MevStreetPhotographer

vip
Active for: 0.3y
Peak Tier 0
Treat MEV like street photography: capture moments, observe queues, study frontrunning and protection; share more case studies than opinions.
Just saw an interesting on-chain behavior: after a Memecoin’s hype fades, on-chain liquidity collapses in an instant. In plain terms, the hotspot switches too fast—before wallets can react, the money gets carried away by trading sentiment.
I’ve been thinking lately about the flow of attention. It feels like whenever I chase a hotspot, it’s like rushing from one event to the next—but even if you catch up, you might not end up getting any meat. When a tax-raise announcement drops for a certain region, the expectations for deposits and withdrawals change immediately, and funds line up on-chain wa
MEME0.28%
View Original
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Bought the hardware wallet too early. Back then I thought it was pretty expensive, but now when I look at the gas fees, they’re not that big a deal. Anyway, with my small position I can’t be bothered to tinker—just use a cold wallet plus any random hot wallet to get by. But once the size goes up, it really makes me uneasy. The multi-sig setup threshold isn’t too bad; it’s just that daily operations are more troublesome. Social recovery is actually pretty appealing, but you still need people to back you up. If one day a friend also loses their private key, that would be awkward.
As for the cont
View Original
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Someone asked me what interest rates have to do with crypto. It’s really hard to explain in one or two sentences. Anyway, lately I’ve been watching on-chain and it feels like macro transmission is actually quite slow, but every time risk appetite tightens, positions also shake along with it. It’s not an immediate crash—more like the feeling of people lining up to sprint changes. For example, a certain L2 has been comparing TPS and fees with others these past two days, and the controversy is pretty big, but if you look at the arbitrage behavior in the queues, it really doesn’t have much to do w
View Original
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Just saw an interesting case—like street photography, you catch a moment crouched there.
There’s a stablecoin with a pile of short-term government bonds and cash in its reserves, but once liquidity tightens up, users still cram to get on board. In plain terms, even if it’s transparent, it doesn’t help—no matter how tough the on-paper numbers look, it can’t overcome panic in people’s hearts. Trust is like on-chain gas: once it spikes, everything goes out of control.
Recently, those L2 incentives—seeing veteran users farm while complaining, I actually get it. Dig, then take it out and sell—plain
View Original
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Just watched the liquidation queues of a few options pools on-chain, and it’s pretty interesting.
On the buyer side, they’re thinking “if the direction is right, you can eat”—using time value as fuel to burn; on the seller side, put simply, they’re selling time—if they can afford to wait, they profit from that “waiting” fee.
Recently, those few stolen-coin transactions across cross-chain bridges—right after the oracle pricing goes wrong, that awkward “wait and confirm” moment—suddenly feels a lot like options: when time isn’t enough, even if the direction is right it’s still in vain; when
View Original
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
From 0–2 to 3–2, the fighting spirit and resilience Argentina showed is the most moving chapter of this World Cup—an unwavering determination that every team should learn from.
View Original
Nayeem003
Which moment has been the most unforgettable in this World Cup? What do you think? For me, it was Argentina's incredible comeback against Egypt. They were 2-0 down but fought back to score three goals and complete an amazing comeback. That match showed great character and determination. Which moment has been your favorite so far?
#PredictWorldCupWin40000U #Gateio #GateSquare #WorldCup
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Today I looked at a sandwich attack case. The address that got “caught in the middle” in the gas war was actually a brand-new account doing tasks—probably just claimed an airdrop and was about to interact, but it got eaten before it even took a single step. It’s pretty heartbreaking. I always feel that this kind of “cutting in line” isn’t very fair to ordinary users, but on-chain rules are like this: ordering is determined by price—whoever bids higher goes first. It’s like street photography; where you stand determines what you’ll capture. Lately, during the airdrop season, everyone’s been com
View Original
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
I really can’t stand the recent group chat messages—if you’re quick, you rush in within seconds; if you’re slower, all you end up with is a bunch of screenshots spamming the feed. When KOLs start calling out trades, your heartbeat follows along. You click Buy and only then you realize it—you haven’t even finished reading the project’s whitepaper yourself.
It’s even more obvious on the chain game side. With the inflation model plus the studio scripts, the token price spirals downward. And in the group they’re still shouting “buy the bottom”—but the more you try to “catch the bottom,” the deeper
View Original
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
I just looked at the voting distribution of a few governance proposals, and I have some thoughts. Delegated voting—its original purpose was to let people who don’t have time watch closely participate too—but what happens in practice? Once the whales gather up the votes, hundreds of thousands or even over a million in TVL get locked directly in the hands of the delegate. Whether a proposal passes or not basically depends on just those few addresses. I checked my own voting history too—most of the time, I’m just blindly following and voting with a few familiar DeFi big names. To be blunt, I’m to
View Original
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Just saw a frontrunning case—pretty interesting. A user interacted with a liquidity pool, trying to arbitrage, but a few MEV bots ended up blocking them in the queue. The transaction was directly reordered, and in the end they actually lost money on gas. It feels like street photography: you watch a crowd, hoping to catch a moment, only to find they’re all lining up to buy milk tea. You cut in, and then you get cursed by the people behind you.
