Square
Following
Hot
News
Notifications
Profile
Share your thoughts
placeholder
Article
Is the question "Are there funds in the vault?" still sufficient?

While the question of whether there are enough funds in the vault has been asked of cryptocurrency exchanges for years, the true critical point lies elsewhere: are those funds held in a wallet vulnerable to online attacks, or in a physically isolated vault?

A series of security breaches and losses amounting to millions of dollars across the industry has painfully demonstrated that the concept of "Proof of Reserves" is not enough on its own. This is because Proof of Reserves merely verifies the balance between the ledger and th
Dr.Han
Recently, a series of thefts have occurred across the industry. Every security incident affects not just one company, but everyone’s trust in the crypto industry.

It also reminds me of why we started working on Proof of Reserves (PoR) in 2020. The idea was simple: if users entrust their assets to an exchange for safekeeping, they have the right to know whether those assets are fully backed. Trust isn’t about believing promises; it requires verifiable evidence.

Over time, PoR was adopted by more and more exchanges and became a very important part of the industry’s security framework.

When change happens, it can look like just an experiment. Only in hindsight do we realize that it has gradually become an industry consensus.

Over the past few years, we have consistently made platform security and user funds our top priorities, continually optimizing and improving our exchange security measures. But these recent incidents have made me realize that Proof of Reserves alone is not enough for an exchange.

PoR can tell users whether an exchange has sufficient asset reserves, but it doesn’t answer another equally important question: how exactly are those assets stored? No exchange can promise that it faces no risk of theft, but how much of its assets are in cold wallets and how much in hot wallets? In the worst-case scenario, would the assets in cold storage still be enough to cover user assets? This information can be disclosed to users transparently; the industry just doesn’t yet have a public, unified measurement standard.

So today, Gate launched Proof of Security (PoSEC). With PoSEC, users no longer have to simply take an exchange’s word that “assets are safe.” They can directly view the cold storage coverage ratio, calculation methodology, and asset storage structure, with the relevant data verified through a third-party audit.

PoSEC introduces a straightforward metric: the cold storage coverage ratio. As long as this figure is at least 100%, it means that even if the assets in an exchange’s hot wallets were wiped out, the assets in cold storage would still be sufficient to cover all user assets.

Gate’s latest PoSEC cold storage coverage ratio is 104.58%.

Here, cold storage includes not only on-chain crypto assets, but also traditional off-chain assets involved in the platform’s business. For on-chain digital assets counted as cold storage, private keys are kept offline, asset transfers require multiple signatures, and transaction details are independently verified before signing. Traditional assets such as stocks and U.S. Treasuries are held by independent custodians and transferred and managed according to established authorization procedures. We are working with an independent third-party audit firm, and the report will be published on our official website once the audit is complete. We will also share more details over time.

Cold storage is important because keeping private keys offline can greatly reduce the risk of on-chain assets being exposed to online attacks. The higher the cold storage coverage ratio, the greater the safety buffer for user assets in extreme situations. This is increasingly drawing attention from regulators. Recently, South Korean regulators have also been discussing raising the required proportion of exchange assets held in cold wallets.

When Proof of Reserves went live in 2020, I had no idea how far it would go.

This time, we also hope PoSEC will become more than just a security measure at Gate and can become an industry consensus. If more platforms are willing to disclose their hot and cold wallet structures and let users verify how their assets are protected, users will have a genuine standard for comparison, and the industry’s overall security threshold will rise.

True trust should be built on public, transparent, and verifiable data.

PoSEC’s calculation methodology and cold storage standards are now public. We welcome our peers to refer to them, and all users to scrutinize them.

gate.com/proof-of-security

Don’t trust, verify.
BTC-0.67%
GT-2.41%
ETH-1.26%
SOL-0.77%
XRP-1.15%
  • 4
  • 3
I like their eyeliner. Tell me how they draw it @grok.
Trenches
ZIG
Z
bade
b
ZIG
0x8c...1145
Market Cap
$.
Change
.
24h Vol
$.
Holders
.
BTC
B
bade
b
BTC
C5xp...pump
Market Cap
$.
Change
.
24h Vol
$.
Holders
.
scamsem
s
bade
b
scamsem
41Wp...pump
Market Cap
$.
Change
.
24h Vol
$.
Holders
.
IDOL
I
bade
b
IDOL
0x3b...ab07
Market Cap
$.
Change
.
24h Vol
$.
Holders
.
DOGE
D
bade
b
DOGE
DoGE...fm7R
Market Cap
$.
Change
.
24h Vol
$.
Holders
.
Had a fantastic winning streak in November
But it ends today💔
post-image
#GoldmanSachsRemainsBullishOnDataCentersDespiteTheAISelloff
Goldman Sachs Remains Bullish on Data Centers Despite the AI Selloff
Despite the recent selloff in artificial intelligence (AI) stocks, Goldman Sachs remains optimistic about the long-term future of data centers. This positive outlook highlights the growing importance of digital infrastructure as businesses, technology companies, and cloud service providers continue investing heavily in AI development.
The recent AI market correction has raised concerns among investors about high valuations, excessive spending, and whether AI-related
GS-0.30%
  • 1
$BTC : a week under close watch.
Tuesday, November 10, the U.S. CPI will be in the spotlight.
→ Expected monthly inflation: +0.3%
→ Excluding food and energy: +0.2%
→ BTC: $76,038 on Friday, down 1.6% for the week.
post-image
GitHub unveiled the Rubicon architecture, saying a single repository can support 5,000 concurrent AI agents and 7,200 pushes per second—far beyond the peak of dozens of pushes per second seen in today’s busiest repositories. The architecture has entered a limited private beta.

