In the crypto world here, you can achieve the opportunity for common people to get rich without relying on ability, connections, and background. Welcome to communicate, learn, like, and share, which is the greatest support for me. Thank you for following!

129

Following

Followers

237

Liked

Domingo_gou7 hours ago

Tangent has launched its first CryptoSwap market, supporting collateralized borrowing and lending for C/ETH LP. Compared with simply adding another lending pool, the expansion of the collateral asset boundary is the more noteworthy change.
This is not an ordinary collateral expansion. Previously, the volatile assets in the HEC collateral pool all belonged to the StableSwap system. This marks Tangent’s first inclusion of CryptoSwap non-stable pool LPs within the collateral scope, formally expanding from stable LP assets to non-stable pool assets such as C/ETH, which fluctuate in both directions

ETH+1.51%

Domingo_gou15 hours ago

I just checked @termix_ai's Chain Sentinel and saw two quant orders of 10 USDC each—one marked Settled and the other shown as Revoked.
Seeing Revoked made me wonder: if the order was revoked, does that also mean the AI Agent's permission to operate the wallet was revoked?
After carefully checking, I found that order revocation and wallet permission revocation cannot be directly equated. Revoked is merely the order status displayed on the Jobs page. Although the page includes a Tx transaction link, I was unable to verify the corresponding on-chain authorization or revocation records this time,

USDC+0.01%

Domingo_gou17 hours ago

Earlier, in the OP_CAT Layer explorer, I successfully traced back to my public ClawChat post, “Keep building.”
This time, I specifically tested the scenario, and the difference between the two modes became very clear.
The logic of public socializing—original text searchable on-chain and publicly traceable.
But its core positioning is completely different: it must both preserve trusted records on-chain and protect content privacy without publicly leaking it.
Today I ran a test myself, casually sending 77 sis a “Morning, morning” message on ClawChat.
I clicked the Tx entry beside the message and

BTC+0.84%

Domingo_goua day ago

Mines +225U tonight.
My friend has already started saying it was all thanks to his guidance. Fine, let him brag tonight first 😂 @Roobet

Domingo_gou2 days ago

GM!
I took another look at the @termix_ai Points page and found an easily overlooked detail.
Many people assume that once an order is settled, the points will be safely credited, but there is actually a key rule hidden here.
The official rules clearly state that if the Client and Provider use the same address or belong to the same primary account, the interaction will be deemed sybil activity. Neither party will receive points, and even if the points have already been credited, the platform may claw them back later.
This design is quite interesting.
Settlement and points distribution are essen

1
1.05k

Domingo_gou

Trending Topics

#GateAtTOKEN2049

#LedgerLossesNear90Million

#GateWCTCS9GlobalTradingCompetition

#CRCLLeadsCryptoStocks

#EthereumUpOver71%inQ3

#GateEventMarketVolumeHits73M

#USOpensRussianDieselImports

#GateNetInflowRanks3rd

#SimpleEarnUSDTLimitedTime11%APR

#BTC Pulls Back to 81000