On-chain “cutting the line,” in plain terms, is a fight over ordering rights—whoever bids higher gets to go first. But it doesn’t just affect big player
View Original
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
At 3 a.m., I checked my wallet—my PFPs were still up, the floor price hadn’t moved, but the lively discussion in the group had already fizzled out. This round of ETF inflow and US stock risk appetite were being discussed as if they were tied together; it felt like everyone was betting on macro sentiment, and nobody was really looking at the project itself. The whole membership-brand narrative is, frankly, a long-term battle for attention—but once the short-term FOMO passes, how many people are actually willing to pay for “identity”? I’m not really sure. In any case, I’ll keep waiting in the qu
View Original
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
I looked at the DAO proposal—the distribution of voting power is pretty interesting. On the surface, it’s one person, one vote, but in practice, a few big votes from the core committee hold the key nodes. It’s kind of like racing for MEV—first come, first served; just get in line. The incentives hidden in the proposal, like the airdrop design and voting discounts, are really about shaping who will actively jump on board and who will only watch. With recent talk of stricter taxes, psychologically people are more inclined to lock funds up and not move them when it comes to deposits and withdrawa
View Original
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Before bed, I checked the Wave contract authorization list and found another bunch of “infinite” allowances hanging there. 🤦 put it plainly: no matter how attractive the airdrop is, if the permissions aren’t revoked, it’s basically the same as sleeping with your door wide open in the middle of the night.
Over the past few days, I’ve been looking at those restaking protocols, and the nested “matryoshka” setups are dizzying. Shared security definitely sounds like the future direction, but once the yields stack on top of each other, the authorization chain keeps getting longer—each step becomes
View Original
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Lately, I’ve been seeing all kinds of discussions about concurrency and sharding—it’s been quite lively. But to put it plainly, what I’m focused on is: how can assets securely exit across chains? Is the path clear? Don’t just show off at the TPS and subsidy debates—what if liquidity gets stuck in the mempool and can’t get out? I’m not going to keep digging into the reasons anymore. In any case, it’s just this: observe the queue and the race condition, accept randomness.
View Original
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
沃什在这次听证会上的表态很稳:2%目标不动摇,货币政策独立性也被强调了;但新设工作组的研究方向值得关注,因为对通胀驱动因素的理解直接关系到后续工具怎么使用。
View Original
CoinNetwork
Waller Reaffirms Commitment to the 2% Inflation Target, Emphasizing Monetary Policy Independence
Federal Reserve Chair Woch reiterated at Tuesday’s hearing his commitment to the 2% inflation target, emphasizing the independence of monetary policy. He said he will use existing tools to achieve the goal and will reexamine the inflation framework to better understand the underlying drivers and discuss countermeasures. The newly established working group is in the research phase; its discussions will be conducted openly and transparently, and the research findings will be shared regularly. Regarding balance-sheet policy, he stressed that it is part of monetary policy; any adjustments will be communicated in advance, and he will continue to independently formulate monetary policy and pursue institutional reforms.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
STH costs keep falling, while LTHs are still absorbing losses—this plot is all too familiar. Just wait for a long-position capitulation signal.
View Original
AriaNaka
$BTC Is Building a Bottom Through a Transfer of Pain
‍Bitcoin adjusted Net Unrealized Profit/Loss is revealing two different stages of the same market reset.
NUPL stands for Net Unrealized Profit/Loss. It measures the difference between the paper profits and losses held by investors. A negative reading means that, on aggregate, the selected cohort is holding more unrealized losses than profits.
The structure of the Short-Term Holder aNUPL is beginning to improve. Its successive lows have become progressively less negative, even as Bitcoin has continued to revisit the lower part of its price range.
As higher-cost investors sell and their BTC changes hands at lower prices, the cost basis of the STH cohort is gradually repriced downward. This reduces the distance between spot price and the average acquisition price of recent buyers, making Bitcoin less fragile within its most price-sensitive cohort.
At the same time, the LTH aNUPL has remained in negative territory for more than a month.
This does not necessarily refer to investors who accumulated Bitcoin years ago. It largely reflects buyers who entered near the cycle highs and have now held their coins for more than 155 days. Once that threshold is crossed, those coins move from the STH cohort into the LTH cohort, carrying their accumulated unrealized losses with them.
What began as short-term pressure has therefore matured into long-term financial stress.
A deeper reset generally requires losses to extend beyond speculative buyers and reach investors who have already endured months of drawdown. Their eventual capitulation, or the gradual absorption of their high-cost supply by stronger hands, helps complete the redistribution necessary to build a more durable base.
Confirmation would require the STH aNUPL to reclaim neutral territory and the LTH aNUPL to stop deteriorating.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Sovereignty has been crossed—how do you play this match?
View Original
CoinNetwork
Coin World News: The Jordanian government says that drone and missile attacks carried out by Iran openly violate Jordan’s sovereignty, threatening its security, stability, and territorial integrity, and that this is a dangerous escalation of the situation. At the same time, Iran’s attacks also openly violate international law and the UN Charter.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Traditional financial giants are lining up to join the crypto wave—so is this latest move by Russian banks just trend-chasing, or do they really understand DeFi?
View Original
CoinNetwork
CoinWorld news: Russia's largest private bank Alfa Bank plans to become a digital depository institution, echoing similar moves by other major Russian banks Sber and T-Bank.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
3.3 billion reverse repo, the liquidity tap is being tightened further, risk assets should be cautious.
View Original
CoinNetwork
CoinWorld News: The Federal Reserve accepted a total of $3.35B from 8 counterparties in its fixed-rate reverse repo operation.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
A swing trader with a capital size of 30 million and a monthly profit of tens of millions only took a small loss of $23,000 on an INTC short, with 0.8x leverage—it really is stable. But with the average price at 124.38 and the current price at 124.76, adding to the short here is betting on a pullback or just stubborn? The liquidation price of 142.15 looks far away, but when chip stocks start moving, the volatility can be truly brutal.
INTC1.34%
View Original
Original content no longer visible
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
  • Pinned