Onegog

When STONfi launched cross-chain, a choice had to be made about the execution model for swaps between networks. They could have gone the AMM route, like in regular pools, but they chose RFQ - requesting quotes from market makers. And that decision shaped how the protocol works today.
AMM is an automated market maker. A model where the price is determined by a formula based on the token balance in a pool. It works perfectly inside one network because liquidity can be gathered in one place and managed through a smart contract. But in cross-chain a problem arises, tokens are in different networks

STONfi is built so that the same interface works both for people who open a wallet for the first time and for those managing large positions. This is rare quality, backed by a thoughtful architecture—not just a lucky design.
A newcomer logs in and sees a clear picture. A pair to swap, a swap button, APR in the pools. Nothing extra. You don’t need to read documentation to make your first swap. Omniston selects the best rate itself, the fee is shown before confirmation, and the transaction goes through in a couple of seconds. The entry threshold is minimal.
But if you dig deeper, under this same

Ethereum was the main DeFi platform for a long time, but its problems are known: gas spikes during peak hours, transactions hang, the network gets congested. TON ($GRAM ) was built differently from the start, and STONfi as the main exchange of the network shows what that means in practice.
The first thing you notice is swap speed. While on Ethereum a transaction can hang for minutes waiting for confirmation, on STONfi a swap goes through in a couple of seconds. The reason is sharding. TON splits the load between parallel chains, and swaps do not compete for block space with transfers or games.

Every time I make a swap on STONfi, the transaction goes to the network and gets confirmed in a couple of seconds. During those seconds a verification takes place, handled by validators. And everything depends on how they work: speed, security, and commission.
Validators in TON are nodes that confirm blocks of transactions. They are not appointed from above but selected based on proof-of-stake. To become a validator, a certain amount of $GRAM must be staked. If a validator behaves dishonestly, their stake gets burned. This is the basic protection mechanism against fraud.
How confirmation works

With the expansion of STONfi's cross-chain to seven networks, USDT0 on Arbitrum appeared in the list of supported tokens. Not just USDT, but USDT0. And this is not a random addition, but a thoughtful step that expands Omniston's routing capabilities.
Let's start with what USDT0 is. It is a wrapped version of USDT, issued specifically for Arbitrum. It exists in parallel with regular USDT on the same network. Technically, these are two different tokens with different contracts, although both are pegged to the dollar. Why is this needed? Arbitrum has several token standards, and USDT0 provides co

When STONfi launched cross-chain in June, there were five available networks: TON, Ethereum, Base, BNB Chain, and Polygon. Just a month has passed, and the list has grown to seven. Avalanche and Arbitrum have been added. The pace speaks for itself.
Why this pace matters. Usually after a major launch a platform takes a pause. It looks at metrics, collects feedback, fixes bugs. STONfi took a different path. Launch, debugging, and expansion are happening in parallel. This means the Omniston architecture was designed for scaling from the start, not for just one pair of networks.
Avalanche and Arbi

The STONfi cross-chain network keeps expanding. Avalanche and Arbitrum have joined TON, Ethereum, Base, BNB Chain, and Polygon. Now seven networks inside one app, and stablecoin swaps between them happen without bridges or extra interfaces.
The list of supported tokens has grown with the networks. USDT on TON ( $GRAM ), USDT and USDC on Avalanche, USDT0 and USDC on Arbitrum, plus everything from before: USDT and USDC on Base, Ethereum, BNB Chain, plus PUSD and USDC on Polygon. You can swap in any combination, Omniston finds the course.
Behind all of this is an atomic execution model. Put simpl

When a project launches on $GRAM , it faces a choice: build its own swap infrastructure or take a ready one. And more and more often the choice falls on STONfi. Not because it is trendy, but because building your own is expensive, slow, and risky.
Take Grambo. A token launchpad could write its own smart contract for swaps, set up pools, attract liquidity. That is months of work and a ton of tests. Instead they embedded the STONfi interface right into the feed. A user launches a token and can immediately swap it without leaving the launchpad. Liquidity flows into existing STONfi pools, not ones

Not long ago STONfi launched cross-chain swaps. TON, Ethereum, Base, BNB Chain, Polygon are now connected inside one interface. It looks simple: choose a pair, press swap, get tokens in another network. But behind this simplicity lies a problem rarely discussed: the same tokens have different prices in different networks.
Take USDT. On $GRAM it may have one price, on Ethereum a slightly different one, on Base a third. The difference is usually tiny, but it exists. And when you make a cross-chain swap, it is not enough to just find the best course inside one network. You need to match courses i

