Square
Following
Hot
News
Profile
Share your thoughts
placeholder
Article
US FOMO meeting... How to view the trend
live-cover
LIVE1,100
The entry at 4080 was pretty good
Trenches
TTWO
T
bade
b
TTWO
TTWo...FbKo
Market Cap
$.
Change
.
24h Vol
$.
Holders
.
BNCB
B
bade
b
BNCB
0x49...ec3f
Market Cap
$.
Change
.
24h Vol
$.
Holders
.
STONK
S
bade
b
STONK
6GmA...UNgx
Market Cap
$.
Change
.
24h Vol
$.
Holders
.
DJT
D
bade
b
DJT
DJTu...xvoF
Market Cap
$.
Change
.
24h Vol
$.
Holders
.
ZIG
Z
bade
b
ZIG
0x8c...1145
Market Cap
$.
Change
.
24h Vol
$.
Holders
.
$MRVL is in advanced talks to acquire $LITE
post-image
MRVL+3.32%
LITE+5.45%
this is the 3rd largest company in the world btw
post-image
"it's so over" as Bitcoin goes from $82k → $80k,
and then "we're so back" from $80k → $82k.
absolute lunatics.
same people that naively think they would've killed it in previous cycles, not realizing the agonizing chop we had to endure majority of the time - currently losing their minds because the market ranged for a month.
never succumb to this kind of behavior if you want to do well in markets; when the move that matters actually happens, you'll be stripped of the confidence required in order to trade it appropriately
so instead of trying to draw assumptions from insignificant price action,
post-image
BTC-0.67%
Why can an order book look deep, yet liquidity suddenly disappear when you actually place an order?
In crypto markets, you may sometimes see large buy orders stacked in the order book and assume there is strong support below. But when prices start falling rapidly, those buy orders can quickly disappear, and a market that seemed stable can suddenly become fragile.
Why does this happen?
First, limit orders can be canceled at any time.
The order book shows currently visible limit orders, not completed trades. Traders can modify or cancel orders as market conditions change. So large orders only in
post-image
  • 1
🎯 WHICH GOAL ARE YOU SHOOTING AT FIRST? 👀🔥
💰 $10K portfolio
💎 $100K portfolio
🚀 $1M portfolio
🏆 Financial freedom
Everybody has a target. The real question is, WHAT'S YOUR FIRST BIG WIN? 👇
Drop your goal in the comments! Let's see who's aiming for the stars. 🌟💸
#Crypto #Memecoins #100x
post-image
Mid night trends
live-cover
LIVE1,397
FXRP, Flare's wrapped XRP, had 20M tokens working in DeFi on other networks by October, five times the 4M on July 9.
It reaches Ethereum, Base, BNB Chain, Monad, Katana and Hyperliquid, where it became the first XRP spot pair.
@FlareNetworks
XRP-1.15%
ETH-1.26%
BNB-0.76%
MON+2.58%
KAT+2.60%
Why Can a Trading Strategy with a High Win Rate Still Lose Money in the End?
In cryptocurrency trading, many people focus heavily on the win rate. Winning eight out of ten trades looks quite impressive. But if the account still ends up in the red, the problem may not be the win rate, but the amount won and lost on each trade.
Suppose a trader makes 10 trades, winning 8 of them and earning 10 USDT per win; the other 2 trades lose 50 USDT each.
The 8 wins bring in 80 USDT, while the 2 losses result in a loss of 100 USDT. Without considering fees and funding rates, the final result is still a los
post-image
The higher the reward-to-risk ratio, the lower the win rate required.
《The Art of Trading》 includes a table calculating the win rate needed to break even. Put simply:
Make 1, lose 1: you need to win half the time;
Make 3, lose 1: a 25% win rate breaks even;
Make 10, lose 1: a win rate of around 9% breaks even;
Conversely, lose 3 to make 1: you need to win 75% of the time just to break even.
That’s why the book sets a threshold for planned trades: “The initial reward-to-risk ratio must be at least 3:1 to plan a trade” (《The Art of Trading》, p. 9). In context, this means making 3 and losing 1.
W
post-image
Hong Kong-regulated gold just landed on Sui.
Backed 1:1 by physical bullion, with compliance built into every trade.
$SUI is making a serious play for institutional money.
Gold is going on-chain. Who needs the middlemen?
post-image
SUI-1.05%
Google data shows that search queries in AI Mode are three times longer on average than traditional searches, but users’ acceptance of and click-through rates on ads are comparable to those in traditional search.
Users now have to type three times as much and look at more ads. People sure are getting more patient in the AI era.
AI-assisted content creation
$BTC
post-image
BTC-0.67%
$COTI MASSIVE SEND INCOMING
post-image
COTI-2.75%
$SKHYB Moving averages are bullish, but MACD has turned bearish—can the pullback be bought?
From a technical perspective, $SKHYB is currently at 159.35. MA5=161.128 remains above MA20=159.68, keeping the short- and medium-term moving averages in a bullish alignment, but the price has fallen below MA5, representing a normal pullback after a strong move. The MACD histogram is at -0.6107, indicating bearish momentum and a short-term weakening in upward momentum. RSI=55.7 is in the neutral-to-strong range and is not overbought, leaving room for an upward recovery. Within the Bollinger Bands [153.
post-image
SKHYB
SKHYBSK Hynix
Pump.Fun
MC:$3.08KHolders:1
0%
The market is unusually quiet; the three assets seem to be lying low together.
$BT 80,660, institutions are calmly accumulating in batches 🏢
The Coinbase premium is still there, indicating that U.S. retail investors are still buying, but the premium is narrowing, and the sense of urgency is clearly weaker than before. At 80,660, institutions are building positions gradually, not chasing the candles. Large on-chain transfers are increasing, but the number of active addresses has barely moved—the funds are changing locations, not frequently changing hands.
$ET 2,337, Uniswap trading volume is g
post-image
SOL-0.77%
$ENA : Using price-volume confirmation to find opportunities, with levels and exit lines here
$ENA There’s a very typical debate right now: one side cites the 24-hour -0.62% move as proof of direction, while the other counters with key levels. I’m not taking sides based on the percentage change for now, because the $ENA price has already moved, but trading activity and volume haven’t kept up, so they haven’t given us the full picture. We can provisionally trust the direction, but not assume the move will continue; a move without follow-through can be reversed at any time.
My view is that the di
post-image
ENA+8.04%
$SOL is $102 and BNB $755, both up about 1% while Doge and Ton barely twitched. The whole market is a thin slice of watermelon, fren. Which one leads the next leg? NFA.
post-image
SOL-0.77%
BNB-0.76%
DOGE-0.22%
Please apart from being a #ChelseaFC fan can you tell me another sin you’ve committed?? 😭😭
post-image
Load More

Join 40 M users in our growing community

⚡️ Join 40 M users in the crypto craze discussion

💬 Engage with your favorite top creators

👍 See what interests you

Trending Topics

FedDecisionCountdown

35.94k Views1.29k Discussing

The Fed will announce its rate decision on October 28 at 18:00 (UTC), followed by a press conference at 18:30 (UTC). Markets widely expect rates to remain unchanged, with attention turning to future policy signals. Could this decision break crypto out of its trading range? What signals are you watching?

GateFirstToLaunchGoldCFD7X23Trading

65.59k Views6.43k Discussing

SKHynixQ3RevenueHitsRecordHigh

12.09k Views2.69k Discussing

View More