Honestly, after reading about this delivery driver in Xi'an, I feel quite complicated.

22 years old, a delivery person, earning not much a month, but with a peculiar fetish—liking bondage.
What girl would cooperate with him? Only by paying.
He negotiated with a woman named Huang for 1,600 yuan, plus an SM session.
What happened after he went to her place? He tied her up, and the act was done.
Would a normal person leave at this point? Not him, his eyes started to dart around.
Seeing a gold ring, a gold necklace, and an Armani watch on the table, greed took over.
While she went to take a shower, he pocketed all the items.
Before leaving, he also stole an iPhone 13.
He might have been proud inside: "Since she’s in this line of work, she definitely won’t dare report to the police."
But what happened? She actually reported it.
Not only that, she also accused him of assault and threats.
The first-instance court accepted this claim and sentenced him for robbery, three years.
He was dissatisfied and appealed.
The second-instance court reviewed the evidence repeatedly and found a problem:
The assault happened during the transaction, to satisfy his fetish, not to steal;
the theft was a spur-of-the-moment act after the fact, taking advantage of her unpreparedness.
This was the key—violence and theft were not directly linked.
In the end, he was convicted of theft, two years.
Interestingly, his family paid Huang 50k yuan, and Huang also wrote a letter of understanding.
But the prison sentence was not reduced.
The 1,600 yuan paid for sex, plus 50k yuan compensation and two years of freedom lost—no matter how you count it, it’s a loss.
The most ironic thing is, he bet on human nature—thinking the other party wouldn’t dare report.
But she “fought to the death,” and he ended up getting caught.
So, who underestimated whom?