Crypto KOL Community & Market Trends

Waitlisted for a rig ⏳🛢️
No Saudi yet — but I'm early to whatever the fuck they're drilling at @TheSaudisNFT.

The movie “Niu Lai” has become a hit, and the stock message boards for stocks related to “niu” are buzzing today. Could these stocks all hit their daily limit next Monday? Just thinking about it is hilarious.🤣🤣

The market is closed for the weekend. What are all you genius traders up to?

At $63,000 BTC, are you going to sell at a loss?

First, the surface view: five weeks of sideways trading, and retail investors are nearly losing it.

BTC has traded within the $62,000-$66,000 range for five full weeks. The highs have repeatedly failed to break $65,500, while the lows stubbornly hold above $62,000. Volatility has fallen to multi-year lows, trading volume is sluggish, and even more so on weekends.

The 50-day moving average is pressing down at $63,500, while the 200-day moving average sits far above at $69,000. RSI is neutral-to-weak at 43. A direction is about to be chosen, but no one knows which way.

First: ETFs have stopped buying. This is the biggest problem.

There was a net outflow of $131 million on August 13, followed by another $56 million outflow on the 14th. The inflow momentum at the beginning of the month was abruptly interrupted. The temporary departure of major institutions such as BlackRock and Fidelity is the most direct reason for the lack of upward momentum.

The probability of the Clarity Act passing has fallen sharply on Polymarket, the SEC's crypto conference was canceled, and Cboe's application for a triple-leveraged ETF is a long-term positive but unlikely to have an impact in the short term. With no catalysts during this news vacuum, prices naturally cannot rise.

Second: Volatility has fallen this low only once before, in September 2023.

BTC volatility has fallen to multi-year lows, with 1.79 million BTC changing hands within the $62,000-$66,000 range. What does this data mean?

Those who needed to sell have mostly finished selling

Those who needed to buy have mostly finished buying

The market is waiting for a direction. Whichever way it goes, it will be a violent move.

Third: The fundamental reason it cannot fall further.

The $62,000 level has been tested five times and held five times. The Abu Dhabi sovereign wealth fund is holding, Strategy is holding, and even if BlackRock's ETF is seeing net outflows, its total size remains in the hundreds of millions.

More importantly: short-term holders' cost basis is around $62,000. This means that breaking below $62,000 could trigger large-scale panic selling, but conversely, it also means that—as long as it holds—this is strong support.

The macro environment is neutral-to-bullish: July CPI met expectations, the probability of a rate cut in September is 40%, and rates have most likely peaked. Under a soft-landing outlook, risk assets are headed higher over the medium to long term.

The bulls and bears are facing off. You decide.

On one side:

Five tests of $62,000 held, confirming strong support

Extremely low volatility, with historical patterns pointing to a major move

The rate-cut cycle is approaching, with a liquidity inflection point near

Spot ETFs have accumulated more than $50 billion in inflows, providing a solid foundation

The Fear Index is at 36, with sentiment bottoming

On the other side:

Continuous ETF outflows, with institutional buying absent

Policy tailwinds facing obstacles, with no short-term catalysts

Weekend liquidity drying up, making wicks more likely

A break below $62,000 could trigger cascading liquidations

The 200-day moving average at $69,000 remains far out of reach

Key levels

Resistance above: $63,500 → $64,500-$65,500 → $68,000-$70,000

Support below: $62,000-$62,500 → $60,000-$61,500 → $58,000

Trading strategy

Short-term traders:

Open a small long position in the $62,500-$63,000 range, targeting $63,500-$64,000, with a stop-loss at $62,000. If a rebound to $63,500-$64,000 meets resistance, consider a small short position, targeting $62,500.

Swing traders:

Go long if volume pushes price above $63,500 and the level holds on a retest, targeting $66,000-$68,000. If volume pushes price below $62,500, reduce positions and wait, then reassess around $60,000.

Long-term believers:

Use dollar-cost averaging in batches below $62,000. The rate-cut cycle + post-halving scarcity + continued institutional inflows mean the medium- to long-term logic remains unchanged.

BTC now looks just like September 2023—

Extremely low volatility, five weeks of sideways trading, and everyone thinks “this time is different.”

History never simply repeats itself, but it always rhymes.

