$BTW What the hell, is this coin all about funding rates?😡😡

On day one, the account reached 1047u. The market is choppy with a downward trend, so focus mainly on shorting into strength; if a sharp wick occurs, you can reverse and take a small long position to catch the rebound

#BTCDropsBelow81000
It was scary it touched $80500 point and now over $81130 dollar , Hopefully Bitcoin no fall anymore but very scary, it can fall So big like waterfall !

$CRCLB being oversold does not mean it has bottomed; wait for the structure to signal that the decline has stopped
$CRCLB is now trading at 85.39 USDT, with a 24-hour change of -1.08%, a 24-hour high of 88.42, and a low of 84.54. In this snapshot, 84.54 is the 1-hour support and 88.42 is the 1-hour resistance. The 1-hour trend is weak, the 4-hour trend is also weak, and trading participation is 0.12x. Both the decline and the low are there, but I wouldn't automatically interpret this combination as a bottom. The numbers themselves don't constitute a view; it's their combination that merits fu

I just locked in a 6.375% mortgage the other day. About to be a homeowner.

$SPACEHOOD is going to die?

Yesterday officially ushered in Frost's Descent, Mercury goes retrograde today, options expire tomorrow, there's a full moon the day after, and FOMC the day after that, along with a bunch of earnings reports from US and A-share companies.
The coming week is really going to be exciting, with multiple variables all converging.
#BTC #ETH #Q #SPX

BTC’s drop last night was something quant traders should have recognized
U.S. stocks all closed lower last night, with the Dow down 1.23% and the Nasdaq down 0.21%. Oil prices surged, and price pressures in the U.S. PMI rose again, so risk assets naturally took a hit. But I’m more focused on BTC’s own price action. On the 30-minute chart, price oscillated repeatedly between 81,200 and 81,900, with each high getting lower. Then 81,200 failed to hold, and the price headed straight toward 80,500. That was the most noteworthy part of last night. When trading futures manually, many people see a dro

TVL up nearly 19% in a week, $BNB up 2% against the trend: I'm bullish
Man, the whole market has 26 gainers and 43 losers. $BNB is bucking the trend, up 2.065%, currently at 748.27. PancakeSwap TVL topped $2.4 billion two hours ago. A rally this strong in a defensive market is backed by real money, so I'm bullish—with a stop-loss.

This isn't just hype. TVL is up nearly 19% in a week, and V3 pools have reached $739 million. The Flip proposes raising the LP fee share to 88% and cutting CAKE daily emissions from 22500 to 7000. BNB Chain is attracting the capital, and BNB is being burned.

The

$XRP fell to 1.2885 USDT, down 1.49% over 24 hours, with the high and low also very close together.
1-hour support is at 1.2817, and 1-hour resistance is at 1.3307. Both the 1-hour and 4-hour trends are weak, with trading participation at 0.40x.
It has fallen quite a bit, so oversold conditions will naturally be cited as a reason for a rebound. But the price now looks more like it is waiting for confirmation: has selling pressure been exhausted? Volume has not picked up, which means this rebound has not yet formed a structure. Strong buying support is also nowhere to be seen.
I’m more inclined

Based on the chart I’ve shared, the price of BTC remains trapped within a demand zone. According to the pattern, the price should begin a bullish move from this area; however, the market often has its own agenda. So, even though I am 100% confident in a bullish outlook for BTC, there is still a significant possibility of market manipulation, as the price has yet to show any strong momentum to push upward. $BTC ‌

$BMT Today's funding picture is bearish but has entered an extreme zone. Bottom line: short-term selling momentum is fading, favoring buying the dip, but only for a rebound—not a reversal. The 24h plunge of 16.07% came on just 13.3M USDT in trading volume, indicating a low-volume sell-off, with a large amount of bullish leverage already flushed out; the Fear & Greed Index at 51 is neutral, suggesting this is not broad-based panic but a wick-driven move triggered by localized liquidations. In this structure, chasing shorts offers poor risk-reward and could instead lead to a rapid short-coverin

My first slab added to the collection is called gambler.
Fitting.
Everything in life is a gamble.

Last night, I set a rule for myself: don't touch it yet. I ended up watching until 3:30
and still didn't touch it. This time, I behaved.
$SOL It ground down from 107.40 at 09:00 on 10-22 →
Today at 06:00, it plunged to 101.67 →
Now at 102.62, up 0.9%.
Down 5.3% over 45 hours, averaging 0.12% per hour.
This doesn't look like a sell-off; it looks like someone spooning it out.
The bears didn't get their panic, and the bulls didn't catch the blood.
The 20-hour moving average at 104.07 is overhead; every bounce runs into it.
Funding rate: -0.0069%; shorts still have to pay overnight fees (not a jo

Why might the recipient still not receive the funds even though the transaction shows as successful?
In the Web3 world, a transfer showing as successful does not necessarily mean the recipient has received and can use the assets.
The problem may occur at different stages:
1️⃣ Blockchain confirmation and deposit status are different
A transaction being confirmed on the blockchain only means it has been included in a block and has met the relevant confirmation requirements. An exchange or other platform may require additional confirmations before crediting the assets to the user's account.
2️⃣ T

Musk hit the nail on the head. The money sent to Ukraine makes its way back as campaign funding, so it’s obvious who least wants a ceasefire. Taxpayers are paying to fund their own opposition—that’s a losing deal no matter how you look at it. What have you observed on your end? From where I stand, the longer the war drags on, the more it looks like a business.

I’m not calling a direction—just laying out the objective numbers from this Starknet vote. Voting opened on October 15 and closed on October 22, after 7 days. The three options were support further research / oppose / neutral. Around 3,200 votes were cast in total, with 93.52% of voting power choosing support. But this was a non-binding vote; yes doesn’t mean an immediate move to L1—StarkWare must first put forward a technical proposal, followed by another formal governance vote. The backdrop is that StarkWare CEO Eli Ben-Sasson publicly discussed how the threat from quantum computing may be c

Franklin Templeton leads traditional finance with $2.56 billion in tokenized assets, closely followed by BlackRock at $2.2 billion. Distribution remains top-heavy, with only six of the leading institutions surpassing $500 million in tokenized assets and only 11 surpassing $100 million👀
‍#CryptoObservers