Michael Saylor Warns Strategy Holders as BIP-110 Threatens Bitcoin Consensus Rules - - #btc #michaelsaylor #mstr

#Bitmine持有578萬枚ETH
ETH fell by 0.78% within a 15-minute window, mainly dragged by dual pressure: broad-based selling sparked by Bitcoin breaking below a key technical level and a strengthening US dollar. Intraday volatility is about 5%. It has now rebounded to $1,922.37, with a 24h drop of 1.39%. The order book is extremely thin—small amounts of capital can trigger significant swings. On the downside, on-chain whales have cashed out 5,000 ETH, sending a capitulation signal from long-term holders; on the upside, Morgan Stanley has launched an ETH exchange-traded product, Arthur Hayes has conti

🔥 Gate Hot Topics｜Event Contract Order Posting & Sharing Starts!
Do you think BTC will go up or down in the next 5 minutes?
During the event, complete any one Gate event contract trade, and share your order screenshot or trading card in the Gate Prediction Market Hot Topics group to enter the daily giveaway.
🎁 Daily draw: 10 users
Each user will receive a 50 USDT BTC contract position experience voucher
How to participate:
1️⃣ Complete an event contract trade
2️⃣ Share your order screenshot or trading card in the group
Gate event contract official first-order loss coverage, profit doubled, a

#CLARITYActEntersFinalCriticalStage
The future of digital assets in the United States may be approaching one of its most defining moments. The CLARITY Act has entered its final critical stage, and the outcome could reshape how cryptocurrencies, blockchain projects, and Web3 businesses operate for years to come.
For years, the crypto industry has struggled with uncertainty. Companies, developers, investors, and institutions have all faced the same question: Which digital assets are securities, and which are commodities? The lack of clear answers has slowed innovation, increased legal risks, an

Claude is now being used to discover weaknesses in real cryptographic implementations, and Anthropic shipped the demo so you can reproduce it.
> the research: Discovering cryptographic weaknesses with Claude
> the proof: Anthropic open-sourced the full demo repo
> the method: aim the model at cryptographic code and let it reason about where the math leaks
> the shift: AI-assisted cryptanalysis stops being a lab anecdote and becomes something you can run yourself

This round of shorting didn't go smoothly at the start. After the price dropped from around 0.0001670, it was quickly pumped back up and topped again. That moment was really frustrating. A lot of people saw the bounce and assumed the trend would reverse, but I didn't get off early. The previous local high was never truly reclaimed, and the bull thesis still hadn't been invalidated.

Later, the market feedback became more and more obvious: after pushing up, it couldn't hold, but during the pullback it kept increasing in volume. Near-term support was clearly not keeping up. That period was the

Honestly, the hardest part of this short isn’t the drop itself—it’s that opening stretch of repeated whipsaw. When selling pressure first showed up, the price didn’t immediately get smashed down. Instead, it poked upward with a few spikes. A lot of people probably got shaken out. I had doubts too, and I kept not daring to relax too much.
After I started watching from 4.25647, once the shorts had taken profit, what I cared about more was whether the rebound would make a new high—not those few red candles in the short term. Later on, every time the price pushed up, it was quickly slammed back do

From Sharp to Snapdragon.
From Umbro to Adidas.
But the badge stays the same 💪
Which era of United kits do you rate more?
Comment "RETRO" or "NEW" below 🔥
#FootballKits #KitCollection #ManchesterUnitedFans #FootballCulture #SoccerLife #CFC

The market isn’t wrong—your emotions are: trading is an amplifier of personality
FOMO (fear of missing out) makes you chase at the highs, while FUD (fear, uncertainty, doubt) makes you cut losses at the lows. Trading isn’t fundamentally a battle against the market—it’s a battle against your own emotions. When emotions take control of decisions, even the most perfect technical analysis will fail.
Real trading experts never rely on on-the-spot performance. They follow the principle of “preparing the trading plan”: before the market opens, they set entry points, stop-loss levels, and take-profit

