The third time I've seen someone use "address profiling" as an ID card: this is smart money, that is institutions, this is retail... Frankly, labels are quite convenient, but they can also be easily self-deluding. One person has dozens of addresses, and one address could also be a hot wallet of an exchange; no matter how accurate the clustering, it can't stop someone from changing their routing and having a "split personality." Recently, that mainstream public chain is about to upgrade/maintain, and the group is guessing whether the ecosystem will migrate en masse. I just want to say: you're right to watch the "fund flow," but don't take it as an indicator of intent; on-chain is more like a tavern—people come and go, and anyone could just be passing through. Anyway, I now only treat labels as a reference; if you're really going to bet, it's better to look more closely at contracts and unlocks to avoid getting drunk on your own imagination.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pinned