Added $Ont Looks v Bullish 🔥🚀

How much does Sun Ge love taking advantage—he even has to calculate 2.5 tons at $20.

locked in ethereum:native for next 1 year.

Fuck it I like my chances here solana:GUmbtfjSZkybSFgPibBcvwExEBdXwewJHR5PkTjzpump

I had just switched the software to the background, and it plunged in an instant. Is it playing hide-and-seek with me?
Actually, while everyone was still watching from the sidelines, I happened to notice that $BEAT was facing heavy resistance above. Every upward push fell just short, and volume failed to follow through—a typical weak-rebound structure. While others were rushing out, I instead felt that an opportunity for the bears had arrived.
The 3.2497 short position given while it was forming an intraday bottom is now at a current price of 0.1397, with the position up +43827.96%. Feeling g

$BTC AT 77.6K 🔥
Pullback just as predicted from 80K
Gave you the pump from 60K to 80K then the take profit and hedge area.
81,728 traders were liquidated, the total liquidations comes in at $381.01 million.

Bitcoin ETFs just had their strongest week since April.
$BTC ETFs pulled in $924.48M this week a pretty clear sign that demand is still there.
The 10-day inflow streak ended, but one week doesn’t erase the bigger picture.
Institutional money is still flowing into Bitcoin.
ETF flows are worth watching closely.

#BTCBackAbove81000
Bitcoin Rejected From $81K: Is $77,570 a Healthy Retest or the Start of a Deeper Correction?
$BTC ‌
Bitcoin's recent attempt to reclaim $81,000 has turned into a major test for the market. After pushing above the $81K level and briefly reaching approximately $81.3K, BTC failed to maintain the breakout and has now pulled back to around $77,570.
This changes the short-term market conversation significantly.
The key question is no longer whether Bitcoin can touch $81,000. It already did. The more important question is whether the rejection from $81K represents temporary profi

Schmid Insists Elections Must Not Disrupt the Fed: October Will Be Determined by Data, Not Politics
The Federal Reserve is once again facing a test that comes not only from inflation and the bond market, but also from U.S. politics. Ahead of the November midterm elections, investors are focused on the possibility that political agendas could influence monetary policy. However, Jeffrey Schmid, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, delivered a firm message: the elections should not influence the Fed’s decision at the October meeting.
This statement is increasingly important becau

Kurzweil’s timeline: AGI around 2029. Singularity around 2045.
He can be early. He can be late. The direction still holds.
The next two decades favor people who own assets, stay solvent, and remain in the market.
You don’t need the exact year - you need a position and a process to grow.

I just hit refresh, and it shot up as if I had startled it. During the intraday plunge, $WAL ’s rebound was weak, and the volume didn’t follow. With no one taking it higher, I directly opened a short above at 0.02703.

Checking again just now, it has already been pushed down to 0.02332, locking in +662.77%. Feels great, bro.

I’ve taken 80% off the table first, moved the stop-loss on the remaining 20% to breakeven, and will let the profits run downward without giving them back if it rebounds.

Being out of the market isn’t a sin; opening positions recklessly is the mistake. For those who ha

🚨 U.S. M2 MONEY SUPPLY HITS $23.22T!
» Global liquidity continues expanding
» Historically bullish backdrop for Bitcoin & Gold
More money. More liquidity. More attention on hard assets.

My girlfriend is urging me to go to sleep.
Logging off. Good night.

#ENASurgesOver15%InADay
ENA delivered its second big surge in one week on 27 August, closing the daily candle up 15.4% at $0.1701, and the move extended into 28 August where price printed an intraday high of $0.1899 — the token's highest level of the year — before a violent reversal dragged it back to around $0.1623 at the daily close. As of 29 August, 05:30 UTC, ENA trades near $0.1631, up about +1.25% on the 24-hour window, roughly 14% below that $0.1899 peak. This is a classic "good news, violent market" situation: a genuinely structural upgrade to ENA's tokenomics triggered a parabolic sp

$SUN "Black Hole 🌞 SUN ☀️" to the moon. ‌

I originally wanted to cut my losses and sacrifice them to the heavens, but the ritual failed—the meat cooked itself. 😅When it plunged intraday, the whole screen was glowing green. While everyone else was running, I focused on one thing: the rebound couldn’t even reach the key levels, and the buying support was as weak as paper. I said it then: don’t panic, this rebound is just here to feed people into the meat grinder. Let’s see how it performs.
Then $APT it drifted lower all the way from 0.9133 to 0.5367, and the +2926.63% gain finally provided the answer. 📉First close 80% to lock in profi

This trend doesn’t even require me to think—the account is dancing on its own. When I opened the charts this morning, I saw $CLO open higher again and then move lower, with a weak rebound. Every upward push was just short of breaking through, and the resistance above was obvious. I followed the momentum and entered a short at 0.12965. The price has now returned to 0.12226, with a return of +265.95%. Honestly, this move didn’t require staying up late to watch the charts; getting the rhythm right is better than anything. But the more money you make, the calmer you need to stay. I just closed 70

So sad! In fact, there was nothing wrong with the way I managed this trade. The position was small enough that there was no risk of liquidation; I only chose to cut the loss proactively because I was concerned that copy traders would not be able to hold on.
See, if they had held on, let alone making a profit, they at least would not have lost money.
Taking this opportunity, I also ask copy traders to be a little more patient with our trading. We always strictly control position sizes and risks. I hope this loss serves as a wake-up call for us! After all, nobody’s money comes easily. Failing on