Mining Stocks' Historic Decoupling from BTC: When "Crypto Beta" Becomes "AI Compute Shadow Stocks"

In 2026, Bitcoin mining stocks are undergoing a permanent restructuring of their valuation system. CoinShares data shows that listed mining companies' AI revenue share is expected to reach 70% by year-end, with signed AI/HPC contracts totaling over $17.5k. Traditional mining stocks like MARA and RIOT have completely decoupled from Bitcoin price movements and instead resonate highly with the SOX semiconductor index. This article deeply analyzes the underlying logic, core data, and potential risks of this structural shift, clarifying the new trading paradigm of "betting on AI to trade mining stocks" for investors.

I. Anomalous Divergence: BTC Stabilizes and Rebounds, But Mining Stocks Continuously Bleed

As of early July 2026, the spot price of Bitcoin is stable around $63,300, rebounding significantly from the year's low. The 24-hour trading volume remains at $45.4 billion, with a market cap of about $1.75 trillion. According to trading logic from past years, mining stocks should be the sharpest spear in this rebound—small moves in coin price lead to big moves in mining stocks, and range-bound coin prices see mining stocks holding up well. The two are highly correlated and move in sync.

However, the reality is the opposite.

According to CoinShares' Q1 2026 Mining Report, since April this year, the overall overseas mainstream Bitcoin mining sector has retraced over 20%. Strangely, during this period, Bitcoin did not crash but instead steadily repaired from the $58k level to the $63k range. Leading mining stocks like RIOT and MARA did not follow the rebound but continued to make new lows.

This is not a short-term anomaly but a permanent shift in the valuation anchor.

II. Root Cause Analysis: Mining Has Become a "Structurally Loss-Making" Business

To understand why mining stocks have abandoned BTC, we must first see the economic reality of Bitcoin mining itself.

CoinShares data shows that in Q4 2025, the average cost for listed mining companies to produce a single BTC surged to approximately $79,995. Meanwhile, Bitcoin prices fluctuated between $68,000 and $75,000 during the same period—meaning miners suffered nearly $20k in losses for each coin mined.

The Bitcoin halving in April 2024 cut the block reward from 6.25 to 3.125 BTC per block, halving the guaranteed revenue per unit of hashrate. The "Hashprice," a core indicator of miner profitability, fell to about $29 per PH/s per day in Q1 2026, a historic low since the 2024 halving. The gross margin of Bitcoin mining has dropped from 90% during the 2021 bull market to about 60% now.

In stark contrast, the gross margin of AI cloud computing services is as high as 85%, with lower energy costs. This equation has become unsustainable: the same electricity, the same server rooms, the same infrastructure—hosting AI compute is far more profitable than mining Bitcoin.

This explains why in Q1 2026, listed mining companies sold a record 32,000 Bitcoin, exceeding the total sales volume of all four quarters of 2025. Marathon sold 15,133 Bitcoin in March, Riot Platforms sold 3,778 Bitcoin for $289.5 million, and Bitdeer completely emptied its treasury reserves.

Bitfarms CEO Ben Gagnon put it bluntly: "We are no longer a Bitcoin company."

III. Valuation Restructuring: From "Crypto Cycle Tool" to "Core Asset of AI Infrastructure"

The capital market's repricing of mining stocks is essentially a sector transformation.

Take leading mining stock RIOT as an example: its stock price volatility correlation has completely shifted—historically almost 100% anchored to Bitcoin's rise and fall, it now highly resonates with the U.S. stock SOX semiconductor index, with correlation continuously rising. The linkage between mining stocks and the AI/semiconductor supply chain has completely replaced the original crypto cycle logic.

Yahoo Finance analysis points out that Hut 8, TeraWulf, and Core Scientific have all gained over 90% year-to-date in 2026 by transforming Bitcoin mining facilities into AI data centers. However, the question is whether these gains are based on real future cash flows or narrative premiums from the AI hype.

CoinShares' forward projection is staggering: by end of 2026, up to 70% of listed mining companies' revenue may come from AI infrastructure, compared to only about 30% currently. Total announced AI/HPC contracts exceed $58k. The capital reallocation is structural, not cyclical.

This means the speculative narrative for mining stocks has fully iterated:

• Old story: Relying on Bitcoin halving, coin price increases, and mining profit expansion to benefit from the crypto cycle.

• New story: Reusing idle compute power, high-performance chip compute reserves, and IDC facility resources to meet the explosive demand for global AI compute, riding the tech growth track.

IV. Transformation Samples: Who Is All-in on AI, Who Is Still Hesitating?

This transformation is not just on paper; leading mining companies have already voted with real money.

Core Scientific is perhaps the most thorough case. The company, which emerged from bankruptcy restructuring in 2024, signed a 12-year, $10.2 billion agreement with CoreWeave. Its AI hosting business revenue already accounts for 39% of total revenue, and it plans to gradually shut down Bitcoin mining operations by end of 2026.

IREN (formerly Iris Energy) reached a $9.7 billion deal with Microsoft to deploy 76,000 NVIDIA GB300 GPUs at its Childress campus in Texas. The company holds zero Bitcoin in its treasury—this is not forced selling but an active strategic choice.