If BTC breaks below $62,000, will you sell at a loss or add to your position? #比特币变盘信号出现 #GateCard三重升级 #我的七夕交易分享 $ETH $SOL $BTC

Dear, this week’s U.S. stock gainers list looks truly crazy～
Of course, if you only look at the broader market, it’s actually not particularly dramatic
SPY rose 0.48% this week
Q rose 1.20%
IWM rose 1.52%
The Dow even fell 0.35%
But once you look at the individual stock gainers list, it’s a completely different world
No. 1 XHG surged 291.75% in one week
SCKT rose 203.03%
BANL and XHLD also gained nearly 200%
Even QMCO, ranked No. 8, still rose more than 116% this week
This actually says a lot about one of the market’s current characteristics:
The indexes look calm and uneventful, but the money underneath is extremely active
Especially with IWM outperforming SPY and Q this week, it’s clear that capital isn’t only crowded into large-cap tech stocks, and risk appetite for small-cap stocks has clearly picked up
However, stocks that double in a week—or even nearly triple or quadruple—offer huge opportunities, but the risks are equally high
When looking at the gainers list, you need to research:
Why did these stocks suddenly rise?
Is there a common theme behind them?
Is the money speculating on one-off news, or is a new leading trend forming in a particular direction?
Because what is truly worth understanding, beyond the No. 1 stock on the gainers list
is why this group of stocks began attracting capital’s attention at the same time?

SanDisk CEO: Why did $SNDK rise 34x in a year?
1. The second half of AI is not about training, but inference
After large-model training shifted toward inference, demand for SanDisk changed fundamentally. In particular, scenarios such as KV Cache key-value caching are benefiting flash memory.
As conversations get longer and the number of users increases, HBM and DRAM can no longer hold everything, so some of the data has to be moved to NAND and SSDs.
Context windows are now routinely 128K or even 1M tokens. Combined with long-running tasks performed by AI agents, SanDisk’s position has suddenly become critical.
2. Chips are no longer sold on a quarterly basis!
Previously, customers would come every three months to demand another price cut. Now SanDisk is taking a harder line: Want to secure supply? You must give me long-term orders! This directly smooths out cyclical fluctuations.
3. SanDisk is indispensable hard currency in the AI era
Ever since it fully separated from $WDC and became independent 18 months ago, it has been transforming from a cyclical stock into an AI stock. Wall Street did not understand it before, and the revaluation of its worth is only just beginning!

U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs saw $389.71M in net outflows this week.
That’s the biggest weekly outflow in six weeks.
ETF demand has clearly cooled again, making institutional flows an important signal to watch for $BTC next move.

$BTC keeps getting rejected at intermediate resistance and remains stuck in a range.

The weekly close could set the tone for the next short-term move. Eyes on the breakout or rejection.

#GateLaunchpool141MDOS

SNDK at $1,650—did you miss the move?

Looking only at the surface: from hell to heaven in just two weeks.

After the August 5 earnings report, it was briefly hammered down to 1,350, and in late July it fell to a low of 998—from its ATH of 2,354, nearly halving. But starting August 10, it launched a series of explosive rallies. On August 13, the day of Investor Day, it surged 17.6%, then rose another 7.39% on August 14 to close at 1,641. In two weeks, it went from 1,000 back to 1,650, rebounding more than 60%.

The daily chart has posted consecutive gains on rising volume, while the weekly chart shows a strong bullish engulfing pattern. With RSI near 44 and not yet overbought, there is still room to run. This is not a rebound—it is a trend reversal.

First: Investor Day blew up the narrative. SNDK is no longer a “cyclical stock.”

On August 13, SanDisk held its 2026 Investor Day in New York and unveiled a long-term financial model that stunned the market:

FY2028-2030:

Mid-to-high double-digit revenue growth

Non-GAAP gross margin of approximately 80%

Non-GAAP operating margin of approximately 75%

Adjusted free cash flow margin of approximately 50%

100% of excess cash after investment returned to shareholders

Second: JPMorgan directly called it—there is still 47% upside.

On August 14, JPMorgan upgraded SNDK from “Neutral” to “Overweight,” with a price target of $2,250.

Analyst Harlan Sur said: “SNDK is uniquely positioned in many ways to capture the structural inflection point in NAND demand driven by AI inference.”

He also specifically emphasized the long-term value of the NBM (New Business Model) agreements—“Eight NBM agreements have been signed, with a total contract value of approximately $94.0 billion and an average term of more than four years, structurally resetting SNDK’s margins and significantly reducing cyclicality.”

