Why are "scavenger women" courses so popular?

Yesterday during a live broadcast, someone asked me how I view women who are wholeheartedly pursuing marriage to change their fate. I replied that it’s very normal; everyone has the right to use their resources to improve their lives. Using one’s youth, beauty, and even some disguises or tactics to quickly gain resources and wealth—if you can do it, why not? Those who avoid doing so out of fear of being looked down upon are the fools. They give up a channel to change their destiny because of societal pressure from groups of people who lack these resources, which means they are enabling those people’s wishes.

Does this sound politically incorrect? Yes, but political correctness has always been the tyranny of the majority over the minority, and it’s not necessarily right.

Everyone knows there are many "scavenger women" courses on the market. They mostly use "marriage" and "independent women" as packaging, but what they teach is how to disguise high value at low cost, then through dating or marriage, extract resources or gold from high-resource men. Yes, the difference here is "disguise." High value is faked—pseudonym socialites and the like are all the same type. Men also have corresponding courses, like the popular PUA courses from a few years ago, which aim for the same goal: using various low-cost persona packaging to freeload or extract gold from women.

Why are these courses popular? It shows there is huge demand. Why is there demand? Because they work. The benefits after success are extremely high—this is a clear asymmetry. The exchanged items aren’t worth that much, but they can be exchanged for things that can’t be accumulated through other means. So why is the route through marriage and dating? Because it comes with a "wealth equalization card," allowing for asymmetric transactions through emotional and moral leverage.

And because some people still feel social pressure and hesitate to pursue this fully, there is a significant information gap—do you understand the difference here? Some high-value women, for various reasons, don’t do this, which creates an information advantage for less valuable disguisers to take advantage of.

The logic is this: the more society is unfriendly to these behaviors, the more hesitant people become, and the bigger the information gap and profit margin. If everyone traded stocks straightforwardly—buying and selling with clear orders, buying at one price and selling at another—there would be no chance for "leverage." But now, orders from one to nine are not listed, and the original "buy ten" becomes the "buy one." The trades in between are heavily worn down, and the profit space is huge. That’s why "buy ten" has a strong motivation to participate in these courses—because these behaviors can asymmetrically generate huge returns. It’s no wonder these courses can be sold at sky-high prices.

As the saying goes, when information is opaque and market competition is insufficient, prices are inevitably unfair, and someone will always find a way to get an advantage—this world belongs to those who first liberate their minds and dare to go all out. And what about those who go all out later? They can’t really do it anymore because the window of opportunity is limited. After being morally pressured, in the most valuable trading years, they find a so-called "potential but currently mismatched" partner, thinking it’s a long-term, more secure deal. But later, they realize that most likely, either the potential remains forever unrealized, or the potential is fulfilled but they finally understand that this transaction was never truly guaranteed from the start. Want to trade now? It’s too late. Better not to cut losses at the low point than to do so now, and join the criticism of "scavenger women." Life is your own; only you know what kind of life you’re living. Some are gambling, some are controlling their destiny, some care about others’ opinions, and some focus solely on the best personal strategy. If this world is to be arbitraged, there are too many opportunities—everywhere are asymmetries, rule loopholes, and information gaps. As long as you pay attention and act decisively, these places are much easier than financial markets. #分享美股交易赢英伟达股票