Repositories are like country roads right now, and GitHub has already built a highway that can handle 5,000 trucks. The funny part is that every push triggers CI, deployments, and other agents reading the code, so the more frequently you write, the more read traffic gets amplified. The faster you write, the more you rea
BTC-0.67%
From the evening of November 6 through November 7, Chinese-speaking users widely reported that a batch of @ChatGPT accounts had suddenly been deactivated. Multiple users said they were greeted with “Your account has been deleted or deactivated” or “No account found” when logging in, and had received no deactivation notice by email. Frequently mentioned circumstances included third-party top-ups, shared accounts, subscriptions from low-cost regions, and accessing the service from mainland China via VPN.
Community screenshots showed affected accounts on high-priced tiers such as Philippines-regi
Injective CEO Eric Chen and Canary Capital CEO Steven McClurg rang Nasdaq's opening bell on November 6 for INJC, the first US staked INJ ETF.
Injective:
"What started in a dorm room in 2018 is now at the center of Wall Street."
@injective @ericinjective
INJ-1.67%
NDAQ+0.28%
MARKET PREDICTION DOGE
live-cover
LIVE2,005
New stimer
live-cover
LIVE1,154
GPT hasn't seen much of the world
post-image
#AI科技股大跌加密市场承压 #WCTCS9 #BTC行情分析 Bitcoin fell to $74,888, an 11-week low: Why 67% of traders are still long is the real problem

At 8 a.m. today, Bitcoin hit a low of $74,888. That was its lowest level since August, a new 11-week low.
But at the same time, if you look at the price change, you’ll find a puzzling number: it was down just 0.3% over the past 24 hours. It hit a new low, but didn’t fall much further. That contrast is the most noteworthy thing today.

1. First, let’s look at the numbers across three time frames
Looking at just one day can be misleading; we need to consider three time
post-image
BTC-0.65%
That's why I work
Theses simple moments
No rolex, no cars. Peace and Freedom
post-image
When bitcoin hits $120K in the next 12 months.
you’ll wish you had bought more today at $75K.
post-image
Someone has now come forward to explain the Thai UID conflict firsthand.

Two programs, two different architectures.

But they still conflicted.

We won’t discuss this topic anymore.
post-image
“The Three Things I Regret Most After Years of Trading”
The things unrelated to money are what I regret most.
First: I gave three years of my life entirely to candlestick charts
During those three years, I learned nothing new, got no promotion, built no network, and never spent a full holiday with my family.
I thought I was “investing in myself,” but really, I was just waiting for an uncertain outcome.
You can earn back money you lose, but you can’t get those three years back.
Once, when my mom was hospitalized, I was watching the market outside her room. I only heard the nurse after she calle
post-image
BTC-0.65%
This frog is showing strength when the market isn't exactly making life easy

$PEPE /BTC keeps grinding higher

Now imagine the market actually turning supportive

Some people are going to remember PEPE exists only after it starts printing ridiculous candles
post-image
PEPE+0.97%
  • 2
#ETH #BTC #BAN #PHA #PNUT
Folks, I’m your spiritual pillar. Latest alert: there’ll be a massive plunge tonight. Remember what I said: short right now. Don’t go long. Only short from the highs. Making money in crypto is simple; information is crucial. Follow along and take profits. Remember what I said?
Are these tariffs really moving trillions of dollars into the U.S.? Navarro makes it sound like it’s actually happening, but I’ve been watching trade flows for a while, and something just doesn’t add up. Anyway, I learned my lesson with stop-losses: I set them too tight and got stopped out twice, so now I keep them way farther away. Hope I’m wrong this time—if I am, that means the market still has room to run.
#Tariffs
If you’re keeping an eye on this, give me a follow.
post-image
“Stop Asking Me for Entry Levels”
The three most common words in my DMs every day: Can I get in?
The second most common: What level do you see?
Today, I’m going to make this clear:
You’re not asking for an entry level; you’re asking for an answer that lets you avoid taking responsibility.
If I give you an entry level and you profit, you’ll think you executed well;
if you lose, you’ll say I gave you a garbage trade.
From beginning to end, you’ve never taken responsibility for your own money. People like that will lose even after trading for ten years.
What’s even more brutal—
Entry levels are t
post-image
BTC-0.65%
Load More

Join 40 M users in our growing community

⚡️ Join 40 M users in the crypto craze discussion

💬 Engage with your favorite top creators

👍 See what interests you

Trending Topics

USAIStocksHitHard

20.03k Views3.67k Discussing

U.S. stocks sold off sharply on Thursday, November 5 (UTC). The Nasdaq closed down around 5.5%, entering correction territory, while the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index plunged roughly 12%, with chip stocks including $NVDA and $AMD posting steep losses. Beyond profit-taking, investors are growing concerned about the pace of AI data center construction, capital spending, and future returns on investment. The key question now is whether the AI sector’s lofty growth expectations need to be repriced. Where do you think the next opportunities will emerge: chip stocks, tech giants, or other sectors?

USNonfarmPayrolls

31.86k Views4.33k Discussing

StakeOnLaunchpoolToShare450KVLX

8.28k Views816 Discussing

View More