Third: Eight NBM agreements lock in $93.9 billion in guaranteed revenue.

This is SNDK’s strongest fundamental support. The company has signed long-term NBM supply agreements with eight data center customers, including three U.S. hyperscalers.

Hard data:

Guaranteed total revenue of $93.9 billion

Remaining performance obligations of $91.1 billion

Financial guarantee mechanism of $16.5 billion

Covering more than 50% of capacity in fiscal 2027 and approximately two-thirds of capacity in fiscal 2028

Bulls vs. bears—you decide

On one side:

Investor Day provided long-term guidance of an 80% gross margin and 75% operating margin

JPMorgan upgraded it to Overweight, with a price target of $2,250 (+47%)

Eight NBM agreements lock in $93.9 billion in guaranteed revenue

Q4 revenue +372%, gross margin 84.6%

22 of 25 analysts are bullish

RSI at 44 and not overbought, with further upside potential

On the other side:

The rebound exceeded 60% in two weeks, creating heavy short-term profit-taking pressure

Weekend liquidity is poor, which could amplify perpetual contract volatility

If Monday’s opening falls short of expectations, a sharp pullback could follow

The storage industry has never truly escaped cyclicality

Key levels

Upside resistance: 1,680-1,700 (near the previous high) → 1,800 → 2,000 → 2,250 (JPMorgan’s target)

Downside support: 1,550-1,580 → 1,500 → 1,480

Trading strategy

Short-term traders:

Around 1,650, wait for a pullback to 1,600-1,620 before taking a small long position, with a stop-loss at 1,540-1,550 and targets of 1,720-1,750 → 1,800-1,850.

If it breaks through 1,680-1,700 on strong volume and holds, chase the long, with a target of 1,800.

Swing traders:

Take partial profits on existing long positions around 1,680-1,700, retain a core position, and wait for higher targets. Consider reducing the position only if it breaks below 1,550 on heavy volume.

Long-term believers:

Ignore short-term noise and dollar-cost average based on fundamentals. The bet is on an AI storage supercycle and a restructuring of valuation logic, with a target of 2,250-3,000+

SNDK’s current script—

It is exactly the same as Nvidia in 2023: when the market treated it as a cyclical stock, it was “up too much”; when the market treated it as AI infrastructure, it was “too cheap.”

Once the valuation logic shifts, the ceiling will be redefined.

Is SNDK at 1,650 an opportunity to get on board or a short-term top? #Gate7月增长Top1 #闪迪两周反弹63% #我的七夕交易分享 $SNDK $MU $SKHY

Since getting into crypto, I learned for the first time that a 20% drop is called volatility!
A 50% drop is called a correction!
A 90% drop is called a shakeout!
A 1% rise is called taking off!
So what is a 100% rise called?

Aggressively Buying Google, Dumping Bank of America! Buffett’s 6 Moves in Q2 Have Everyone Scratching Their Heads!

Increased Holdings
1. Google $GOOGL
Shares surged 83% in the second quarter, reaching nearly $38 billion and breaking into Berkshire Hathaway’s top three holdings. Buffett personally backed it, giving investors maximum confidence.
2. Delta Air Lines $DAL
The airline leader that bounced back after the pandemic continued to increase its position by 44% in the second quarter, with a holding value of approximately $5.4 billion. As travel demand recovers, institutions are drawn to its cash flow and the opportunity for a cyclical turnaround.
3. Lennar $LEN
A major U.S. homebuilder, with its position increasing by nearly 30%. Berkshire Hathaway also increased its overall exposure to the housing sector and acquired Taylor Morrison outright, clearly positioning itself for the bottom of the real estate cycle.
4. Macy’s $M
After opening a new position in the first quarter, Berkshire doubled down again in the second quarter. This small position in retail consumer stocks serves as a tentative investment and adds diversity to the portfolio.

Reduced Holdings
5. Constellation Brands $STZ
Completely exited alcoholic beverage consumer products, shifting funds toward areas with higher growth and greater cyclical resilience.
6. Bank of America $BAC
Trimmed approximately 30.2 million shares, moderately cooling its exposure to the financial sector and freeing up room for AI and real-economy cyclical stocks.

Whenever Google dips, I buy it without hesitation!

Tesla Is No Longer Shorted Either! Big Short Michael Burry Suddenly Pulls Out the Nuclear Option: Shorting the Nasdaq Across the Board!