Hut 8 signed a 15-year, $7 billion contract with Google-backed Fluidstack to build a 245 MW AI data center. In its earnings call, the company clearly stated that Bitcoin is no longer its "long-term strategic focus."

TeraWulf has signed HPC contracts totaling $12.8 billion, with 27% of its revenue already coming from AI business.

MARA Holdings has sold over $1 billion in Bitcoin in recent months. CEO Fred Thiel stated that the goal is to "direct hashrate to the most productive uses." It still holds 53,822 BTC, but its strategic outlook has been renewed.

Even Bitdeer emptied its treasury of 943.1 Bitcoin reserves, directing the proceeds along with $300 million in new fundraising entirely to AI infrastructure. The underlying logic is clear: Bitcoin and AI represent two certain trends for the next decade, and their common constraint is only one—electricity. Around this core scarce resource, Bitdeer is building a compute infrastructure platform centered on electricity.

V. Double-Edged Sword: The Price of an Independent Bull Market Is "Valuation Double-Kill" Risk

This decoupling is a deadly double-edged sword for investors.

On the positive side, it's intuitive: even if Bitcoin experiences short-term volatility or gradual declines in the future, as long as the AI sector sentiment remains hot and semiconductor stocks continue to strengthen, mining stocks can completely run an independent bull market, no longer held hostage by coin prices and free from the high volatility of the crypto market. The year-to-date doubling of Hut 8, TeraWulf, and Core Scientific already proves this.

But the potential risks are far more deadly than the returns and are the most easily overlooked pitfalls:

During upward phases, mining stocks give up BTC's high beta and don't follow coin price gains; during sentiment pullbacks, mining stocks will be sold off with much higher priority than Bitcoin.

Bitcoin has spot funds, institutional holdings, and safe-haven capital underpinning it, providing strong support. But mining stocks restructured as AI compute assets carry inherent tech valuation bubble characteristics. Once global AI sentiment fades, the semiconductor sector pulls back, or expectations of compute oversupply increase, mining stocks will face a valuation double-kill—neither supported by the crypto cycle nor buffered, they will be the first to bear the brunt of tech sector capital flight, with declines likely far exceeding Bitcoin's, leading to extreme scenarios where "coin price is stable but stocks crash."

Yahoo Finance analysis has already warned: "TeraWulf and Hut 8 carry elevated risk due to high valuation multiples, Bitcoin-related losses, and data center revenues that remain largely unrealized future income streams."

Although Core Scientific is seen as the "most attractive" option—having started collecting rent from CoreWeave, a price-to-sales ratio of only 25x, and plans to shut down mining by end of 2026—whether its transformation can successfully deliver on the promises of over $70 billion in contracts remains unknown.

VI. Trading Paradigm Shift: The Era of "Bet on Coin to Trade Stocks" Is Over

Summary of core conclusions: The historic decoupling of mining stocks from BTC is not a short-term anomaly but a permanent shift in the valuation system. From now on, mining stocks are no longer crypto cycle tools but shadow AI compute assets, with trading logic fully cross-sector.

Key trading ideas going forward:

1. The new era of betting on AI and semiconductors to trade mining stocks has officially begun. AI sentiment will become the primary variable driving mining stock movements. Hot topics in domestic large models, South Korean semiconductor supply chain capacity, and global AI capital flows will all directly transmit to overseas mining stock prices.

2. Distinguish "real transformation" from "storytelling." CoinShares defines a 30% AI revenue share as the "substantive transformation" threshold. IREN (85%), Cipher Digital (60%), and Core Scientific (39%) have entered substantive transformation phases; while MARA (12%) and RIOT (8%) remain in a "story but no delivery" stage, with greater risk exposure.

3. Beware of the "valuation double-kill" window. When the SOX semiconductor index experiences periodic corrections or expectations of an AI compute supply-demand gap narrow, mining stocks will simultaneously lose support from both the crypto cycle and the tech cycle, becoming the first assets to be sold off. At such times, the extreme scenario of "coin price stable, stocks crash" is highly likely.

4. Focus on contract execution pace, not contract amount. The over $70 billion in signed contracts are "forward revenue," not "current profit." Data center construction cycles are long, capital expenditures are large, and any delivery delays or customer defaults will trigger valuation repricing.

VII. Conclusion: Stay Clear-Headed at the Crossroads of Sector Transformation

Last night's sideways sweep with wicks likely caught many off guard. Long positions held until panic set in, selling at the bottom, then turning to short in frustration, only to be pinned at highs by a V-shaped reversal.

But in this decoupling of mining stocks and BTC, what's truly deadly is never short-term volatility but the cognitive dissonance caused by the valuation logic shift. You're still judging whether to buy RIOT based on "how much Bitcoin has risen," while the market is already pricing mining stocks based on "whether Nvidia's earnings are good."

The more chaotic the market and the more narratives fly, the less you can act on emotion. Holes from being trapped are never filled by rushing to add positions; lost profits are eventually recovered by steady, rhythmic steps.

The future of mining stocks is not in mining rigs but in GPUs; not in block rewards but in AI contracts. Only by understanding this can you truly grasp the structural transformation happening in this market.

#GUSD年化升至3.8% $ETH