Adam Back and Michael Saylor both posted in succession to oppose the BIP110 “filtering forks” proposal

robot
Abstract generation in progress
ME News report, July 12 (UTC+8): Blockstream CEO Adam Back and Strategy founder Michael Saylor both posted in succession to express opposition to the BIP 110 proposal. Adam Back said the essence of BIP 110 is an attempt to constrain others’ behavior through means at the consensus layer, which conflicts with Bitcoin’s core attributes of decentralization and permissionlessness. Bitcoin’s technical consensus mechanism itself is a set of efficient immune systems—any change that hasn’t been rigorously argued by hundreds of developers cannot pass. He called on supporters of BIP 110 to deeply understand Bitcoin’s operating logic, rather than creating a new fork. By contrast, Michael Saylor said BIP 110 escalates a dispute over spam into a potential consensus change that could make some currently valid transactions ineffective, and that precedent is itself the real risk. BIP 110 is a Bitcoin improvement proposal intended to modify the default relay strategy to filter or limit on-chain transactions embedding certain types of data (such as OP_RETURN outputs). Its supporters believe this could help curb the widespread proliferation of on-chain spam. (Source: BlockBeats)
BTC-0.40%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pinned