Long Positions
1. Adobe $ADBE
Creative software giant, with AI tools accelerating growth, a deep moat, and stable cash flow. A large position reflects confidence in the certainty of its long-term profitability.
2. MercadoLibre $MELI
Latin American e-commerce and finance provide dual-engine growth. Strong growth and leading market share make it a high-growth, high-quality emerging-market asset.
3. Zoetis $ZTS
Animal health leader with defensive, high-barrier characteristics and solid performance, suitable for defensive positioning.
4. JD.com $JD
Clear advantages from integrating Chinese e-commerce and logistics, low valuation, and aggressive buybacks make it particularly attractive on a risk-reward basis.
5. Lululemon $LULU
Strong sportswear brand with high customer loyalty and continued international expansion.
6. Cash $CASH
Increase the cash allocation to 12%, retaining sufficient firepower to wait for better entry opportunities.

Short Positions or Closed Positions
7. iShares Semiconductor ETF $SOXX
Still the largest short position. The semiconductor sector as a whole shows clear signs of valuation bubbles, but the related put options have been sold to reduce exposure to a single sector.
8. Micron Technology $MU
Increased the short position. AI memory demand has been excessively front-loaded, creating significant risk at current price levels. Institutions are adding to shorts to capture the potential for a pullback.
9. Nvidia $NVDA
Continue to hold short positions, including put options. The AI chip leader’s valuation already fully reflects future growth, creating high bubble risk.
10. Tesla $TSLA
Fully closed the position. The short position was closed for a profit, as the short-term decline had already materialized and it was time to lock in gains.
11. Applied Materials $AMAT
Fully closed the position. The short position was closed for a profit, as the short-term adjustment in equipment stocks had run its course and it was time to take profits.
12. Nasdaq-100 ETF Put Options $QQQ
Approximately 6% of the portfolio. Shift the focus of the short strategy from simply targeting the semiconductor sector to betting on a decline across the entire Nasdaq market, while also increasing the cash allocation to 12% to reduce risk exposure.

Is the chip bubble about to burst?

Escape SaaS! Morgan Stanley’s cards are on the table: It slashed its Arm position, and the money all flowed here:
Increased Holdings
1. NVIDIA $NVDA
The undisputed king of AI chips, with GPUs virtually dominating the global training market. Data center demand is growing explosively, and it is the biggest beneficiary of every AI wave. Institutions continue adding to their positions because they value its unshakable moat and strong visibility.
2. Applied Materials $AMAT
A leader in semiconductor equipment, providing chipmakers with the advanced-process tools they need. Large-scale AI chip expansion cannot happen without it. Order visibility is extremely high, earnings visibility is strong, and its value proposition stands out.
3. Broadcom $AVGO
A dual champion in custom AI chips and high-speed networking, helping major players such as Google and Meta develop specialized ASICs. With rapid growth and high margins, it is the most reliable AI infrastructure player outside of NVIDIA.
4. Cerebras Systems $CBRS
A new dark horse in AI chips that uses an entire wafer to create an ultra-large chip, delivering training speeds far beyond traditional GPUs. Institutions are opening new positions to bet that it can truly take a share of NVIDIA’s pie and capture next-generation computing opportunities.
5. Circle $CRCL
The world’s largest issuer of the USDC stablecoin, with a complete set of regulatory licenses. As institutional capital pours into the crypto market, it serves as the core bridge connecting traditional finance and digital assets, with extremely strong growth visibility.
6. Amazon $AMZN
Its AWS cloud computing business is an important foundation for AI training and inference. Continued expansion of its in-house chips and massive data center network gives institutions reason to make modest additions, as they seek to capture its long-term AI infrastructure upside.
Decreased Holdings
7. Arm $ARM
The leader in smartphone and edge AI architectures, earning easy money through its licensing model. However, its current valuation is already very high, and its growth upside is relatively limited. Institutions chose to slash their positions and lock in gains, redirecting capital toward computing hardware with greater explosive potential.
8. Snowflake $SNOW
A leader in cloud data warehousing, with strong interest in the AI data analytics theme. However, its valuation bubble is evident and growth is slowing, so institutions substantially reduced their positions to avoid risk at elevated levels.
9. Salesforce $CRM
An enterprise software giant benefiting from the AI agent theme. However, competition is intensifying and growth has fallen short of expectations. Institutions chose to reduce their positions and lock in profits, shifting toward more hard-core hardware names.
10. Palo Alto Networks $PANW
A leader in cybersecurity. Although demand for AI security is rising, its valuation already fully reflects expectations, so institutions made modest reductions to rebalance their positions.
The strategy is clear: abandon software and invest in hardware!

