Today is the 277th day of my dynamic posting, and I haven't missed a single day. Each post is not done half-heartedly, but is prepared with care. [微笑] If you think I am a serious person, you can follow me, and I hope that the content can help you every day. The world is big, and I am small, so please follow me to avoid difficulty in finding me. [微笑][微笑]

Dear all, EOS recently announced its rebranding to Vaulta and is fully transitioning to Web3 banking services. This strategic adjustment not only marks the end of an era but also reveals the difficult balance between technological ideals and real-world demands faced by early projects in the crypto industry. When the news of the rebranding broke, it triggered a strong market reaction, and the price of EOS rebounded significantly. Anyone with a bit of experience in the cryptocurrency circle knows that there was once a saying that 10% of people hold Bitcoin, while 90% have held EOS, which reflects the popularity of EOS in 2018.

Remember EOS's rhetoric? Punch Bitcoin, kick Ethereum, after three waves, the value is 500 yuan, and the possibility of speculation cannot be ruled out to break through 100 US dollars and go straight to 4 figures! You may only need 1,000 EOS in your lifetime! I've owned a lot of EOS in the past. I wonder if anyone has held on to it since then? Why hasn't EOS been able to get up? It's really a bit puzzling to think about. To have a great god: the founder is BM, and this person once overshadowed the V god. A number of bigwigs have stood up for EOS or applications on the EOS chain. To have technology: the transfer speed is extremely fast, surpassing other chains in the same period. To have an app, to have a user, to have a user. But contrary to expectations, the development of EOS was not smooth, the foundation took most of the funds and misappropriated them, and did not use them for technology development, the soul BM also chose to leave, and the node locked the coins of the project party through voting. The community completely lost confidence, EOS went all the way down, without any waves, and there was no decent rebound, so that all enthusiasm was lost, and it was marginalized to the point that the old people didn't want to mention it, and the newcomers didn't know what it was.

Many people once said that EOS is a complete lie. However, this time it is embarking on a new journey, which will also come with potential risks. For example, there is the token selling pressure, as some investors are worried about the selling pressure after the swap; and there is competition in the track, as projects like Celo have already made moves in the Web3 banking field. Whether EOS can succeed this time depends on two key factors:
1. Technology implementation: Can usable banking infrastructure be quickly launched;
2. Compliance Breakthrough: Collaborate with regulatory agencies to address the legitimacy issues of crypto finance.

If successful, this may provide a transformation model for the older generation of public chains; if it fails, it may become another warning case for the crypto industry.