Actually, everyone understands this. Project teams talk about roadmaps as if they’re worthless, but if you really want to see, look at how the treasury funds are spent and whether there are corresponding milestones being achieved after the funds are used. I would first check the on-chain multi-signature expenditures: are they for unavoidable expenses like audits/development/node subsidies, or are they just a bunch of marketing/consultant fees, split into small amounts and slowly disbursed… Honestly, the latter seems more like stalling for time. Then compare the cost line and the distribution of holdings to see if they’re claiming to build while secretly moving tokens out. Recently, before and after the upgrade of that mainstream public chain, everyone has been guessing whether the ecosystem will migrate. I’m actually more concerned about whether the project’s treasury has made advance migration plans, testnet rewards, and other concrete actions; if they only issue announcements without seeing the money and deliverables, I’ll just assume nothing has happened. I’ll wait until they finish the work before judging.