Major Signal! The Tiger Fund Suddenly Slashed Its Positions in Google and Nvidia, Completely Changing the Market Direction for the Second Half of the Year!

Reduced Positions

1. Broadcom $AVGO
The Tiger Fund significantly reduced its position, mainly taking profits after the stock’s sharp gains earlier and redirecting capital toward new opportunities in the AI supply chain.
2. Google $GOOGL
The Tiger Fund significantly reduced its position by $1.72 billion, the largest single-stock reduction of the quarter. This reflects a systematic portfolio rebalancing and profit-taking move involving high-valued technology giants, while shifting capital from market leaders to emerging growth sectors.
3. TSMC $TSM
A routine move to optimize the portfolio structure and reduce concentration in core positions.
4. Microsoft $MSFT
A slight reduction, mainly to control the proportion of large-cap technology holdings and free up capital for new areas.
5. Meta $META
The Tiger Fund reduced part of its position to lower its concentration in the social advertising sector and diversify the portfolio.
6. Nvidia $NVDA
A slight reduction, driven more by profit-taking at elevated levels and risk control than by a bearish view of its long-term fundamentals.
7. JD.com $JD
Overall exposure to Chinese consumer stocks was reduced, with a focus on higher-certainty core U.S. assets.
8. Netflix $NFLX
A complete exit from the streaming sector in favor of new targets with greater growth potential.

Increased Positions

1. Advanced Micro Devices $AMD
Nvidia’s strongest challenger, with its data-center Instinct GPUs rapidly gaining traction and offering strong cost performance. The Tiger Fund established a new position to diversify its AI computing bets and capture a second growth curve beyond Nvidia.
2. SpaceX $SPCX
Driven by the dual engines of commercial aerospace and Starlink satellite internet, with rocket reusability significantly reducing costs and global coverage continuing to expand. The Tiger Fund established a new position, attracted by its scarce long-term growth potential in aerospace technology and the commercial rollout potential of Starlink.
3. Intel $INTC
Advancing on both foundry services and AI chips, with new process nodes gradually delivering results, policy support strengthening, and customers returning. The Tiger Fund significantly increased its position, believing Intel has low valuation and strong cost performance, with the potential to benefit from semiconductor localization and a recovery in the foundry business.

Clearly, this is a typical strategy of selling market leaders and buying challengers to position for new sectors!

I’ve checked out many AI‑Agent projects lately. Most focus heavily on model performance, yet few solve the real‑world coordination problem between different participants. That’s why the newly‑launched AxiomOS caught my eye. AxiomOS is a coordination system built for AI Agents,

Pump.fun team and investor tokens underwent a monthly unlock 5 hours ago: 4.94 billion solana:pumpCmXqMfrsAkQ5r49WcJnRayYRqmXz6ae8H7H9Dfn ($13.6 million) were unlocked, transferred out, and distributed to 125 wallets.

September rate hike probability falls below 40%: Has BTC’s liquidity inflection point arrived?

Last night, the U.S. Department of Commerce released data: July retail sales fell 0.6% month-on-month, while the market had expected a 0.1% increase.

June still saw positive growth of 0.2%, but that completely reversed within a month.

Consumption accounts for 70% of U.S. GDP. Once this collapses, the entire economic narrative has to be rewritten.

On the same day, the University of Michigan’s preliminary August Consumer Sentiment Index came in at 51.0, versus expectations of 54.5, while July stood at 55.2. It declined for the first time in three months, falling 7.6% month-on-month.

Americans not only have less money to spend; they have also lost confidence that they will have money to spend in the future.

Let’s lay out the cards from the past week:

July CPI rose 3.4% year-on-year, below the previous reading of 3.5%, while core CPI fell to 2.5% year-on-year. Inflation is cooling.

July PPI was flat month-on-month at 0%, while expectations were for a 0.2% increase. Producer prices are lying flat.

July nonfarm payrolls fell by 23k, while expectations were for an increase of 80k. The May and June figures were also revised down by a cumulative 103k.

