Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
CFD
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
CFD
U.S. stock CFD derivatives
US Stocks
Access real US stocks and ETFs
HK Stocks
Trade quality Hong Kong-listed stocks
Stock Futures
High leverage, 24/7 trading
Tokenized Stocks
Backed by real stock assets
IPO Access
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
GUSD
Mint GUSD for Treasury RWA yields
Stocks Activities
Trade Popular Stocks and Unlock Generous Airdrops
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
IPO Access
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
A tiny validation flaw, a $2.19M drain – What went wrong at Aztec Network?
The Router contract of Aztec Network is in the news after being the subject of a suspicious transaction that was discovered on the Ethereum [ETH] blockchain. This led to the loss of assets valued at about $2.19 million.
In fact, the wallet address “0x0f18….edd17” used money from the protocol’s Router contract to carry out the transaction.
A possible smart contract validation flaw
However, some cues did suggest that the protocol’s handling of proof data was flawed in the smart contract validation process. The problem specifically seemed to be with the function computeRootHashes(), which oversaw confirming the legitimacy of the supplied _proofData but only examined the first part of it.
Nevertheless, the middle portion of the same _proofData payload contained the data that processDepositsAndWithdrawals() subsequently used to carry out token transfers.
Therefore, an attacker might have created a malicious proof in which the unverified middle section contained manipulated deposit or withdrawal instructions, while the verified portion remained valid and passed the protocol’s security checks.
For its part, the contract ended up carrying out unauthorized token transfers as a result of those instructions not being properly authenticated before processing. Simply put, there appeared to be a discrepancy between what was verified and what was actually executed
More such incidents
The timing here is interesting because Raydium also found a coding error in its old AMM V3 program that caused $1.34 million worth of cryptocurrencies to be stolen from five pools.
Meanwhile, another governance takeover attack saw an exploiter steal about $1.5 million in Ethereum from a Balancer liquidity pool
A new exploit that targeted Ethereum’s Alephium TokenBridge was also found recently. In this exploit, $815,000 was drained in seven minutes using three of the four compromised guardian keys that signed forged VAAs (Verified Action Approvals).
Similarly, according to an independent Quantstamp investigation, Humanity Protocol linked a targeted phishing attack against one of its directors to the attacker’s acquisition of administrative credentials, upgrades to contracts, transfers of Ethereum tokens, and creation of new H tokens on the BNB Chain.
Overall, the Total Value Hacked (USD) has now reached $81.73 million in 30 days, according to DeFiLlama data. With $634.85 million lost in 2026 alone, April has seen the highest value drained so far.

Source: DeFiLlama
Final Summary