#USIsraelStrikesIranBTCPlunges Former Mt. Gox CEO Mark Karpeles has proposed a network hard fork to recover approximately 80,000 Bitcoins stolen in 2011 and inactive for 15 years.
Mark Karpeles, the former CEO of Mt. Gox, one of the most prominent targets of one of the largest cyber attacks in crypto history, has come up with a new controversial proposal. Karpeles suggested a hard fork on the Bitcoin network to recover 79,956 BTC that were stolen during a hack attack on Mt. Gox in 2011 and have remained inactive for about 15 years.
“A One-Time Exception” The roughly 80,000 Bitcoins in question have shown no wallet activity since they were leaked from the exchange in 2011. Karpeles’s radical recovery plan requires a retrospective intervention in the Bitcoin network’s code to return the lost funds.
The former CEO acknowledged that this move could be seen as contrary to Bitcoin’s core philosophy, emphasizing that it would not become a general mechanism for reversing transactions or recovering funds. According to Karpeles, this hard fork should be a one-time exception, specific only to this particular situation. It is believed that Karpeles’s proposal will not be taken seriously within the Bitcoin ecosystem. The main reason for this is the principle of immutability in Bitcoin. One of Bitcoin’s greatest value propositions is that transactions on the blockchain are never censored, reversed, or altered. Even a single breach of this rule could undermine Bitcoin’s trust mechanism. Another concern is the risk of network split. If the entire community does not accept this intervention, there is a risk of a chain split, similar to the Bitcoin Cash incident in the past, resulting in two separate networks. INVESTMENT ADVICE NOT RECOMMENDED
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
6 Likes
Reward
6
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MrFlower_XingChen
· 7h ago
To The Moon 🌕
Reply0
LittleQueen
· 9h ago
LFG 🔥
Reply0
LittleQueen
· 9h ago
To The Moon 🌕
Reply0
AYATTAC
· 12h ago
Ape In 🚀
Reply0
AYATTAC
· 12h ago
LFG 🔥
Reply0
AYATTAC
· 12h ago
2026 GOGOGO 👊
Reply0
AYATTAC
· 12h ago
To The Moon 🌕
Reply0
HighAmbition
· 14h ago
thnxx for the update information about crypto
Reply0
CryptoSocietyOfRhinoBrotherIn
· 14h ago
Wishing you great wealth in the Year of the Horse 🐴
#USIsraelStrikesIranBTCPlunges Former Mt. Gox CEO Mark Karpeles has proposed a network hard fork to recover approximately 80,000 Bitcoins stolen in 2011 and inactive for 15 years.
Mark Karpeles, the former CEO of Mt. Gox, one of the most prominent targets of one of the largest cyber attacks in crypto history, has come up with a new controversial proposal. Karpeles suggested a hard fork on the Bitcoin network to recover 79,956 BTC that were stolen during a hack attack on Mt. Gox in 2011 and have remained inactive for about 15 years.
“A One-Time Exception”
The roughly 80,000 Bitcoins in question have shown no wallet activity since they were leaked from the exchange in 2011. Karpeles’s radical recovery plan requires a retrospective intervention in the Bitcoin network’s code to return the lost funds.
The former CEO acknowledged that this move could be seen as contrary to Bitcoin’s core philosophy, emphasizing that it would not become a general mechanism for reversing transactions or recovering funds. According to Karpeles, this hard fork should be a one-time exception, specific only to this particular situation.
It is believed that Karpeles’s proposal will not be taken seriously within the Bitcoin ecosystem. The main reason for this is the principle of immutability in Bitcoin. One of Bitcoin’s greatest value propositions is that transactions on the blockchain are never censored, reversed, or altered. Even a single breach of this rule could undermine Bitcoin’s trust mechanism. Another concern is the risk of network split. If the entire community does not accept this intervention, there is a risk of a chain split, similar to the Bitcoin Cash incident in the past, resulting in two separate networks.
INVESTMENT ADVICE NOT RECOMMENDED
$BTC $ETH $SOL