Wu said that the cross-chain liquidity protocol Squid announced the integration of Ripple's stablecoin RLUSD, supporting users to transfer and exchange RLUSD across networks such as XRPL, Ethereum, Base, and Optimism, and to convert assets like USDC, USDT, ETH, XRP into RLUSD through a single transaction. RLUSD is currently natively issued on XRPL and Ethereum, and has been extended to networks such as XRPL EVM Sidechain, Base, Optimism, Ink, and Unichain through Wormhole's NTT standard.

RLUSD0.04%
ETH0.29%
OP1.04%
USDC0.05%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • 2
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
HaiyanColdWallet
· 1h ago
Wait, both Ink and Unichain are listed? RLUSD's expansion speed is more aggressive than I imagined, got the multi-chain strategy figured out.
View OriginalReply0
SweepTheFloor
· 4h ago
Single-transaction exchanges are a bit appealing—swapping USDC directly for RLUSD saves you from having to go through several steps, but I don’t know what the fees are like.
View OriginalReply0
PaperHandsPro
· 4h ago
Ripple's stablecoin has finally left XRPL, Squid's cross-chain routing is indeed convenient, and the one-click RLUSD swap experience is pretty good.
View OriginalReply0
DustyAlpha
· 4h ago
NTT standards are expanding quite quickly; both Base and Optimism can now use RLUSD, and cross-chain bridge competition is getting more intense.
View OriginalReply0
TheReflectionUnderTheNeon
· 4h ago
XRP longtime players are moved to tears—RLUSD’s layout looks like it’s aiming to seize a share of the stablecoin market. Squid has clearly grabbed onto the big leg.
View OriginalReply0
FoldedPrivateKey
· 4h ago
This integration with Squid is solid; RLUSD can finally be used across so many chains. Is XRP ecosystem liquidity about to pick up?
View OriginalReply0