Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Spark: The delisting of rsETH assets in January once triggered strong dissatisfaction among ETH margin trading users, but it has now been proven that the strategy was cautious.
ME News Report, April 19 (UTC+8), Spark Protocol’s strategy lead monetsupply.eth stated on the X platform that in January of this year, they removed low-usage assets such as rsETH and reduced collateral types and functionality, a decision that drew dissatisfaction from “ETH leverage loop” users. At the same time, Spark adopted a high interest rate ceiling strategy in the ETH lending market. Although this approach caused some business and revenue to shift to Aave over the past year, it has proven to be more cautious during the current market crisis. Currently, SparkLend still maintains sufficient ETH withdrawal liquidity, while Aave faces liquidity shortages or even lock-ups across multiple chains. monetsupply.eth warned that since ETH is the core collateral, when market utilization reaches 100%, collateral liquidation becomes impossible, and liquidity exhaustion could pose systemic risks. Especially in cases where Aave’s liquidity is insufficient, a 15%-20% drop in ETH price could lead to significant bad debt accumulation. (Source: MLion)