Last night, when I was checking wallets, I saw a bunch of unlock calendars floating right in front of my eyes. Honestly, those staking unlocks and token unlock calendars get brought up again and again to stir worries about sell pressure. My first reaction wasn’t panic—I was thinking… shouldn’t we also patch up privacy somehow?

For regular users like us, on-chain actions are like living in a transparent glass house. You don’t want people to see what you bought or how much you sold, but the on-chain data is right there—anyone can crawl it. Recently there’s been a lot of discussion about compliance boundaries, and I’m really annoyed by that one-size-fits-all idea that “total transparency is justice.” But what’s the reality? As long as you don’t touch money laundering or do illegal fundraising, and you honestly complete the airdrop tasks, the traces that should remain can stay—don’t randomly leave traces that shouldn’t. The point is: privacy isn’t there to help you hide; it’s there to let you choose.

As for me right now, it’s just small fixes: split up wallet usage, and when interacting, pay a bit of attention to how addresses are linked—don’t let one address run around everywhere. Anyway, that “unlock anxiety” is the market makers’ business. For retail, just keep your private keys safe and don’t step into traps. Other than that, let it be.