Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
CFD
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
CFD
Stock CFD Derivatives
US Stocks
Access real US stocks and ETFs
HK Stocks
Trade quality Hong Kong-listed stocks
Korean Stocks
SK Hynix
Real Korean stocks and top assets
Stock Futures
High leverage, 24/7 trading
Tokenized Stocks
Backed by real stock assets
IPO Access
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
GUSD
3.8%
Mint GUSD for Treasury RWA yields
Stocks Activities
Trade Popular Stocks and Unlock Generous Airdrops
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
IPO Access
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
Ethereum Foundation: The bottleneck of AI auditing has shifted from discovering vulnerabilities to verifying vulnerabilities
Wu learned that the Ethereum Foundation's Protocol Security Team published an article summarizing methods and experiences in using AI agents to audit Ethereum protocol code. The team stated that AI agents have already discovered real security vulnerabilities, including the libp2p Gossipsub remote trigger crash vulnerability (CVE-2026-34219), but the main bottleneck in security audits has shifted from finding vulnerabilities to verifying their authenticity.
The article argues that AI is more suitable as a vulnerability search tool rather than a final arbiter. It excels at combining code and specifications to discover potential vulnerabilities, verify security invariants, and generate vulnerability reproduction code. However, it also tends to misjudge actually unreachable call chains as reachable, exaggerate the severity of vulnerabilities, and has limited ability to recognize vulnerabilities that require multiple legitimate steps triggered in a specific sequence. Therefore, the team requires that all candidate vulnerabilities must be independently reproducible in real code, undergo independent verification and deduplication, and ultimately be confirmed by humans as to whether the vulnerability is valid, whether it is a duplicate report, and when to disclose it.