Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
CFD
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
CFD
Stock CFD Derivatives
US Stocks
Access real US stocks and ETFs
HK Stocks
Trade quality Hong Kong-listed stocks
Korean Stocks
SK Hynix
Real Korean stocks and top assets
Stock Futures
High leverage, 24/7 trading
Tokenized Stocks
Backed by real stock assets
IPO Access
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
GUSD
3.8%
Mint GUSD for Treasury RWA yields
Stocks Activities
Trade Popular Stocks and Unlock Generous Airdrops
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
Cambridge Research: The U.S. hosts about 31% of Ethereum nodes; more than one-third of nodes are offline or may affect final confirmations
Cointelegraph reported that on July 17, the latest research from the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance at the University of Cambridge showed that about 31% of Ethereum node activity is located in the United States, while another about 39% is distributed across EU regions that do not include the United Kingdom, indicating that Ethereum node geographic distribution remains fairly concentrated in Western countries. Alexander Neumuller, the head of the research, said that node distribution is not currently concentrated in a single country, but instead largely relies on a small number of cloud service providers, including Hetzner, Amazon AWS, and OVH.
Of note, the Ethereum network does not require half of validators to go offline before problems occur. When more than one third of validators are offline at the same time, the network may be unable to complete block checkpoint finalization. Neumuller pointed out that nodes and validators are not in a one-to-one relationship; multiple validators may be run behind a single node, so it is currently not possible to precisely determine the actual impact of a particular node or provider failure on the validation network. In addition, the study also re-evaluated the energy consumption after Ethereum’s The Merge.
Data show that Ethereum’s current annual energy consumption is about 7.9 GWh, equivalent to roughly 1 megawatt of continuous power, only about 0.02% of the pre-Merge level, with energy consumption down by about 99.98%. The proportion of sustainable energy used by the Ethereum network is currently above 56%, higher than the global average. The report also notes that software client concentration is another potential risk—if a vulnerability appears in the dominant client, it could affect many network participants. The report was published by the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance, with support from the Ethereum Foundation.