Newbies want to judge whether a project is "reliable," I usually don't look at the K-line first, but how they write and modify code. GitHub isn't about how lively it is; what's important is whether the upgrade records are clearly explained, if there are a bunch of temporary changes, who submitted the PR, and whether the core contributors have been working on it long-term. Don't treat audit reports as a talisman; it's better to see what they cover, whether high-risk issues are unaddressed, if fixes are thorough, and not just take a screenshot of "Audited" as a get-out-of-jail-free card.

As for multi-signature upgrades, in simple terms, it's about "who can control your funds." How many people are involved, what's the threshold, are the signers the same group, can the contract be easily replaced... these are much more important than a "roadmap." Recently, narratives about AI Agents and automated trading have been popular, but I care more about how much control they have over on-chain interactions, how failures are handled, and no matter how fancy the hype, if I can't understand the security, I just ignore it. There are many tutorials, but I prefer those that guide you step-by-step through submission records and audit texts, rather than just teaching you to recognize logos.