💥 Gate Square Event: #PostToWinCGN 💥
Post original content on Gate Square related to CGN, Launchpool, or CandyDrop, and get a chance to share 1,333 CGN rewards!
📅 Event Period: Oct 24, 2025, 10:00 – Nov 4, 2025, 16:00 UTC
📌 Related Campaigns:
Launchpool 👉 https://www.gate.com/announcements/article/47771
CandyDrop 👉 https://www.gate.com/announcements/article/47763
📌 How to Participate:
1️⃣ Post original content related to CGN or one of the above campaigns (Launchpool / CandyDrop).
2️⃣ Content must be at least 80 words.
3️⃣ Add the hashtag #PostToWinCGN
4️⃣ Include a screenshot s
Solana vs Ethereum 2025: Who is the King of Public Chains?
In the rapidly developing world of crypto assets, Solana (SOL) and Ethereum (ETH) have become the most followed showdown. Ethereum was launched in 2015, with a Total Value Locked (TVL) of over $50 billion. Solana was launched in 2020, utilizing a unique Proof of History (PoH) mechanism, processing up to 65,000 transactions per second, while Ethereum only handles 30 TPS.
Solana vs Ethereum 2025 Core Technology Comparison
The first key difference between Solana and Ethereum 2025 lies in the consensus mechanism and throughput. Both use Proof of Stake (PoS), but Ethereum records about 30 transactions per second (TPS), while Solana has an actual 4,000 TPS, theoretically reaching up to 65,000 TPS. This difference significantly affects block generation speed, with Solana's block time being just 400 milliseconds and final confirmation time of 2.5 seconds, whereas Ethereum takes 12 seconds to produce a block, with final confirmation requiring about 15 minutes.
Ethereum aims to improve scalability and reduce energy consumption after transitioning from Proof of Work to PoS in the Ethereum 2.0 upgrade. The network uses a traditional PoS mechanism, where validators participate in network consensus by staking 32 ETH. Ethereum has over 1 million validators, making it super secure and difficult for individuals to exploit. By 2025, this massive network is one of the key reasons banks and large corporations trust Ethereum for things like tokenization of real-world assets.
Solana adopts a unique Proof of History (PoH) mechanism combined with PoS, an innovation that allows the network to timestamp transactions before validating them, significantly increasing processing speed. Solana also has fewer validators, with about 1,500 to 4,500 expected by 2025. Some say this reduces its level of decentralization, which could be a risk. However, the Solana team is working hard to increase the number of validators and distribute power.
Solana supports executing transactions in parallel within a single shard, which is not possible in the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM). Solana transactions can also have multiple signers at the protocol level, allowing for more complex operations without the overhead of smart contracts or the additional infrastructure required on Ethereum.
Transaction Costs and Speed: 20,000 Times the Difference
The differences in costs between Solana and Ethereum in 2025 are astonishing. The transaction fee for Solana is only about $0.00025, which is less than a cent! This low cost comes from its fast system, which avoids congestion. In contrast, by 2025, the average fee for Ethereum is expected to be around $0.05, but it could surge to $5 to $50 during busy network times. If you are making a lot of small transactions, the cost difference will be very significant.
This cost disparity has had a huge impact in practical applications. For applications that require high-frequency trading (such as gaming, payments, and micro-tipping), Solana's low fees make these use cases economically viable, while on Ethereum, these applications often cannot be realized due to excessively high gas fees. For example, in gaming, each item transfer requires a gas fee, and if using Ethereum, a single transfer could cost several dollars, while on Solana it is almost negligible.
Solana utilizes a local fee market, which means that a surge in demand in a part of the network only affects local fees, thus preventing fee increases across the network. In contrast, Ethereum's aggregated architecture uses a shared global fee market, where local demand peaks can affect the global fees for all users. This design difference explains why Ethereum experiences fee spikes during NFT booms or DeFi peaks, while Solana can maintain relatively stable low fees.
