks like there are a few extra buttons, but the risks are actually tied together.
It just so happens that these past couple of days, a certain mainstream blockchain was going to upgrade/maintain, and in the group everyone was guessing
View Original
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Whales playing in the Champions League on Polymarket are getting more competitive; injury time counts as 90 minutes, and understanding the rules thoroughly is key to winning.
View Original
BlockBeatNews
Pop the champagne early to enjoy the game—spending lavishly like a ten-million whale, major participant “lovelystuff,” has already locked in a profit of $4.4 million, with the market effectively settled.
On May 31, according to monitoring, the whale lovelystuff on Polymarket has almost settled the “90-minute win/loss” market for Paris Saint-Germain vs Arsenal, with profit of approximately $4.4 million (+61.29%). The market is determined by 90 minutes plus stoppage time: if Paris Saint-Germain wins, the result is “Yes,” otherwise it is “No.” lovelystuff still shows an unrealized profit of $186k in another market, “Arsenal to win the 2025-26 Champions League,” and if the match goes as predicted, the overall profit would be approximately $1.4 million.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
London-listed companies continue to accumulate BTC, and institutional entry remains steady
BTC0.49%
View Original
MarsBitNews
The Smarter Web Company increased its holdings by 9 Bitcoins, bringing the total to 2,878 coins.
Mars Finance News: According to official information, the London-listed technology company The Smarter Web Company increased its holdings by 9 bitcoins, bringing its total holdings to 2,878 bitcoins.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Recently, I've seen a bunch of project governance votes again, superficially on-chain democracy.
But when I click in, it's all delegated voting, and in the end, just a few big addresses hold the power...
Honestly, who does the governance tokens really govern? It might just be the retail investors' "sense of participation."
I'm not against delegation, after all, everyone doesn't have time to monitor proposals every day, but long-term delegation can easily lead to oligarchization:
You delegate your votes, and others can conveniently use them for other gambits, making it hard for you to h
View Original
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Watching on-chain data is like tracing the path of a massive ship—BlackRock’s recent inflow: is it adding to existing positions or the prelude to a brand-new deployment plan? Worth keeping a close watch.
View Original
BlockBeatNews
BlackRock deposits 2,448 BTC and 28,683 ETH into Coinbase
BlockBeats News, May 29 — According to Onchain Lens monitoring, BlackRock deposited 2,448 BTC (approximately $180 million) and 28,683 ETH (about $57.62 million) into Coinbase, and may continue to make transfers.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
The truncated average looks nice, but can we still trust it after tariffs distort the price structure? The core PCE moving upward is the real indicator.
View Original
MarsBitNews
Wosh prefers inflation indicators to fall to 2.3%, but economists warn that the true inflation may be underestimated.
Dallas Fed's April truncated mean year-over-year is 2.3%, lower than March's 2.4%, seen as evidence from Waugh regarding inflation improvement.
But several economists warn it may systematically underestimate the true pressure because tariffs have changed the price distribution, with large increases in items like gasoline and airline tickets and decreases in poultry and haircuts, potentially leading to an underestimate.
Core PCE in April was 3.3% year-over-year, still rising.
Standard Chartered and Harvard's Furman and others believe that the historical and predictive power of the truncated mean are both weak.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
The KPI anxiety among big companies has finally reached the AI department; canceling the leaderboard is quite a harsh move.
View Original
CoinNetwork
CryptoWorld News reports that, according to the Financial Times of the UK, Amazon (AMZN.O) has canceled the AI leaderboard to prevent employees from pursuing usage scores.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
  • Pinned