Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
CFD
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
CFD
U.S. stock CFD derivatives
US Stocks
Access real US stocks and ETFs
HK Stocks
Trade quality Hong Kong-listed stocks
Stock Futures
High leverage, 24/7 trading
Tokenized Stocks
Backed by real stock assets
IPO Access
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
GUSD
Mint GUSD for Treasury RWA yields
Stocks Activities
Trade Popular Stocks and Unlock Generous Airdrops
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
IPO Access
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
GateRouter
Smartly choose from 40+ AI models, with 0% extra fees
U.S. Prediction Market Regulatory Jurisdiction Sparks Dispute: Former SEC and CFTC Chairs Support State-Level Oversight
This Thursday, former SEC and CFTC Chair Gary Gensler officially submitted court documents to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit regarding the regulatory jurisdiction of prediction markets.
Gensler believes that businesses related to prediction markets cannot, in the first place, supersede each state’s regulatory rules, directly targeting the increasingly intensifying regulatory disagreements between the federal and local governments in this area.
The statement comes out of a legal dispute between the Kalshi (formerly KalshiEx) platform and the state of Ohio. Kalshi previously brought a lawsuit in an effort to avoid state-level regulation, but the lawsuit was dismissed by a federal judge in March this year.
In his amicus brief filed with the court, Gensler based his analysis on the Dodd-Frank Act and the Commodity Exchange Act, arguing that sports prediction contracts do not fall within CFTC’s federal regulatory scope.
In his view, these contracts essentially fit within the scope of constraints under state laws related to sports betting. Therefore, the federal government does not have the authority to override state regulatory rules, and states should retain primary oversight of sports prediction markets.
Organizations that co-file an amicus brief with Gensler include the Indiana Sports Betting Association and the American Sports Betting Association. These organizations also support state-level regulation, arguing that sports prediction markets are not substantively different from traditional sports betting.
However, the U.S. regulator CFTC has a significantly different position. Current CFTC Chair Mike Selig insists that event contracts are financial derivatives and should fall under the CFTC’s exclusive regulatory authority.
In summary, this jurisdiction battle continues to escalate, and the related case will most likely be appealed to the Supreme Court. The ruling’s outcome will also profoundly shape the compliance direction of the U.S. prediction market industry.
#GaryGensler #Prediction market regulation jurisdiction