HalfLifeHodler

These days, the group keeps sharing images about "a certain stablecoin losing its peg" or "lack of transparency in audits." I usually don't forward them; I first check if there are real signs of a run on the chain, so as not to be led by emotions. On the contrary, older issues like cross-chain bridges are more worth paying attention to: multi-signature sounds stable, but the key is "who is signing, and can it be compromised by the same group of people"; the same goes for oracles—if the price feed chain gets messed up, the bridge will follow suit. Many people think I'm too verbose about "waitin

Over the past couple of years, multi-chain wallets have become more and more like drawers—more and more stuff, and you can never find anything... Asset fragmentation itself isn’t scary; what’s scary is that you can’t remember things. My down-to-earth method: group by “purpose,” not by “chain.” For long-term positions, fix everything to one or two addresses that basically never change; for interactions and “hunting yield,” use a separate hot wallet—when you’re done, clear the balance out. Also, keep a dedicated “trash bucket” address just for receiving airdrops—don’t mix it with your main holdi

This round of meme stocks is heating up again, and a bunch of people in the group are talking excitedly. Frankly, I don't oppose participating, but don't treat "narrative" as a shield. My approach is pretty simple: accept the loss if the money is going to lose, leave when the time comes, no adding more, no covering positions. I'd rather miss out than hold stubbornly, anyway there will be new excitement in the next round.
Recently, AI agents and automated trading systems have also been hyped up heavily. It feels like half the people are talking about the future, and the other half are busy inte