Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
CFD
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
CFD
Stock CFD Derivatives
US Stocks
Access real US stocks and ETFs
HK Stocks
Trade quality Hong Kong-listed stocks
Korean Stocks
SK Hynix
Real Korean stocks and top assets
Stock Futures
High leverage, 24/7 trading
Tokenized Stocks
Backed by real stock assets
IPO Access
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
GUSD
3.8%
Mint GUSD for Treasury RWA yields
Stocks Activities
Trade Popular Stocks and Unlock Generous Airdrops
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
Cambridge study: The US hosts about 31% of Ethereum nodes; more than one-third of nodes are offline or could affect final confirmations
Golden Finance reported that on July 17, the latest research from the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance at the University of Cambridge showed that about 31% of Ethereum node activity is located in the United States, with another about 39% distributed across EU regions that do not include the UK, indicating that Ethereum node geographic distribution remains relatively concentrated in Western countries. The study’s lead, Alexander Neumuller, said that node distribution is not currently concentrated in a single country, but rather relies mainly on a small number of cloud service providers, including Hetzner, Amazon AWS, and OVH, among others.
Worth noting is that problems in the Ethereum network do not require half of validators to go offline; when more than one third of validators are simultaneously offline, the network may be unable to complete block checkpoint finalization. Neumuller pointed out that nodes and validators are not a one-to-one correspondence—multiple validators may be run behind a single node—so it is currently not possible to precisely judge the real impact of a given node or service provider failure on the validation network. In addition, the research also re-evaluated Ethereum’s energy consumption after The Merge. Data shows that Ethereum’s current annual energy consumption is about 7.9 GWh, equivalent to a continuous power of about 1 megawatt, only about 0.02% of the pre-Merge level, with energy consumption down by about 99.98%. At present, the proportion of the Ethereum network’s use of sustainable energy exceeds 56%, higher than the global average. The report also notes that client software concentration is another potential risk—if a vulnerability affects a dominant client, it could impact a large number of network participants. The report was released by the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance, with support from the Ethereum Foundation.