I only take one note: don’t just look at "IBC/message passing" when it comes to cross-chain; it sounds elegant, but honestly, every time you press the cross-chain button, you're handing your money over to a chain of components you have to trust—each source chain/target chain’s consensus and finality, the light client/verification logic responsible for message transmission, whether the relayer might go offline or act maliciously, the permissions and upgrade keys of the bridge contract, plus the layered "shared security/re-staking yield stacking" promises; after being burned twice, now I only ask one question: if something goes wrong in any part of this chain, can I cut my losses and withdraw? If not, I won’t cross.