Solana vs Ethereum 2025 Cost and Speed Comparison:
Transaction Speed: Solana 65,000 TPS theoretical value (actual 4,000 TPS) vs Ethereum 30 TPS
Block Time: Solana 400 milliseconds vs Ethereum 12 seconds
Final Confirmation: Solana 2.5 seconds vs Ethereum 15 minutes
Average Cost: Solana $0.00025 vs Ethereum $0.05-50
Cost Difference: Up to 200,000 times
Ecosystem and TVL: A Battle of Maturity and Growth
Solana vs Ethereum 2025 presents different advantages in terms of ecosystem. Ethereum has been around longer, giving it a significant lead advantage. As a pioneer of smart contracts, Ethereum has a vast ecosystem with thousands of dApps, excelling particularly in the DeFi and NFT sectors. It is home to numerous dApps, such as Uniswap for trading and OpenSea for NFTs, and there are over a million developers working on it. By 2025, Ethereum still leads in the Total Value Locked of its applications, exceeding $50 billion.
Although Solana is relatively new, it has quickly gained attention due to its speed and low transaction costs, especially in areas such as decentralized exchanges (DEX), gaming, and NFTs. Solana has become a breeding ground for meme coins to thrive. By 2025, Solana's ecosystem is flourishing, with projects like Pump.fun emerging, a platform for creating meme coins, which has seen fees exceed $575 million since March 2024. Solana's trading volume is also substantial—sometimes reaching $12 billion within a week, compared to Ethereum's $24 billion.
From the NFT market perspective, although Ethereum has historically dominated the NFT market in terms of unique buyers and average sale prices, Solana has shown rapid growth in user engagement. In December 2023, Solana's 7-day NFT sales surpassed Ethereum, reaching $102 million, while Ethereum stood at $91 million. Solana's low minting costs and innovations such as compressed NFTs have driven this growth.
Solana tokenized stock trading volume has surpassed 800 million USD, surpassing Ethereum and capturing over 60% of the market share. The network now has over 2,500,000 daily active addresses, far exceeding Ethereum's 747,000. This gap in user activity indicates that Solana is attracting more everyday users and traders.
Major Upgrade in 2025: Firedancer vs Fusaka
Another focus of Solana vs Ethereum 2025 is the upcoming major upgrade. Ethereum developers have finalized the timeline for the Fusaka upgrade, which will take place on the Ethereum mainnet on December 3, 2025. This upgrade focuses on blob scaling, such as the introduction of data availability sampling with PeerDAS, aimed at reducing Layer-2 costs and enhancing overall scalability.
Solana's major upgrade in 2025 is Firedancer. This new system can drive Solana to process 1,000,000 TPS, much faster than any other system. Firedancer makes Solana stronger and more reliable, fixing past issues such as network interruptions. If it works as promised, Solana could leave Ethereum behind in terms of speed and efficiency.
Investment Perspective: Market Capitalization and Growth Potential
For investors, Solana vs Ethereum 2025 offers different risk-reward combinations. As of October 2025, the price of Ethereum (ETH) is $3,981.69, and its market capitalization and widespread adoption make it a core component of many portfolios. Solana (SOL) has a price of $190.10 during the same period, with a significantly greater price increase in recent years, rising 28,000% since 2020, while Ethereum has risen 1,500%.
However, Ethereum's larger market capitalization (over $468.9 billion, compared to Solana's $103.6 billion) makes it a safer choice for some. Institutional investors have significantly contributed to Ethereum's rebound, with $10 billion flowing into US spot ETH ETFs between July and August 2025. Solana's ETF applications (such as VanEck) are still under review, and once approved, they may trigger similar inflows of institutional funds.
Conclusion: The Choice Between Speed and Security
So, which blockchain is better in 2025, Solana vs Ethereum? It depends on what you care about. If you want speed and low fees, Solana is the champion, with 65,000 TPS and a cost of $0.00025 each time, beating Ethereum's 30 TPS and $0.05 cost. The rapid growth of new developers and transaction volume on Solana indicates that it is on fire.
But if you value security and a solid performance record, Ethereum remains king. Its millions of validators and vast ecosystem make it rock solid. Big companies and investors love it, and its upgrades keep it in the game. By 2025, Solana may win over everyday users like gamers or day traders, while Ethereum remains the choice for large projects and institutions.