Can Bitcoin really outperform other assets? Let's take a look at this set of data.

2025-12-30 16:20:10

Abstract generation in progress

【Crypto World】Some investors have recently been pessimistic about Bitcoin again. His logic is very straightforward: Bitcoin is an asset that does not generate cash flow, so it’s useless. Compared to industrial silver mining companies, they can still extract resources, and by 2026, profits are expected to increase significantly. That’s what we call a productive asset.

He even did some calculations. Take MicroStrategy as an example, the company’s average cost for the Bitcoin it holds is about $75,000 each. Looking at it now, over five years, the book profit is only 16%, which translates to an annualized return of about 3%. Honestly, this return rate is hardly impressive compared to other asset classes. Stocks, bonds, real estate—any of these could easily outperform this number over the past five years.

This statement indeed struck a nerve with many coin holders.

BTC0.97%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

TopBuyerForever

· 12m ago

Haha, here we go again with the pessimism. Always the same spiel. Isn't it annoying?

View OriginalReply0

AlgoAlchemist

· 3h ago

Hmm... talking about MSTR with a 3% annualized return over five years, this guy really hasn't understood the market situation, huh? Just want to pass the buck like that?

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-9ad11037