Buy Crypto
Pay with
USD
USD
Buy & Sell
Hot
Supports Visa, Mastercard, SEPA & more
P2P
0 Fees
Flexible trading, zero fees
Gate Card
Use your crypto for payments worldwide
Markets
Trade
Basic
Advanced
Futures
Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
CFD
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Stocks
CFD
Stock CFD Derivatives
US Stocks
Access real US stocks and ETFs
HK Stocks
Trade quality Hong Kong-listed stocks
Korean Stocks
SK Hynix
Real Korean stocks and top assets
Stock Futures
High leverage, 24/7 trading
Tokenized Stocks
Backed by real stock assets
IPO Access
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
GUSD
3.8%
Mint GUSD for Treasury RWA yields
Stocks Activities
Trade Popular Stocks and Unlock Generous Airdrops
Earn
Launch
CandyDrop
tag
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
IPO Access
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Investment
Square
Square
Post, share, and explore crypto trends
Live
moments live
Live crypto market analysis
Chat
Chat with crypto traders
News
What is happening in crypto
flower_head
More
Promotions
AI
Others
TradFi
2026 World Cup
Rewards
Square
Latest
Hot
News
Profile

Vitalik proposes a compromise between two AI camps: pre-agree to trigger a pause if extreme circumstances arise

MeNews
robot
Abstract generation in progress
ME News message, July 11 (UTC+8), Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin posted to discuss the controversy surrounding AI superintelligence. He said that the AI community is currently divided into two camps: one believes superintelligence will inevitably arrive before 2040, so it must be controlled as soon as possible; the other believes AI is just ordinary technology, and that pushing for a pause is about controlling humans. Vitalik said he is not sure which side is correct and is open to slowing down or pausing, but he opposes the narrative pushed by large AI companies that “open source is harmful,” saying it is essentially about power concentration. Vitalik proposed a compromise: both sides can pre-agree that if certain extreme scenarios (such as a super pandemic disease, large-scale unemployment, etc.) truly occur, they will agree to initiate an AI pause; if these situations do not happen, then they will proceed according to the other side’s plan. He acknowledged that all response measures have flaws, and that humans can only choose between “imperfect” and “more imperfect,” but defensive technologies such as formal verification, cryptography, and secure hardware are worth advancing in both worlds. (Source: PANews)
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments

  • Pinned

Sitemap