Four arrows fired at once: cooling CPI + flat PPI + collapsing nonfarm payrolls + plunging retail sales.

Consumption has stalled, employment has collapsed, and prices can no longer rise—what reason does the Federal Reserve have to keep raising rates?

On August 5, CME FedWatch showed a 58.4% probability of a September rate hike.

On August 7, after the nonfarm payrolls report came out, it fell to 55%.

On August 12, after the CPI report came out, it fell to 48%.

On August 13, after the PPI report came out, it fell to 38%.

In one week, the rate hike probability fell from 58% to 38%, dropping to 65% of its original level. The probability of rates remaining unchanged has already risen to 59.9%.

One data point after another has dismantled the hawkish stronghold brick by brick.

On August 14, BTC fell back to $62,773. It is still hovering around $60k.

QCP Capital put it bluntly: geopolitical risks, elevated oil prices, and uncertainty over global liquidity—these macro headwinds have outweighed all the favorable economic data.

In other words: it failed to rise when it was supposed to.

The rate-hike shoe is about to be pulled back, and the liquidity inflection point is coming—but BTC simply is not taking off.

The rate hike probability has fallen from 58% to 38%, yet BTC is still hovering around $60k.

Either the market is wrong, or something bigger is brewing.

I personally lean toward the latter.

Three consecutive months of major inflation data have failed to move BTC. This asset, which should have been trading on rate-cut expectations, is now being driven entirely by other factors—the U.S.-Iran conflict, oil prices above $100, and institutional selling.

Macroeconomic tailwinds have been completely offset by geopolitical headwinds.

Oil prices cannot stay at $100 forever, and the Middle East cannot remain at war forever, but the Federal Reserve makes an interest-rate decision every month.

When these short-term sources of noise fade, the long-term trend of easier liquidity will arrive late, but it will not be absent.

Let me end with something practical—

Now is not the time to panic; it is time to keep your eyes wide open.

The rate hike probability has fallen below 40%, and the market is repricing. If there is no rate hike in September, or even if rate cuts begin to be discussed—BTC’s current price is a golden pit.

But if you have no cash, it makes no difference how deep the pit is. #Gate7月增长Top1 #闪迪两周反弹63% #我的七夕交易分享 $BTC $ETH $AKE

Everyone wants to know whether $ETH has already bottomed.

I think the better question is:

What does ETH need to prove before the next major move?

Look at the weekly chart.

A descending trendline has been controlling price for a long time. ETH keeps getting rejected, falls back down, then builds another base.

But this time, ETH is approaching that trendline again.

If ETH breaks the trendline and gets a weekly close above it, the structure could change completely.

That would be the first real signal that the long-term downtrend is losing control.

A confirmed breakout could open the door toward the $4.8K–$5K area.

Until then, I’m watching the breakout rather than predicting it.

Trade the confirmation, not the hope

$GPS ‌ — 1H Setup 📉

Bias: Bearish

Entry: $0.01025–$0.01045

SL: $0.01112

TP1: $0.00990

TP2: $0.00975

TP3: $0.00946

Analysis:
GPS had a sharp rejection from $0.01199 and flipped below the 1H Supertrend at $0.01109. Since then, price has been consolidating around $0.0100–$0.0102, suggesting sellers still have the upper hand.

I’d prefer a bounce into $0.01025–$0.01045 followed by rejection rather than chasing at the current price. A clean break below $0.00989 could open the way toward $0.00975 and eventually $0.00946.

Invalidation: A strong 1H reclaim above $0.01109–$0.01112 would invalidate the bearish setup.

Chart-based setup, not financial advice.

#StockTradingShareChallenge #GateJulyTransparencyReportReleased

$SPCX Market Update

SpaceX pre-market token/derivative standard (SPCXUSDT) is currently experiencing short-term volatility, trading at $139.87 (-2.33%).

24h Range: $135.56 – $144.95
24h Volume: 1.34M SPCX ($187.75M USDT)

Key Levels: Price bounced strongly off local support at $135.56, attempting to reclaim $140+ after rejection from recent highs near $148.47.

Upcoming Catalyst: Keep an eye out as earnings data is scheduled for release on 2026-09-02.

Are you buying the dip or waiting for a breakout above $145? #GateLaunchpool141MDOS #SandiskSurges14%OnNewFinancialFramework #TetherReservesExceedLiabilitiesBy6.8B