It is commonly thought that decentralization automatically means security. No server, nothing to hack, tokens are with you. But that is only part of the picture.

The main risk of any DEX is smart contracts. If there is a vulnerability in the code, an attacker can drain tokens from pools directly, bypassing all protection. And unlike a centralized exchange, where funds are sometimes returned after a hack, there is no such possibility here.

The second point is user responsibility. You decide which transaction to sign. Someone sends a phishing link, you confirm access, tokens are gone. Decentralization does not save you from social engineering.

STONfi reduces technical risks by not holding tokens and not requiring verification. But the main protection is elsewhere: every contract of the platform can be checked independently because the code is open. This does not give guarantees, but it does give transparency.

$GRAM