GateUser-7919e6b9

vip
Age 0.1 Year
Peak Tier 0
I might be late to governance meetings, but I never miss a post-drinks recap. I'm good at turning disagreements into consensus, and sometimes I throw in a bit of sarcasm.
Recently looking at the project “trustworthy or not,” I actually check GitHub and the audit reports first instead—no pretending to know it all; I just want to see whether they really finished the work seriously. To put it simply, even beginners shouldn’t force themselves to chew through the code. There are many tutorials. I usually only look at the kind that teaches you to watch the update frequency, who is submitting PRs, and how issues are answered—at least you can tell whether the team is made up of real people.
Don’t treat audit reports as an “immunity card” either. Focus on three things:
View Original
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Last night, the group was arguing again about whether this project is reliable or not.
I was advising on the sidelines, silently clicking open GitHub…
Honestly, beginners shouldn’t rush to look at how advanced the code is; first, check if there are “signs of activity”:
Are there recent commits? Are people seriously responding in issues? Is there a post-mortem after a problem occurs?
Not the kind that last updated half a year ago and still pretends to be calm.
Don’t treat the audit report as a talisman; focus on:
Is the audit the latest version? Have issues been fixed? After fixing,
View Original
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
  • Pin