No exaggeration, no backlash—after the result of this short order came out, I also let out a breath. The truly satisfying part isn’t the change in numbers, but the fact that my judgment and the chart’s timing happened to line up perfectly.
When the price kept driving up and then pulling back, I noticed that the resistance above never really held. A few times the move higher didn’t form any continuation, so I started setting up a short position around 59.837.
Later, the price returned to 55.673. The downside room gradually opened up, and +494.95% can also be seen as a response to this call. Onc

This wave of decline didn’t come out of nowhere—the real signal was actually hidden in the earlier spike and subsequent pullback. The price still looks high, but every time there’s a push up, there’s no staying power. The moment there’s a bit of movement, sell pressure slams it back down. I didn’t rush to chase it at the time—I was mostly waiting for it to reveal its flaws on its own.

When the price returned to around 277.1, the rebound still looked insubstantial, and that’s when I fully committed to the short thesis. There was a quick counter-rally in the middle, and the chart was especiall

7.29 BTC Analysis
Currently, BTC is consolidating near the mid-band. It looks like support, but in fact it’s a mid-band gravity trap, and the lower band 63106 is still left open. The RSI three lines are stuck around 45 at low values; RSI6 is below RSI12, forming a hidden death cross, and short-term momentum is weakening. On the derivatives side, the perpetual swap funding rate is negatively skewed, and right-skewed options indicate a surge in demand for downside hedging; the liquidation heatmap shows dense long positions overhead, so any rebound will trigger strong liquidation sell orders. In

I just wanted to take a quick look at the order book, but this short trade wiped out my sleepiness. A few days ago, in the afternoon, $KAS was whipsawing around the high level. On the surface it looked like it was building up momentum, but in reality every time it pushed toward a key level, it got pushed back down—sell orders were clearly more aggressive each time.
When I watched KAS, I found the rebound wasn’t sustainable and the volume didn’t keep up. The “nobody’s buying on the way up” vibe kept getting stronger. So when the price came to around 0.03380, I followed my plan and went long, w

When the screen is filled with green lights, people are most likely to rush into going all-in with their positions, but what I care about more is whether this pullback left any signs in advance. A few nights ago, the intraday chart kept oscillating; every time $CFX surged, it fell just short of the key level, and when it got close, it was repeatedly knocked back. The follow-through was clearly not keeping up.

So around 0.05811, I chose to execute a long position. Not because I’m afraid of upside, but because the rebound has never had volume—trading volume is low. Once the shorts gain momentu

I only meant to open the order book and take a quick look, but that one glance completely wiped out my drowsiness. While everyone was still watching from the sidelines, $SHIB was already showing signs of fatigue near the highs: the rally was slowing down more and more, the rebounds getting shorter, and the moment the price nears the upper area, sell pressure comes pressing down.
Before the board fully kicked off, I opened a long around 0.000005663. My thinking was very clear at the time: a low-volume push can’t sustain continuation—if there isn’t enough follow-through, don’t force the chase; w

$PI Oh wow, whose short position liquidation was so tragic.

Woke up this morning because risk control kicked in.
I hadn’t been turning on the sound alarm before. I was afraid of trading.
Yesterday I turned the sound on—I guess things haven’t been calm recently.
Took a quick shot at the bottom while I was at it.

$ZIL Don’t touch this! A 32% rise is the trap—whoever chases gets killed.
First, look at the data: $0.0031, up 32% in 24h, but pay attention to the trading volume—it’s only $35 million. With this kind of volume, it can’t really push a sustained rally. What does that indicate? The market maker can’t keep dumping the inventory endlessly; they’re pumping to sell, waiting for the bag-holders. Historically, after every such violent rebound, ZIL has averaged a pullback of 50% or more. Last June, it dropped straight from 0.004 to 0.002—those who chased haven’t even broken even yet. Now retail sentime