Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
#加密生态动态追踪 Is quantum threat really that scary? Actually, there's no need to panic excessively.
Recently, quantum computing has frequently been portrayed as Bitcoin's "ultimate nemesis." Claims that Shor's algorithm can reverse-engineer private keys from public keys, putting 40 million BTC stored in P2PK addresses at risk, and that Satoshi Nakamoto's million-coin holdings are a ticking time bomb, have been widely circulated. The US government even introduced the "National Quantum Network Security Migration Strategy Act," requiring federal agencies to switch to post-quantum encryption standards by 2035. It all sounds quite alarming.
But upon closer inspection, these concerns are actually exaggerated.
Currently, mainstream Bitcoin wallets have optimized address structures through technologies like Segregated Witness (SegWit), fundamentally eliminating the possibility of directly exposing public keys. This means that even if quantum computing advances significantly, it will be very difficult to reverse-engineer anything from wallet addresses. The risk is not as imminent as it seems.
Looking at industry experts' predictions—there's a huge divergence. Blockstream CEO Adam Back believes it will take at least twenty years, while the UK's National Cyber Security Centre suggests completing the migration by 2035 is sufficient. EY's research indicates that the probability of being cracked within the next 5 to 30 years is only 50%-70%. This provides the industry with ample buffer time to adapt.
More importantly, the entire crypto ecosystem is already advancing its defense systems across multiple dimensions. In Q4 2025, BTQ Technologies demonstrated a quantum-safe Bitcoin solution based on NIST standards using ML-DSA. Leading projects like Ethereum and Cardano are actively integrating quantum-resistant technologies, and proposals like QuBit and QRAMP are directly targeting quantum-resistant signatures.
For ordinary holders, following these key points can help mitigate short-term risks: choose reputable wallets, avoid address reuse, and use multi-signature or cold storage solutions. As industry technology continues to evolve, Bitcoin's defensive infrastructure will only become more robust. Instead of worrying unnecessarily, it's better to hold your position with confidence and wait for the next wave of price increases.
Segregated Witness has been out for a long time, and you're still worried about public key exposure? Wake up
Honestly, I trust Adam Back's twenty-year predictions more; those 2035 forecasts are just government-sentiment considerations
My cold wallet is the most secure; what's the fuss about quantum resistance or not?
The SegWit issue has already been resolved, yet you're still here alarmist and sensational. It's a bit funny.
What was the designated language again? You didn't clarify it.
It's just a big holder holding for twenty years without any issues. Why rush?
Using non-reusable addresses and cold wallets can be handled easily, much more reliable than reading the news every day.
Segregated witness has been out for a long time, and they're still rehashing old news
From 2020 to 2035, are we opening blind boxes here? Even the experts themselves aren’t sure, so why the panic now?
Cold wallets and multi-signature setups have been around for a long time, it’s not a big deal
Instead of worrying about quantum cracking, better to focus on how you manage your private keys
The isolation witness was already sorted out, there's no need to be so anxious about this.
Adam Back said twenty years, I say no rush, anyway my coins are sleeping peacefully in the cold wallet.
---
Honestly, the quantum thing was blown out of proportion by the media. Storing it in a cold wallet is the way to go
---
20 years? 2035? Anyway, I won't live to see that. Just go bankrupt by then
---
As long as you don't reuse Satoshi's old addresses, it should be fine
---
It's better to worry about your private key security than quantum computing. That’s the real threat
---
The key is not to reuse addresses. Why are so many people still reusing them?
---
The industry is working on quantum-resistant solutions. Switching to post-quantum standards now is actually the safest choice
---
It's funny—some people are now stockpiling anti-quantum coins. I think it's just pure hype
---
Multi-signature cold storage is truly unmatched. What is quantum computing anyway?
---
The phrase "HODL with peace of mind" hits home; it's exactly what we should be doing
But I still transferred my coins to a cold wallet. Anyway, I have nothing to do, so having an extra caution doesn't hurt. No matter how advanced the technology is, it can't prevent me from screwing myself over, right? Haha