Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
CFD
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
CFD
U.S. stock CFD derivatives
US Stocks
Access real US stocks and ETFs
HK Stocks
Trade quality Hong Kong-listed stocks
Korean Stocks
SK Hynix
Real Korean stocks and top assets
Stock Futures
High leverage, 24/7 trading
Tokenized Stocks
Backed by real stock assets
IPO Access
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
GUSD
Mint GUSD for Treasury RWA yields
Stocks Activities
Trade Popular Stocks and Unlock Generous Airdrops
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
IPO Access
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
Former ByteDance Seed engineer: ByteDance iteration takes half a year, Google rumor says only three months.
ME News, April 24 (UTC+8): According to Beating’s monitoring, Zhang Chi, a former engineer from ByteDance’s Seed team and now an assistant professor at Peking University, revealed on the podcast Into Asia that it takes ByteDance about half a year to complete a round of large-model training (pre-training plus post-training), while Google reportedly only needs three months. He believes that iteration speed is one of the core reasons Chinese companies struggle to catch up. Zhang Chi spent about a year at ByteDance, and his mathematics team was more research-oriented. He said that the team’s positioning was “more for publicity,” unlike the pre-training and post-training teams responsible for model delivery.
Zhang Chi described Seed’s internal “benchmaxxing” culture (score-chasing): team leaders evaluate performance based on the benchmarks they are responsible for, and everyone is trying to rack up more scores, “but this cannot translate into a good experience in real-world use.” He said that on paper, the models from major Chinese companies can keep pace with leading U.S. models, but in practice, they are “not good enough.” Seed’s goal is to be among the world’s top, “but unfortunately, I don’t think we have caught up,” and even the goal of being number one domestically “was not achieved.”
At the end of 2024, Seed claimed that it had caught up with GPT-4o, but then DeepSeek was released, and the team realized the gap still remained. When he joined, the entire team was urgently pivoting to reinforcement learning. (Source: BlockBeats)