When a token on Gram Store reaches the required volume, it doesn’t simply show up on STONfi. Behind this is a liquidity migration process that turns a closed launchpad system into an open market. And STONfi here acts not just as a platform, but as a settlement layer.
Let’s start with what a launchpad is. It is a closed environment where a token exists inside a bonding curve. The price is determined mathematically, and liquidity is limited within the auction framework. But when the token reaches the target threshold in GRAM, it must move out into the wider world. And that’s where the migration

The STON/USDT pool on STONfi looks simple: two tokens, an APR percentage, a button to add liquidity. But under the hood there is a mechanic worth understanding, especially if you are entering a pool not for a day but for months.
Let's start with pricing. The pool works on an automated market maker model. This means the price of tokens inside the pool is not taken from external exchanges but calculated by the constant product formula. Simplified: the amount of STON multiplied by the amount of USDT must always be the same. When someone swaps STON for USDT, they take one from the pool and add the

Omniston started as a liquidity aggregator inside TON. Then it moved to cross-chain. And now it is turning into an SDK that third-party projects can embed. And this is not just evolution, it is a shift in the architectural role of the protocol.
What is an SDK. It is a set of tools that allows developers to plug Omniston functionality into their application without needing to understand how the protocol works under the hood. RedoTrade has already announced cross-chain integration through the Omniston SDK. Gram Store uses it to process deposits from EVM networks. TractionEye uses it for swaps in

When a project on Gram Store goes to market, its liquidity moves to STONfi pools. But not just like that, LP tokens get locked for a period of six months to a year. This is not a formality, it is a mechanic that changes the rules of the game.
An LP token is essentially a receipt confirming that you provided liquidity to a pool. If these tokens are not locked, the project creator can withdraw their share at any moment and crash the pool. We have seen this many times on other platforms.
A 12-month lock makes this scenario impossible. Liquidity stays inside the pool for the entire period, and no

Recently, several projects on TON $GRAM have announced their integration with STONfi, including Grambo, RedoTrade, TractionEye, and previously Gas Pump and others. And this is not just a trend, but a logical choice in favor of infrastructure that already runs like clockwork.
When a project launches, it has to answer a whole bunch of questions. Where to get liquidity, how to facilitate swaps, what to connect to so users don’t leave for other platforms. STONfi handles all of this with a single connection. The pools are already there, Omniston is already looking for the best rates, and the excha

STONfi keeps growing into other projects on TON. This time two at once: Grambo and RedoTrade. And together they build a memecoin's path from launch to trading without leaving the ecosystem.
Grambo is a launchpad where you can start a token as easily as writing a post. No complicated interfaces, everything inside the feed. Creators and those who bring users receive rewards. And when a token reaches the required volume, its liquidity automatically moves to STONfi pools. After that swaps happen right inside Grambo through the STONfi interface. The user never even leaves the feed.
RedoTrade is a t

When the market goes quiet, many platforms empty out. Volumes drop, users scatter, activity heads toward zero. But on STONfi pools keep working, even if everything around stands still.
The reason is not one single factor, but a combination of them. The depth of pairs on STONfi has been built up over time. Many pools have existed for months, they have gathered enough liquidity to not depend on momentary moods. People come and go, but the base remains.
Then Omniston kicks in. The protocol does not just search for the best course, it connects liquidity from different sources. If volumes drop in o

I remember the times when networks operated separately. TON by itself, Ethereum by itself, and transferring tokens between them was quite a task. A bunch of intermediate steps, each adding time and consuming some tokens along the way.
STONfi took a different approach. Instead of remaining a platform only for $GRAM , the platform opened up cross-chain exchanges. Now, five networks converge within a single application: TON, Ethereum, Base, BNB Chain, and Polygon. Without additional tools, without switching between services.
Omniston handled all the technical parts. The protocol itself routes bet

When the TON network is overloaded, many processes can stall. Swaps go slower, commissions jump, delays appear. But Omniston inside STONfi is built in such a way that it keeps working even in such moments.
It all comes down to how the protocol handles requests. It does not just take the first available course, it scans available liquidity sources and chooses the optimal route. If one place has too high a load, it reroutes to other options. This takes a fraction of a second.
For the user it looks like a regular swap. Pressed the button and got the result. Meanwhile behind the scenes Omniston ma

If you look at the TON ( $GRAM )network statistics, the picture has not changed for a long time. STONfi holds almost half of the total TVL. And this is not a coincidence, it is a result formed by several factors.
The most obvious one is depth. STONfi has all types of pools, from classic to more advanced. Staking with GEMSTON and ARKENSTON. Swaps through Omniston which finds the best course on its own. Cross-chain routes to other networks. A user simply has no reason to go to other platforms, everything is already here.
The second is trust. The platform works without failures, commissions are t