The Ethereum Foundation's Protocol Support team has been disbanded. This team was the hub that organized core developer meetings, tracked network upgrades, and advanced EIPs. The immediate consequence is a rise in coordination costs: in the past, developers relied on this team to align the roadmap and resolve disagreements; now these functions may be scattered across individual client teams or external organizations. If coordination efficiency declines, the pace of the next network upgrade may slow down.

On a deeper level, this reflects the shrinking role of the Foundation. In recent years, the EF has been trying to reduce direct control over core development, letting the community and client teams take on more responsibility. But the Protocol Support team was one of the few entities that could maintain a global perspective, and its disappearance could make Ethereum's long-term technical direction more fragmented.

The risk is that without central coordination, conflicts of interest become harder to reconcile. For example, the prioritization of EIPs and dispute resolution for hard forks could become deadlocked. Although Vitalik and a few core developers still have personal influence, the lack of institutionalized coordination is structural.

Of course, this may not be a bad thing. If the community can spontaneously form more effective governance mechanisms, Ethereum will become more decentralized. But for now, the uncertainty of the transition period is real. Developers need to be alert that the coordination vacuum could be filled by other interest groups—such as large mining pools or L2 teams.

$eth #layer2 # blockchain #加密市场 # crypto community
#eth #web3 #HashiChainNews