$COLLECT 0.0578 to 0.0592 only differs by 0.0014, but the trading volume of 15.9M is 2 million less than $CLO, indicating the market maker's position adjustment signal has already been exposed. I am experienced, so I will break down the fund flow steps directly; follow the script.

Step 1: Push the price up to sell $COLLECT. 24-hour increase of 43.51%, from a low of 0.0392 to a high of 0.0592, a rise of over 50%. The market maker dumped 15 million in chips between 0.058-0.059, locking in liquidity. Meanwhile, $CLO rose by 30.99% in sync, but the high of 0.1535 failed to set a new high, indicating the market maker is withdrawing funds from $COLLECT at high levels and shifting to buy back at low levels of $CLO. Data shows: $CLO's trading volume of 18.1M is 2.2M more than $COLLECT, but the fluctuation range is only 0.0462 (from 0.1073 to 0.1535), clearly showing signs of phased accumulation.

Step 2: Test the pressure with $CLO. Currently at 0.1458, with strong support at the previous low of 0.1073. If the market maker wants to continue accumulating, they will push the price down to around 0.135 before buying. Watch for a break below 0.142; if it happens, reduce your position. I’ve calculated that at least 30% of the 15.9M trading volume of $COLLECT is fake volume, with the market maker reversing positions to create heat, and the actual net outflow is about 6 million to $CLO.

Step 3: The next breakout point. For $COLLECT to break through 0.06, it needs 1.25 billion in capital, but volume has clearly decreased. Suggestion: buy $CLO on dips between 0.142-0.145, with a stop loss at 0.136 and take profit at 0.168. Do not allocate more than 15%. Short-term chasing of $COLLECT will likely result in being trapped; wait for a pullback below 0.05 before considering.

The market does not lie: two tokens rising simultaneously but with opposite fund flows, the market maker is playing a seesaw. I am Han Fei, who understands the market maker’s logic. If you don’t believe it, review the data. $